The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using anti cd68

1

Protein Expression in Regenerated Nerves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We digested and homogenized regenerated sciatic nerves that were homogenized in lysis buffer according to standard procedure. In brief, 20 μg protein was loaded on 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis and was immediately transferred to nitrocellulose sheets for 3 hours. All the samples were transferred to a poly (vinylidene fluoride) membrane and incubated at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were anti‐IL‐6 (1:3000), anti‐TNF‐α (1:2500) and anti‐CD68 (1:1500). β‐Actin was used as the control. The relative quantitative analysis was dependent on ImageJ evaluation of the blot's grey values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validation of Microarray Findings in Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the findings originating from microarray analysis, multilabel immuno-histochemistry was performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections of lungs derived from RMs with ATB or LTBI, as described previously (11 (link), 30 (link)). The lung sections were stained for macrophages with anti-CD68 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Cat no #MA5-13324) and anti-MX1 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Cat no #PA5-22101) antibodies to validate the in-vivo expression of these markers in lung tissue. DAPI (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Cat no #D1306) was used to stain nuclei. Images were captured using Zeiss Axio ScanZ1 and Zeiss LSM-800 confocal microscope and analysis was done using Zeiss Zen 3.6 (blue edition).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunoblot Analysis of Cell and Tissue Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously 35 (link). Briefly, tissues and cells were lysed in 1×RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, #R0278). Equal amounts of protein in each sample were loaded into a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. After transferring to a membrane and blocking with 5% milk, the proteins were probed with the following primary antibodies: anti-CtBP1 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA, #612042), anti-CtBP2 (BD Biosciences, #612044), anti-CD31 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #PA5-16301), anti-CD55 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #PA5-82005), anti-CD68 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #MA5-13324), anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, USA, #sc-365062), anti-Caspase-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-56036), anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich, #SAB4200071), anti-Myc (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, #ab9106), anti-p300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, #sc-585), anti-c-Jun (Sigma-Aldrich, #SAB4501606), anti-c-FOS (Sigma-Aldrich, #F7799), anti-p50 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #PA1-30409), anti-p65 (ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-6731-81), anti-IRF2 (Abcam, #ab3388), anti-STAT4 (Abcam, #ab68156), anti-NLRP3 (Abcam, #ab210491), anti-Il-1β (Abcam, #ab2105), anti-DNMT1 (Abcam, #ab13537), and anti-DNMT3A (Abcam, #ab2850). After probing with secondary antibodies, protein band signals were detected using a PierceTM ECL western blotting substrate (ThermoFisher Scientific, #32106).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Endothelial Cell Oxidative Stress Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Matrigel was from BD Biosciences (Le-Pont-de-Claix, France). Calcein-AM bioreagent, trolox, diphenylene iodonium (DPI), GW4869, Vas2870, and hydralazine were from Sigma, and 4-HNE was from Calbiochem, [methyl-14C]choline-sphingomyelin was from Perkin-Elmer. 5- (and 6-)Carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA), was from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen France). The anti-CD31 was from Abcam, the anti-4-HNE Michael adducts were from Calbiochem, the anti-LOX-1 antibody (aLox1 Ab) was from R&D Systems, and the anti-CD68 was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated and Alexa Fluor 546-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen. Cell culture reagents and other materials were from WWR or Sigma. Bisvanillin (BV) and bisvanillyl-hydralazone (BVH) were synthesized as reported [39 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Modulating MDM4 and p53 Acetylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-MDM4 antibodies were purchased from Bethyl Laboratories. Anti-MDM2 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems. Anti–acetylated p53, anti-p53, anti–phospho ELK1, anti-ELK1, and anti–lamin B antibodies were from Cell Signaling. Anti-αSMA antibody was from American Research Products. Anti-Fas (CH11), anti-DD1α, anti-CD68, and anti–collagen I antibodies were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Anti-AGE antibody was from Abcam. Anti-fibronectin and anti-GAPDH antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. CXCL10 neutralizing antibody was from Thermo Fisher Scientific. CX3CL1 neutralizing antibody was from R&D Systems. The activities of commercial CXCL10 and CX3CL1 neutralizing antibodies were verified by functional blocking of cell chemotaxis. C646 and tamoxifen were from Sigma. CA was from MedChem Express. Validated MDM4 siRNAs were from OriGene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Inflammatory Cell Response to Implanted Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze the inflammatory cell infiltrations around the implanted device, the mice were deeply anesthetized and euthanized. The fibrous tissues that were directly encasing the devices were postfixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected with 30% sucrose for 24 hours, and then sectioned at 20 μm using a cryostat (Leica CM 1900; Leica Microsystems GmbH, Germany). Sections were immunostained with H&E, anti-CD3 (no. 14-0032-82, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), anti-CD20 (no. MA1-7634, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), and anti-CD68 (no. 14-00681-82, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Wound Healing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wounds, together with unwounded skin margins, were excised, fixed with 10% formaldehyde, and embedded with paraffin. The sections (4 μm thick) were then deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed at 95°C by microwave in 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by exposing to 3% H2O2. After blocking with 5% BSA in PBS, the sections were incubated with anti-CD68 (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-MPO (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-CD31 (1 : 200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-desmin (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and anti-collagen I (1 : 100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively, followed by incubating with the corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. The antigen-antibody complex was visualized with a Diaminobenzidine (DAB) kit. For evaluation of staining, the overview of the positive-signal density was scored semiquantitatively as 1 (absent), 2 (low), 3 (medium), 4 (strong), and 5 (very strong). The median of scores from three observers, who were blinded to the treatment, was used for comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Phenotyping of Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the vessels were embedded in paraffin blocks, 4-micron sections were cut using a microtome and mounted on microscope slides. After washing with 1% PBS, slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody: anti-CD68 (Thermo Scientific, Long Beach, NY, USA), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for M1-macrophages, or arginase-1 (Arg-1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for M2-macrophages. Slides were then washed in 1% PBS and incubated for 1 h in a dark room with the secondary antibody: fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG, phycoerythrin–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG, or Texas Red–conjugated goat anti-goat IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). After slides were washed in 1% PBS for 10 min, nuclei were stained using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (ImmunoBioScience, Mukilteo, WA, USA). Slides were then mounted with Fluoroshield, and analyzed using confocal microscopy (LSM700 system; Carl Zeiss Inc, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunophenotyping of Co-cultured Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HMC3 cells, after co-culture with T98G cells, were digested and seeded on the cell climbing slices. After washing with PBS, the slices were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100. Then splices were blocked with BSA and incubated with anti-CD68 (ThermoFisher, US, 14-0688-82), anti-CD163 (Proteintech, US, 16646-1-AP) overnight and with fluorescent-labeled secondary antibodies for 90 min. The nucleus was stained with DAPI, and splices were sealed using glycerin. PBS washing was performed before each step above for 5 min, three times. The splices were observed under the fluorescent microscope. The experiments were repeated independently three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Protein Analysis for Cancer Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-MDM4 and anti-CD68 antibodies were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific. Anti-acetylated p53, anti-p53, anti-fibronectin, anti-Collagen I, and anti-αSMA antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Anti-DD1α and anti-Fas antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). The anti-GAPDH antibody was from Abclonal (Wuhan, China). NSC146109 (XI-011) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. SJ172550 was obtained from MedChem Express (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!