The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbitrap fusion mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Waters Corporation

The Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, high-mass-accuracy instrument designed for advanced proteomics and metabolomics analysis. It utilizes a combination of ion trap and Orbitrap technologies to provide accurate mass measurements and tandem mass spectrometry capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using orbitrap fusion mass spectrometer

1

Phosphoproteome Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation of the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) analysis was performed following the previously described protocol [44 (link)]. Briefly, immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to Dithiothreitol (DTT) reduction, Iodoacetamide (IAN)-mediated alkylation followed by trypsin digestion. The digested sample was desalted by Spin Desalting column (Thermo) and acidified with 0.5% Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 50% acetonitrile then subjected to titanium dioxide enrichment using the Top Tips system (Glygen Corp). The resulting phosphopeptide-enriched sample, dissolved in 70% formic acid and diluted with 0.1% TFA, was then subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis using the Orbitrap Fusion Mass Spectrometer that is equipped with a Waters nanoACQUITY UPLC system. A Waters Symmetry C18 180 μm x 20 mm trap column and a 1.7 μm, 75 μm x 250 mm nanoACQUITY UPLC column was utilized for online peptide separation. The acquired data was peak picked and searched using the Mascot Distiller and the Mascot search algorithm, respectively. Manual examination of the MS/MS spectra (as shown in Fig 1B) and the corresponding assigned fragment ions were conducted to verify the identified phosphopeptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

BALF Proteomics: Label-Free Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BALF samples were sent to the Yale MS & Proteomics Resource (New Haven, CT), where they were processed and analyzed via a Label Free Quantification workflow as described by Charkoftaki et al. (25 (link)). The sample preparation was slightly modified from the 2019 protocol of Charkoftaki et al. (25 (link)) given the samples were BALF. In brief, samples were filtered through a 3-kDa Amicon Ultra filter, and the retentate was SpeedVac dried and used for downstream proteomics preparation. Dried protein pellets were reduced with DTT, alkylated with iodoacetamide, enzymatically digested with LysC and trypsin, and desalted using C18 RP microspin column. High-resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (MS)/MS data were collected on an Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer coupled to a NanoACQUITY UPLC and analyzed using Progenesis QI (Waters, Milford, MA) and Mascot search engine. Quantitative data were normalized based on equal total amount of peptides/proteins injected on column, and positive protein identification and quantitation were based on hits with two or more unique peptides per protein. Experimental groups were compared and considered statistically significant when the FDR q value was <0.05, unless otherwise stated. IPA (Qiagen Bioinformatics) was used for further analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Label-Free Quantitation of Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Label-Free Quantitation (LFQ) was performed on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer connected to a Waters nano ACQUITY UPLC system equipped with a Waters Symmetry® C18 180 μm × 20 mm trap column and a 1.7-μm, 75 μm × 250 mm nano ACQUITY UPLC column (maintained at 35°C). The digested protein samples were diluted to a final concentration of 0.05 μg protein/μL in 0.1% TFA. Five μL of these solutions were injected in triplicate into the LC MS/MS system in block randomized order. To ensure a high level of identification and quantitation integrity, a resolution of 120,000 and 60,000 was utilized for MS and MS/MS scans, respectively. Trapping was carried out for 3 min at 5 μL/min in 97% Buffer A (0.1% FA in water) and 3% Buffer B (0.075% FA in acetonitrile) prior to eluting with linear gradients that reached 6% B at 5 min, 35% B at 170 min, and 50% B at 175 min, and 97% B at 180 min for 5 min; then dropped down to 3% B at 186 min for 14 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!