The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Luna omega polar c18 analytical column

Manufactured by Phenomenex
Sourced in United States

The Luna Omega Polar C18 analytical column is a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of polar and non-polar compounds. The column features a proprietary bonded stationary phase that provides enhanced retention and selectivity for both polar and non-polar analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using luna omega polar c18 analytical column

1

HPLC-MS Analysis of Polar Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic analyses were performed with an Agilent Series 1100 HPLC system with a G1315B diode array detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 6000, Bruker Daltonics, Madrid, Spain) with an electrospray interface operating in negative ion mode. Separation was performed in a Luna Omega Polar C18 analytical column (150 × 3.0 mm; 5 µm particle size, Phenomenex, Madrid, Spain) with a Polar C18 Security Guard cartridge (4 × 3.0 mm), both purchased from Phenomenex. Detailed chromatographic conditions are available in [96 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Flavonoids by HPLC-DAD-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic analyses were performed with an Agilent Series 1100 HPLC system with a G1315B diode array detector (Agilent Technologies) and an ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 6000, Bruker Daltonics) with an electrospray interface operating in negative ion mode. Separation was performed in a Luna Omega Polar C18 analytical column (150 × 3.0 mm; 5 µm particle size) with a Polar C18 Security Guard cartridge (4 × 3.0 mm), both purchased from Phenomenex. Detailed chromatographic conditions are available in [39 (link)].
The most abundant compounds (flavonoids) were quantified by UV signal at 350 nm and the following analytical standards: vicenin-2, kaempferol, luteolin, and quercetin. Calibration graphs were constructed in the 0.5–100 mg L−1 range. Peak areas at 350 nm were plotted against analyte concentration. Each analytical standard was used to quantify the corresponding compound or compounds of the same chemical family. Detection limits (3σ criterion) were 0.1–0.2 mg L−1. Repeatability (n = 10) and intermediate precision (n = 9, three consecutive days) were lower than 4 and 8%, respectively. The robustness of the chromatographic method was evaluated by recording analyte signals at ±2 nm of the optimum wavelength and by slightly varying the percentage of the mobile phase (2% changes), observing variations lower than 5% for all the analytes concerning the optimum conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized Medicinal Substance Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SMS was provided by Kangmei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. after adequate quality measurement. All the herbs were taken from the same batch. Decoctions were made at Guang’ anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, according to standard operating procedures. The major compounds in SMS were identified using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Waters 2695 HPLC system; Waters, CA, USA). A Luna® Omega Polar C18 analytical column (250 × 4.6 mm, 3.0 μm; Phenomenex, CA, USA) with a mobile phase that contained acetonitrile (A) and − 0.2% phosphoric acid acid in water (B) was used. The mobile phase gradient elution was programmed as follows: The mobile phase gradient elution was programmed as follows: 27% A (0–10 min), 27–38% A (10–12 min), 38% A (12–20 min), and 38–90% A (20–60 min); 73% B (0–10 min), 73–62% B (10–12 min), 62% B (12–20 min), and 62–10% B (20–60 min). The column temperature was maintained at 35 ∘C, the flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min, and a detection wavelength of 203 nm was used. SMS was dissolved in double distilled water containing 0.05% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The solution was centrifuged, filtered and disinfected using a syringe filter (specification: 13 mm nylon filter, 0.45 μm,100 pcs/pack), and preserved at − 20 ∘C for further experimentation [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC-MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC analysis was conducted using an Agilent Series 1100 with a G1315B diode array detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a reversed-phase Luna Omega Polar C18 analytical column (150 × 3.0 mm; 5 µm particle size; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), and a Polar C18 Security Guard cartridge of 4 × 3.0 mm (Phenomenex). The mobile phases were as follows: water + formic acid 0.1% v/v (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B). The gradient elution was as follows: 10–25% B in 0–25 min, 25% B in 25–30 min, 25–100% B in 30–35 min. Then, eluent B was returned to 10% with a 7 min stabilization time. The flow rate was 0.4 mL min−1.
The HPLC system was connected to an ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 6000, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray interface. The scan range was at m/z 100–1200 with a speed of 13,000 Da/s. The ESI conditions were as follows: drying gas (N2) flow rate and temperature, 10 L/min and 365 °C; nebulizer gas (N2) pressure, 50 psi; capillary voltage, 4500 V; capillary exit voltage, 117.3 V. The auto MSn mode was used for the acquisition of MSn data, with isolation width of 4.0 m/z and fragmentation amplitude of 0.6 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-MS Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic analyses were performed with an Agilent Series 1100 with a G1315B diode array detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), a reversed-phase Luna Omega Polar C18 analytical column (150 × 3.0 mm; 5 µm particle size; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and a Polar C18 Security Guard cartridge of 4 × 3.0 mm (Phenomenex). The mobile phases consisted of water + formic acid 0.1% v/v (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B). The gradient elution was: 10–25% B in 0–25 min, 25% B in 25–30 min and 25–100% B in 30–35 min. Then, eluent B was returned to 10% with a 7 min stabilization time. The flow rate was 0.4 mL min−1.
The HPLC system was connected to an ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire 6000, Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with an electrospray interface. The scan range was at m/z 100–1200 with a speed of 13,000 Da/s. The ESI conditions were drying gas (N2) flow rate and temperature, 10 L/min and 365 °C; nebulizer gas (N2) pressure, 50 psi; capillary voltage, 4500 V; capillary exit voltage, −117.3 V. The auto MSn mode was used for the acquisition of MSn data, with isolation width of 4.0 m/z and fragmentation amplitude of 0.6 V.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!