The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanoacquity uhplc

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States

The NanoAcquity UHPLC is a high-performance liquid chromatography system designed for nanoscale separations. It features an ultra-high-pressure delivery system capable of operating at pressures up to 15,000 psi, enabling the separation of complex mixtures with high resolution and sensitivity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using nanoacquity uhplc

1

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reconstituted samples were randomized into 8 blocks of 4 normal and 4 tumor samples. Triplicate LC–MS/MS analyses were acquired for each sample. LC separation was done on a Waters Nano Acquity UHPLC (Waters Corporation) with a Proxeon nanospray source. Mass spectra was collected on an Orbitrap Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in a data-dependent mode with one MS precursor scan followed by 15 MS/MS scans as previously described [11 (link)]. Detailed information on instrument parameters and mass spectra collection is provided in the Additional file 1: Supplemental materials and methods (1a). The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium [12 (link)] via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002612.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Proteomics of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were randomized into eight blocks of four normal and four tumor samples to keep identification of samples unknown during LC-MS/MS analysis. Three technical replicates were acquired for each sample resulting in 162 total LC-MS/MS analyses. LC separation was done on a Waters Nano Acquity UHPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with a Proxeon nanospray source. Mass spectra was collected on an Orbitrap Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a data-dependent mode with one MS precursor scan followed by 15 MS/MS scans as described previously (13). Detailed information on instrument parameters and mass spectra collection is provided in the Supplemental Materials and Methods. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (14) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD002612.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanoscale Proteomics Workflow with Orbitrap

