The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Watchman device

Manufactured by Boston Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Watchman device is an implantable cardiac device designed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. The device is placed in the left atrial appendage of the heart to prevent blood clots from forming and potentially traveling to the brain, thereby reducing the risk of stroke.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using watchman device

1

Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All operations were performed under local anesthesia. Before surgery, all patients (excluding patients with LA thrombosis) underwent TEE, and the LAAEV was recorded. Under the guidance of the CARTO 3 (Biosense Webster, USA) system, a Thermocool SmartTouch catheter (Biosense Webster, USA) was used to isolate the pulmonary veins, and a Lasso catheter (Biosense Webster, USA) was used to verify the bidirectional isolation of all pulmonary veins. No additional ablation lines were performed in this study. The sinus rhythm of all patients was recovered through ablation, medication, or electrical cardioversion. After ablation, blocking was conducted according to routine procedure. Watchman devices (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) were used as implanted occluders, and the PASS principle was followed to release the occluders.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measurement of Left Atrial Appendage Dimensions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-dimensional (2D) TEE was performed using a commercially available TEE transducer (Vivid, Philips, the Netherlands). The maximal LAA ostium and landing zone widths were measured in the mid-oesophageal view at 0°, 45°, 90° and 135° angles, according to company recommendations. For the Watchman devices (Boston Scientific), the maximal LAA ostium width was measured from the coronary artery marker to a point 2 cm from the tip of the ‘limbus’ at the 0° angle and from the top of the mitral valve annulus to a point 2 cm from the tip of the ‘limbus’ at the other angles. For the Amulet LAA occluder (St Jude Medical, Minnesota, USA), the maximal landing zone width was measured 10 mm distally from the LAA ostium at the level of the left circumflex artery.4 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Watchman Procedure LAAO Hemodynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was a prospective study involving 27 consecutive patients evaluated at the time of percutaneous LAAO with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) between January 2019 and August 2019 at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Twenty-five patients were included in the final analysis after two patients were excluded. One patient with severe mitral regurgitation on intraprocedural TEE was excluded as that would confound the interpretation of the LA pressure-volume findings. One patient with intraprocedural conversion from sinus rhythm to AF was excluded to avoid confounding effects from the rhythm change. Given the invasive nature of data acquisition, no healthy volunteers were included in this study. Clinical demographics and parameters were extracted from the electronic medical record. The study was approved by the Yale University Institutional Review Board. Written, informed consent was obtained from all patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Left Atrial Remodeling Post-LAAO Implantation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All consecutive patients successfully implanted with an LAAO device using either the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) device (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) were included in a prospective single-center study at Dijon University Hospital for a period of four years. A complete screening with all clinical and paraclinical signs of the implanted patients was noted before the procedure, just like the data concerning the percutaneous intervention. A contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CT) was performed before and 6 weeks after the procedure with reverse left atrial remodeling defined by an increase in LA volume >10%. A blood sampling was obtained before, 48 h after device implantation and at the first visit after discharge (30–45 days) for BNP measurement. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were collected after device implantation and during the follow-up.
After 6 weeks, patients were classified according to the presence or absence of left atrial remodeling, based on the second CT evaluation.
The study sample consisted of 43 patients, with at least one-year follow-up. The flow chart is shown in Figure 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thoracoscopic Epicardial Closure for Failed LAA Closure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 74-year-old male was initially referred to our cardiology department to evaluate the indication for percutaneous LAA closure in the presence of a contraindication to OAC as therapy for AF. The patient had a history of bradycardia which required a VVI pacemaker, haemorrhagic stroke and ocular infarction. In spite of a CHA2DS2-VASC score of 3, OAC was contraindicated due to a previous haemorrhagic stroke. The patient was accepted for percutaneous LAA closure using the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). During the percutaneous procedure multiple attempts were performed for adequate placement of the device. However, due to recurrent dislocation this procedure was terminated. Subsequently, the patient was referred to the cardiothoracic surgery department for thoracoscopic epicardial closure of the LAA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Watchman Device Implantation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Under general anesthesia and standard monitoring, the Watchman device (Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, MA, USA) was implanted at the ostium of the LAA via a transseptal puncture and through femoral access, as described [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Observational Registry of LAAC with WATCHMAN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Consecutive NVAF patients who underwent percutaneous LAAC with the WATCHMAN® device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) at Helmut-G.-Walther Klinikum, Lichtenfels, Germany were enrolled in an observational registry between February 2012 and June 2018. The major inclusion criteria for LAAC procedure were patients with high risk of cardioembolism and/or contraindication for long-term anticoagulation therapy, or unwillingness to take anticoagulation drugs. Those who suffered from malignant tumor or end stage diseases with life expectancy shorter than 1 year or presented with thrombus in the left atria/left atrial appendage were excluded. The study protocol complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee at Helmut-G.-Walther Klinikum, Lichtenfels, Germany. All patients provided written informed consent for the device implantation. The cohort was divided into two groups: stroke group (patients with a history of prior stroke) and non-stroke group (patients without a history of prior stroke). An analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics, peri-procedural data, and long-term outcomes was performed for all patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Watchman Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We retrospectively reviewed all LAAO using the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) performed at a single center from May 2015 to December 2019. All patients underwent preprocedural imaging before the actual procedure to assess the LAA anatomy. Patients with presence of a LAA thrombus or who were anatomically not suitable for the Watchman device according to the device instructions for use were excluded.10 Preprocedural planning was performed using either CT or TEE according to the operator's preference. Preprocedural CT was obtained at least 72 hours before the actual procedure to reduce risk of contrast nephropathy, whereas preprocedural TEE was performed days/weeks before or on the same day as the actual procedure. Patients were then divided into 2 groups, using additional CT for preprocedural planning versus stand‐alone TEE‐guided LAAO, to compare the outcomes of the Watchman implantation. The study was approved by the Henry Ford Hospital institutional review board, and informed consent was waived for this retrospective analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ICE-guided Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ICE-guided LAAC was performed as previously described [11 (link)]. The intracardiac images for reconstructing the three-dimensional left atrium model were obtained using a 10-F SoundStar ICE catheter (Biosense Webster). Briefly, the right femoral access was first constructed, and an 11-F sheath for advancing the ICE catheter was inserted into the middle of the right atrium. The catheter was rotated until the atrial septal was fully visible. Finally, the posterior and inferior areas of the fossa ovalis were punctured. The delivery device to the sheath was advanced to the left atrium through the punctured hole. In addition, during the LAAC procedure, the ICE probe was advanced into the left atrium through the same atrial septal puncture hole. The WATCHMAN device (Boston Scientific) was used for the procedure. If the LAA morphology was unsuitable for the WATCHMAN device implantation, the LACbes device (PushMed, Shanghai, China) was instead implanted. Both sheaths have a diameter of 12-F. The diagrammatic flow of these steps is shown in Figure 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided LAAO was performed as previously described [12 (link)]. In brief, the radiofrequency catheter was replaced with a device delivery sheath. An ICE probe was advanced into the left atrium along with the device delivery sheath through the same atrial septal puncture hole. Left atrial appendage (LAA) morphology was first acquired to confirm that the device that was selected before the procedure was appropriate. Then, the closure device was implanted under the guidance of ICE. During occlusion, prominent edema of the coumadin ridge was seen (Figure 1D). Both a Watchman device (Boston Scientific) and a LACbes device (PushMed, Shanghai, China) were used as alternatives. If occlusion was appropriate, the closure device was released. At the end of the LAAO procedure, hemostasis was ensured by manual compression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!