The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss software ver 18.0

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS software (ver. 18.0) is a statistical analysis tool developed by IBM. It provides functionality for data management, analysis, and reporting. The software is designed to help users organize, analyze, and interpret data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

44 protocols using spss software ver 18.0

1

Hearing Impairment Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The association of clinical or laboratory parameters with the hearing impairment were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation, Spearman’s correlation, independent t-test, and MannWhitney test. The differences between two different treatment groups were analyzed using independent t-test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney test. To investigate the clinical factors related to hearing recovery, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney test, and chi-square test were used. Multivariate logistic regression model was performed to assess the independent association of treatment method and hearing recovery. Clinical factors found to have possible association in univariate analysis (p< 0.20) were entered into the multivariate logistic regression analysis model. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Stimulus-Locked ERPs in Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographic, clinical, and behavioral data were analyzed with one-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs) to compare group differences. In terms of stimulus-locked ERP values, the amplitudes and latencies of the P300 component were analyzed separately with repeated-measures ANOVAs (rmANOVAs) with electrode sites (Cz, CPz, and Pz) as within-subject factors and group as the between-subjects factor. In cases of sphericity violations, lower-bound corrections were applied, and corrected P values are reported. P300 values associated with significant intergroup differences were subjected to analyses with clinical variables using 2-tailed Pearson correlation coefficients. Results with P values <.05 were regarded as significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (ver. 18.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Predictive Factors for 30-day Mortality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative variables are expressed as means and standard deviation, and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Comparison of categorical variables between groups was performed using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact t-test. The independent t-test was used to compare continuous variables between two groups, the Mann–Whitney U test to compare continuous variables with non-normal distributions, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare variables among more than three groups, as appropriate (Jung et al., 2016 (link)). The predictive factors for 30-day mortality were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis (Agresti, 2013 ). Variables with p < 0.1 in univariate analyses were included in multivariate regression models. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate potential risk factors for 30-day mortality by the hazard ratio (HR). The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate 120-day survival probability in subgroup analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States), and significance was determined at a level of p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analysis of Pulmonary Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A comparative analysis was conducted between the control and PR groups using the t-test or Fisher's exact test for normally distributed and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed baseline PFT, VAS, and mBS data. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the parameters at follow-up. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, numbers (%), or medians (25th-75th percentile). All statistical tests were conducted using SPSS software ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and SPSS software (ver.18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). The resulting p-value was adjusted for judging the false discovery rate. Genes with the false discovery rate correction, p ≤ 0.05, and |log2 (fold change)|≥ 1 were taken as the candidates of DEGs43 (link),70 (link). The GO terms and KEGG pathways with p ≤ 0.05 were identified as significantly enriched by DEGs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Survival Analysis of Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS software ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The primary end-point of this study was DFS. The secondary end-points were the rate of the overall relapse, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and OS. Locoregional recurrence was defined as the reappearance of tumor in the ipsilateral breast/chest wall and/or ipsilateral regional lymph nodes. Distant metastasis was defined as tumor spread to distant organs or lymph nodes.
The Fisher exact test was used in evaluating the clinical factors related to LVI and recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for the univariate analysis of survival. The log-rank test was used in finding the prognostic factors. The Cox-regression test was utilized for the multivariate analysis of survival. A multivariate analysis of the statistically significant factors (p < 0.05) in a univariate analysis was performed using the Cox model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Molecular Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the values are presented as mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. One-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used to compare data among 3 groups. SPSS software (ver. 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Correlates of Female Sexual Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z-test was applied to identify the normal distribution of variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to identify the correlations between FSFI scores and vaginal morphology and PFM strength. A correlation coefficient (r) of >0.75 was considered “good to excellent”, 0.50-0.75 was “moderate to good”, 0.25-0.50 was “fair”, and 0.00-0.25 was “little or no” relationship [20 ]. For secondary analysis, multiple regression models using stepwise selection included age, body mass index, duration of symptoms, PFM strength, vaginal volume, and vaginal resting tone as independent variables, with FSFI domains as dependent variables. The coefficient of determination (R2) showed the explanatory power of the variables. If a statistically significant correlation between vaginal morphology and FSFI was confirmed using Pearson’s correlation, the cutoff value was determined with a decision tree. A decision tree analysis was used to identify factors that predicted sexual dysfunction. The conditions of the decision tree analysis were as follows: maximization of the decrease in impurity (minimization of the Gini index); minimum value of the parent node, 10; and minimum value of the child node, 5. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) with alpha set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparing Doppler Activity Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A paired t-test was used to compare within-group changes in the measured parameters, and an independent t-test was conducted to determine statistical differences in the variables between the 2 groups. The statistical differences of each segment in terms of the Doppler activity data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comparative Analysis of Cellular Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All values are presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference test was used to compare data among groups. SPSS software (ver. 18.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!