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC separation was done on a Waters Nano Acquity UHPLC (Waters Corporation) with a Proxeon nanospray source. Each SCX fraction (9 total) was reconstituted in 2 % acetonitrile /0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid and loaded onto a 100 μm × 25 mm Magic C18 100 Å 5U reverse phase trap. Peptides were eluted using a gradient of 0.1 formic acid (A) and 100 % acetonitrile (B) with a flow rate of 300 nL/min. A 60 min gradient was run with 5 to 35 B over 50 min, 35 to 80 B over 3 min, 80 B for 1 min, 80 to 5 B over 1 min, and finally held at 5 % B for 5 min.
Mass spectra were collected on an Orbitrap Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A dynamic exclusion of 15 s was used. MS spectra were acquired with a resolution of 70,000 and a target of 1 × 106 ions or a maximum injection time of 30 ms. MS/MS spectra were acquired with a resolution of 17,500 and a target of 5 × 104 ions or a maximum injection time of 50 ms, and a fixed first mass of 110 m/z. Peptide fragmentation was performed using higher-energy collision dissociation with a normalized collision energy value of 30. Unassigned charge states as well as +1 and ions > +5 were excluded from MS/MS fragmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics of Brain Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In Banner and BLSA, protein identification and quantification were performed using Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as described in (Seyfried et al., 2017 (link); Swarup et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, tissue homogenization and protein digestion were performed. Resulting peptides were desalted with a Sep-Pak C18 column (Waters) and dried under vacuum. Peptide mixtures were separated on a self-packed C18 (1.9 um Dr. Maisch, Germany) fused silica column (25 cm × 75 μM internal diameter; New Objective, Woburn, MA) by a NanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters, Milford, FA) and monitored on a Q-Exactive Plus mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). MaxQuant (v1.5.2.) with Thermo Foundation 2.0 for RAW file reading capability was used to generate label-free quantification. The quantitation method only considered razor plus unique peptides for protein level quantitation. The protein abundances were log2 transformed and regressed for age at death and post-mortem interval.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Wheat Proteome Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), using nanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters) and Q-TOF Premier (Waters) as described earlier [40 (link)] with minor modifications. Samples were separated by BEH130 C18 analytical column (200 mm length, 75 μm diameter, 1.7 μm particle size), using a fast 20 min gradient of 5%–40% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate 300 nL/min. The data were recorded in the MSE mode (parallel high and low energy traces without precursor ion selection) and processed using ProteinLynx Global Server 3.0 (Waters). Spectra were searched against wheat proteome sequences downloaded from UniProt in April 2018 (136,892 entries, uniprot.org). Search parameters were as specified in the following chapter for chymotrypsin, but one allowed miscleavage for trypsin and thermolysin. Thermolysin was defined as cutting on N-terminus after alanine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, and valine, but not before proline. Identities were accepted if two or more different peptides with a score higher than 95% reliability threshold were matched. Reliability scores were adjusted based on the distribution of target/decoy queries. In the cases when several sequences matched spectra from a single gel spot, we reported accession with the highest number of reliable peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Peptide Identification by Orbitrap-Fusion Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The peptides were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid and peptide estimation was carried out using a NanoDrop. Peptides (1 μg) were analysed on LTQ‐Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) interfaced with a nanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters, MA, USA). The peptide samples were first loaded onto a trap column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 5 μl/min and then resolved on a BEH C18 nanoAcquity column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The peptides were resolved using a gradient of 8% to 70% solvent B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) for 45 min using a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The total run time for each sample was 60 min. The mass spectrometry settings were as follows: MS1 Resolution – 60,000; Mass Range – 350–1800 m/z; AGC Target – 1e6, Maximum injection time 22 ms. Include charge state – 2–6; Dynamic exclusion – 30 s. MS2: Isolation mode – Quadrupole; Isolation window – 1.2; Activation type – HCD, Collision energy – 30%; AGC target – 50,000, Maximum injection time – 40 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validation of Biomarker Proteins via MRM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis was carried out for the validation of some biomarkers of each functional network. In particular, 50 μg of protein extracts obtained from different samples were digested by trypsin onto S-Trap filters, as described above.
By using Skyline v20.1.0.155 (MacCoss Lab Software, Dept of Genome Sciences, UW) for each protein, at least three prototypic peptides and at least three transitions for each parent ion were selected and monitored by using a Xevo-TQS triple-quad mass spectrometer, coupled to a nanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, US) equipped with IonKey CHIP interface. Peptide mixtures were separated on peptide BEH C18 130 A°, 1.7 μm, 150 μm x 50 mI, iKey by using a linear gradient of eluent B (95% acetonitrile LC–MS grade (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.2% formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich)) from 7 to 95% over 60 min working at a flow rate of 3 μL/min. Each run was analyzed in duplicate, and the total area of each peptide transition was used for the relative quantification of the specific proteins by using actin peptide ion transitions for normalization (Berkman et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In-Gel Protein Digestion and LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were resolved a short distance into a pre-cast minigel, the entire lane was excised and cut into 4 approximately equal sized chunks. The proteins were reduced, alkylated and digested in-gel with the resulting tryptic peptides analysed by LC-MSMS using an OrbiTrap XL (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a nanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters). Raw files were converted to mzML using MSConvert (Proteowizard) and searched against a human Uniprot database (downloaded 090614, 20,264 entries) using MASCOT 2.3. Deamidation (N,Q) and oxidation (M) were set as variable modifications and carbamidomethylation (C) as a fixed modification. Peptide and protein identifications were validated in Scaffold 4.3.2. Peptide identifications greater than 90% probability, as established by Peptide Prophet, were accepted. Protein identification required greater than 95% probability and a minimum of 2 peptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Proteomic Analysis by LC-MS/MS with iodoTMT Labeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS for iodoTMT and the total proteome samples were performed using a nanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) system connected to a Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Peptides were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid and were loaded onto an Acquity UPLC M-Class V/M symmetry trap column (Waters) at 5 μL/min before resolving with the analytical column (Acquity UPLC M-Class Peptide BEH C18 nanoAcquity column; Waters) over a run time of 120 min. Separation of peptides was performed at 300 nL/min using a linear ACN gradient of buffer A (0.1% formic acid in water) and buffer B (0.1% formic acid in ACN). The column compartment was held at 45°C for the entire analysis.
Mass spectra were collected in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. Both MS1 and HCD-MS2 spectra were collected in the Orbitrap. MS1 scan parameters were scan range of 350–1800 m/z, 60,000 resolution, maximum (max) injection time of 22 ms, and Automatic Gain Control (AGC) target 1e6. Dynamic exclusion parameters were set as follows: exclude isotope true, duration 30 s and using the peptide monoisotopic peak determination mode, charge states of 2–6 were included. Peptides were fragmented using stepped collision energy of 25, 30 and 35. MS2 spectra were collected at a resolution of 15K with an AGC target of 5e4, maximum ion injection time (IT) of 40 ms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Peptide Analysis by Nanoscale LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lyophilized peptides were resuspended in loading buffer (0.1% FA, 0.03% TFA, 1% ACN) and separated on a self-packed C18 (1.9 μm Dr Maisch, Germany) fused silica column (20 cm × 75 μm internal diameter; New Objective) by a NanoAcquity UHPLC (Waters). Linear gradient elution was performed using Buffer A (0.1% formic acid, 0% acetonitrile) and Buffer B (0.1% formic acid, 80% acetonitrile) starting from 3% Buffer B to 40% over 100 min at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. Mass spectrometry was performed on an Orbitrap Fusion Lumos Mass Spectrometer in top speed mode. One full MS1 scan was collected followed by as many data-dependent MS/MS scans that could fit within a 3 s cycle. MS1 scans (400–1600 m/z range, 400,000 AGC, 50 ms maximum ion time) were collected in the Orbitrap at a resolution of 60,000 in profile mode with FAIMS CV set at −45. The MS/MS spectra (1.6 m/z isolation width, 35% collision energy, 10,000 AGC) were acquired in the ion trap. Dynamic exclusion was set to exclude previous sequenced precursor ions for 30 s with a mass tolerance of 10 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!