The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

35 protocols using emx x band spectrometer

1

Spin-Trap EPR Detection of Radicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The spin-trap technique revealed the presence of radical species using a X-band Bruker-EMX spectrometer, equipped with a cylindrical cavity operating at 100 kHz field modulation. Experimental parameters were as follows: microwave frequency 9.86 GHz; microwave power 19.97 mW; modulation amplitude 2 Gauss; conversion time 15.43 ms. Spin-traps, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) or 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP), each 17 mM, were added (separately in different experiments) to the other reagents at t = 044 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detecting Photocatalytic OH• Generation on TiO2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ESR analysis to check the photocatalytic generation of OH on powdered Kronos 1077 TiO2 and the same sample decorated (Ag-TiO2) was carried out by using as the irradiating source a solar box (Co. Fo. Megra, Milan, Italy) equipped with a 1500 W Xenon lamp and cut-off filters for wavelengths below 340 nm or 400 nm. Then, 3 mL of a sample suspension (prepared to introduce 100 mg of sample in 100 mL of pure water) were introduced in a quartz cell and irradiated under stirring for 20 min in the presence of 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO, 17 mM). ESR spectra were recorded at room temperature using an X-band Bruker-EMX spectrometer equipped with a cylindrical cavity operating at 100 kHz field modulation. Experimental parameters were as follows: microwave frequency 9.86 GHz; microwave power 2.7 mW; modulation amplitude 2 Gauss; conversion time 30.68 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EPR Spectroscopy of Frozen Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified proteins were collected in Wilmad Suprasil EPR tubes and gently frozen in liquid N2 and stored until data acquisition. EPR spectra involved a 5000G sweep on an X-band EMX spectrometer (Bruker Biospin Corp) with a bimodal resonator and cryostat for maintaining a low temperature of 4K. Average microwave frequency, 9.38 GHz; microwave power, 0.2 W; modulation amplitude, 10 G; average time = 300 s. All spectra were normalized and plotted using SpinCount software (http://www.chem.cmu.edu/groups/heindrich). A 1 mM solution of CuSO4-EDTA was used as a standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EPR Monitoring of TEMPO Redox Reaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To enhance sensitivity, EPR experiments were performed in organic solvent (MeOH), and therefore, the organic soluble TEMPOL analog, 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) was used. Importantly, the redox potentials for TEMPOL and TEMPO are nearly identical [28 ]. MCPD (5 mM) was added to 10 mL of methanol containing tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (10 mM) and TEMPO (5mM). The EPR spectra were obtained on a Bruker X-band EMX spectrometer with a gun diode as the microwave source running at 9.48 GHz. The TEMPO signal was monitored in an EPR flat cell over time for 100 min at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spectroscopic Analysis of Cellular Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MB, EPR, and UV–vis spectra
were collected and analyzed as described.23 (link) MB spectra were collected using a MS4 WRC spectrometer (SEE Co.,
Edina MN), calibrated using α-Fe foil at room temperature. Spectra
were analyzed and simulated using WMOSS software. EPR spectra were
collected at the University of Texas at Arlington on an X-band EMX
spectrometer (Bruker Biospin Corp., Billerica, MA) equipped with a
bimodal resonator (4116DM) and an Oxford Instruments ESR900 cryostat.
Signals were integrated using a custom Matlab (Mathworks.com) program.
Spin concentrations were calculated as described24 (link) using 1.00 mM CuSO4-EDTA as the standard.
UV–vis spectra of whole cells were collected on a Hitachi
U3310 spectrometer with a Head-on photomultiplier tube. Spectra were
simulated using OriginPro software as described.23 (link) Packed-cell samples were diluted 3-fold with ddH2O and analyzed in a 10 mm path length quartz UV–vis cuvette
(Precision cells). After collecting MB spectra, isolated mitochondria
were thawed anaerobically in a glovebox (≤5 ppm of O2, MBraun, Labmaster), diluted 3-fold with SH buffer (0.6 M Sorbitol,
0.02 M HEPES, Fisher Scientific, pH 7.4), and transferred to a 2 mm
path length quartz UV–vis cuvette (Precision cells). The cuvette
was sealed with a rubber septum and brought out of the glovebox and
immediately analyzed by UV–vis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CW spectra were recorded on a Bruker X-band EMX spectrometer with an SHQE resonator. Simulations of fluid solution and rigid lattice spectra were performed with locally-written software that calculates hyperfine splittings to first order. Hamiltonian parameters are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Carrageenan Radiolysis Characterization by ESR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The free radical created in carrageenan rods by radiation in the range of 0.5-130 kGy at room temperature (21-25 0 C) was detected by X-band EMX spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) using a standard rectangular cavity of ER 4102. Samples were inserted in ESR tubes, the bottom of each tube was adjusted at a fixed define position to ensure reproducible and accurate positioning of the rods in the sensing zone of the cavity. The stability of the ESR spectrometer and sensitivity were checked before and after each series of measurements using reference alanine dosimeter. Finally, the dose response curve was established in terms of correlated signal intensity against the absorbed doses. Three prepared carrageenan rods were irradiated at each dose point and analyzed by the ESR spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

