The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using nanoscope 5 controller

1

Atomic Force Microscopy of Spin-Coated CPF Layers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of CPF layers prepared by spin-coating from a toluene solution was studied using an EnviroScope atomic force microscope with a Nanoscope-V controller (Veeco). For optimal interaction with the surface, the scanning mode was selected using cantilevers with different spring constants. It was checked that the static electric charge did not smooth the images.
Scanning was performed in tapping mode (repulsive regime). Standard cantilevers were used (force constant 10–40 N/m, resonance frequencies 150–300 kHz, curvature radius ≈ 10 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Atomic Force Microscopy of Oligonucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy was performed using a MultiMode 8™ scanning probe microscope (Bruker, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) connected to a NanoScope® V controller (Veeco, Plainview, NY, USA). The images were obtained using tapping mode in air with NSG10_DLC cantilevers (typical curvature radius 1 nm, resonant frequency 255 kHz, force constant 11.5 N/m) from NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments (Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia). Oligonucleotides containing dodecyl groups were diluted to 1.5 µM in TAM buffer. The reactions were equilibrated for 3 h at 25 °C before 6 µL of this solution was deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica surface (7 × 7 mm, NT-MDT Spectrum Instruments, Zelenograd, Moscow, Russia) and allowed to adsorb for 5 min. The surface was then washed thrice with 200 µL of 18 MΩ grade water and dried by strong argon flow. Samples were dried for 10 min prior to imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Solid Membranes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural and phase characterizations of the as-prepared solid membranes were performed by XRD using a Bruker D2 Phaser diffractometer with Cu Kα irradiation (λ = 1.54 Å). The surface morphology of those samples was characterized by an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM, FEI/Philips XL30). The morphology and microstructure of the samples were revealed by a JEOL-2001F field-emission TEM. Tapping mode atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement was performed with Nanoscope V controller (Veeco) equipped with an E-type vertical engage scanner at room temperature. The X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS) examinations were carried out with a Sigma Probe and monochromatic X-ray source (XPS, K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific) to analyze the elemental compositions. The Raman spectroscopy technique (Renishaw) was used to analyze the structural information with 532 nm Nd:Yag laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy of AgNPs Agglomeration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to elucidate the tendency of AgNPs to agglomerate in DMEM culture medium and the susceptibility of serum components to agglomerate in the presence of AgNPs. The appropriate suspensions were deposited on atomic flat mica substrate (V1 grade, Ted Pella Inc., USA) and allowed to dry under N2 stream. AFM height sensor images were collected in Peak Force Tapping mode using Bioscope Catalyst II atomic force microscope equipped with Nanoscope V controller (Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). AFM topography imaging was performed in the air using Bruker silicon scanasyst-fluid + probes. Images were processed and analyzed for nanoparticle height by means of Nanoscope Analysis (v. 1.40 R3sr5, Bruker) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging of Agarose

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic
force microscopy (AFM) imaging was performed on a Veeco Dimension
5000 scanning probe microscope equipped with a Nanoscope V controller
(Veeco, Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) and HQ:NSC14/Al BS tips (r = 8 nm, Micromasch). Warm agarose water solution was dropcast
on a plasma-treated (Gatan Solarus, model 950 plasma cleaner) silicon
wafer. The excess sample was removed by washing the silicon wafer
with water. The samples were gently blotted from the edge of the silicon
wafer and allowed to dry before scanning by tapping mode. Gwyddion
software was used for noise removal and further image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Atomic Force Microscopy of Test Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphology of the test samples was studied by the atomic force microscopy on a Multimode microscope with a Nanoscope V controller (Veeco, Plainview, New York, NY, USA). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) observations were performed in air at room temperature under the non-resonance scanning mode (PeakForce Tapping QNM). As probes, the cantilevers based on silicon nitride with a single-crystalline silicon tip SNL-10 (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) were used; the nominal resonance frequency was 65 kHz, and the force constant was 0.35 N m−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Probing Plant Cell Wall Microfibrils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To probe cellulose microfibrils in cell walls, the primary roots of wild-type and mutant seedlings were subjected to AFM as described previously (Zhang et al. 2019 (link)). The root tips were cut and treated in a peracetic acid solution (11%, v/v) at 85 °C for 3 h. After extensive rinsing, the exposed cell walls of detached root cortex cells were imaged in the air by using a multimode scanning probe microscope (MM-SPM; Bruker) with an advanced NanoScope V Controller (Veeco). All obtained images were scanned in 1-μm scale at 512 × 512 pixels using a ScanAsyst-Air probe (Bruker). The raw images were flattened to remove tilt or bow and then exported in the TIFF format using Nanoscope Analysis (version 1.8; Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

AFM Imaging of Hydrophobic Glass Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging was carried out with Veeco Dimension 5000 Scanning Probe Microscope equipped with NanoScope V controller (Veeco Inc., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) and HQ:NSC14/AlBS tips (with a nominal radius of 8 nm; MicroMasch). Samples used for AFM imaging were glass slides coated with Hydrobead Standard and Glaco Mirror Coat Zero.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy of Test Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface morphology of the test samples was studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM) on a Multimode microscope with a Nanoscope V controller (Veeco, Plainview, New York, NY, USA). The atomic force microscopy (AFM) observations were performed in air at room temperature under the tapping mode. As probes, high aspect ratio polysilicon cantilevers (TipsNano, Tallinn, Estonia) were used; the nominal resonance frequency was 125 kHz, the force constant was 3.5 N m−1, and Q-factor was about 280. Image processing was performed using FemtoScan Online software (Advanced Technologies Center, Moscow, Russia) [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biofilm Morphology on Glass and PVC by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of biofilms formed on glass and PVC surfaces was examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). AFM measurements were performed in air using a Bioscope II AFM with a NanoScope V controller (Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Biofilms were imaged in contact mode using an MLCT-D silicon nitride cantilever with a nominal tip apex radius of 20 nm. The height and deflection images were obtained simultaneously at a scan rate 0.5 Hz, at a resolution of 512 pixels per line. Each image has been done in different places selected randomly from 30 × 30 µm2 area, for a sample. AFM images were flattened and plane fitted prior to analysis. The calculated surface characteristics parameters included the root mean square (RMS) roughness (Rq), average height and surface area differences. The Rq is the root mean square average of height deviations taken from the mean data plane. Average height is the average of all the Z values. Surface area difference is the difference between the analyzed region’s three dimensional surface area and its two dimensional projected surface area. The data were analyzed with the NanoScope Analysis 1.7 software from Bruker. AFM imaging was performed in the Center of Quantum Optics at the Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!