The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ta q200 differential scanning calorimeter

Manufactured by TA Instruments
Sourced in United States

The TA Q200 Differential Scanning Calorimeter is a thermal analysis instrument used to measure the heat flow associated with physical and chemical changes in a sample. It determines the temperatures and heat effects associated with thermal transitions in materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using ta q200 differential scanning calorimeter

1

Characterization of Wax Crystallization Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallization
behavior of wax was recorded on an Empyrean Thermo
X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical, Netherlands) using Cu Kα
radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) with a tube voltage of 40 kV.
Concretely, the samples were heated to 55 °C and then cooled
to 25 °C at a rate of 0.5 °C·min–1, and XRD patterns were registered during the cooling process.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was conducted on
a TA-Q200 differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments, USA)
in the temperature range from 85 to −20 °C at a cooling
rate of 5 °C·min–1.
The size and
shape of wax crystals in different crude oil samples
were observed at 25 °C on a LECICA DM2500P polarized optical
microscope equipped with a Pixelink CCD/CMOS camera. Samples spread
on slides were initially heated to 80 °C for 5 min to remove
thermal history and then were cooled to 25 °C at a rate of 5
°C·min–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Foam Thermal Transition Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry Tg was determined using a TA Q200 Differential Scanning Calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) on 5–10 mg foam samples in a vented aluminum pan. The samples were equilibrated at −40 °C for 5 min, heated to 120 °C, cooled to −40 °C, and reheated to 120 °C at temperature ramps of 10 °C/min. Tg was calculated as the inflection point of the second heating curve.
Wet Tg foam samples were immersed in 50 °C water for 30 min to achieve moisture plasticization. Excess moisture was removed by compressing the foam between tissue paper at 2 tons for 30 s using a Carver laboratory press. Foam samples (5–10 mg) were added to an aluminum pan, which was hermetically sealed. Samples were cooled to −40 °C, equilibrated for 5 min, and heated to 100 °C at 10 °C/min. Wet Tg was calculated from the heating curve inflection point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Thermal Analysis of Foam Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dry Tg was determined using a TA Q200 Differential Scanning Calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) on 5–10 mg foam samples in a vented aluminum pan. The samples were equilibrated at −40 °C for 5 min, heated to 120 °C, cooled to −40 °C, and reheated to 120 °C at temperature ramps of 10 °C/min. Tg was calculated as the inflection point of the second heating curve.
Wet Tg foam samples were immersed in 50 °C water for 30 min to achieve moisture plasticization. Excess moisture was removed by compressing the foam between tissue paper at 2 tons for 30 s using a Carver laboratory press. Foam samples (5–10 mg) were added to an aluminum pan, which was hermetically sealed. Samples were cooled to −40 °C, equilibrated for 5 min, and heated to 100 °C at 10 °C/min. Wet Tg was calculated from the heating curve inflection point.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Glass Transition Temperature of Foam Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differential scanning calorimetry measurements were used to determine the glass transition temperature (Tg) of wet and dry samples. Measurement were obtained using a TA Q200 Differential Scanning Calorimeter (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). Hermetically sealed aluminum Tzero (Switzerland) pans with a hole poked in the top were used for all samples and goal foam sample weight was 5–10 mg. The cycle used for dry samples (Dry Tg) was first equilibrated at −40 °C for 5 min, heated to 120 °C (40 °C/min) and cooled to −40 °C. It was then reheated again at 10 °C/min to 120 °C. The second heating curve was analyzed using TA Universal Analysis software to determine dry Tg. Wet Tg foam samples were incubated in a 50 °C water bath for 30 min and pressed between Kimwipes to remove moisture prior to running. The cycle for wet samples was equilibrated at −40 °C for 5 min, with a single heating cycle that ramps to 100 °C at 10 °C/min. The wet Tg was determined from the inflection point on the heating curve using TA Universal Analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of Nanofibrous Membrane

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H-NMR spectrum was measured on Bruker Avance 400 M NMR spectrometer. Lambda 35 spectrophotometer from Perkin–Elmer was used to record UV-vis absorption. Fluorescence emission and excitation spectra were measured on HITACHI F-4500 fluorescence spectrometer. The morphology of the nanofibrous membrane was investigated by SEM (JSM-6700F) and CLSM (OLYMPUS, FV1000-IX81). Thermogravimetric analyzer TGA 8000 from Perkin–Elmer was used to record the TGA curves of CA-FITC and CA-PpIX under nitrogen atmosphere. The FTIR spectra were measured by NICOLET 6700 from Thermo-Fisher Scientific. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was conducted on TA-Q200 differential scanning calorimeter (TA Instruments, USA) under nitrogen atmosphere. The total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) was measured by K-375 Kjeldahl apparatus from BUCHI Corporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!