EPR Spectroscopy of Membrane Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For EPR measurements, LUVs were formed from POPC:POPS=80:20 in a Ca2+ free buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM KCl, pH 7.4) and either 1 mM Ca2+ or Cd2+ was added as needed. EPR spectra were recorded using a Bruker X-Band EMX spectrometer (Bruker Biospin, Billerica, MA) equipped with an ER 4123D dielectric resonator. All EPR spectra were recorded using a 100 G magnetic field sweep, 1 G modulation, and 2.0-milliwatt incident microwave power at a temperature of 298 K. The measurements were performed on 10-µl samples in glass capillary tubes (0.60 mm inner diameter × 0.84 mm outer diameter round capillary; VitroCom, Mountain Lakes, NJ). The protein concentrations used were approximately 75 µM. The phasing, normalization, and subtraction of EPR spectra were performed using LabVIEW software provided by Dr. Christian Altenbach (UCLA, Los Angeles, CA). Progressive power saturation of the EPR spectrum was used to determine nitroxide membrane depth and was performed as previously described.35 (link), 42 (link) In this case, samples were placed into TPX-2 capillaries, and the values of ΔP½ obtained in air and in the presence of Ni(II)EDDA were used to calculate a depth parameter, Φ.16 (link) The spin label depth was then estimated using the empirical expression:
Φ=3.4tanh(0.11(x8.56))+1.1 where x is the distance of the spin label from the phospholipid phosphate plane in the bilayer.43 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fibril Formation Analysis by EPR Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibril formation was confirmed by measuring Thioflavin T fluorescence at 482 nm (FP-6500 spectrofluorometer, Jasco, Inc., Easton, MD). Fibrils were collected using centrifugation at 13,500 rpm for 10 minutes (5840R centrifuge, F45-30-11 rotor, Eppendorf AG Hamburg, Germany). The soluble portion was removed and the remaining pellet was washed repeatedly with deionized water. The sample was then loaded into a boro capillary tube (0.6 mm inner diameter, 0.84 mm outer diameter, Vitro-Com, Mt. Lakes, NJ).
Continuous wave EPR spectra were collected at room temperature using a Bruker X-band EMX Spectrometer (Bruker Biospin Corporation). Each sample was scanned 15 times using scan width of 150 gauss in an HS cavity and microwave power of 12.60 milliwatts. In a some cases (i.e. residues 10, 12, 23, and 34), spectra of the supernatant were subtracted from the fibril spectra to get cleaner fibril spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Measuring Antioxidant Responses in Plant Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Determination of NO in the roots was carried out by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) using the NO trap sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (DETC) [21 (link)]. The EPR signal of mononitrosyl iron complexes with DETC in roots treated with spermine was recorded on an EMX X-band spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) at a temperature of 77 °K.
The H2O2 content in the supernatants of root homogenates was determined spectrophotometrically using the xylenol orange method (Sigma, Shanghai, China) using a Lambda-25 spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, CT, USA, λ560). The concentration of H2O2 was calculated using a calibration curve [22 (link)]. Lipid peroxidation in the soluble fraction of the homogenate was assessed spectrophotometrically by measuring the content of TBA-reactive products (λ532) [23 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!