The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using moflo high speed cell sorter

1

Isolation and Sorting of IL-1R1+ Cells and Naive CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll gradient centrifugation (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) from whole blood. For sorting of IL-1R1+ cells, PBMC were stained with anti-human CD4-FITC (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) (1:100) and anti-human IL-1R1-PE (RnD, Minneapolis, MN, USA) (1:20) and sorted by a MoFlo high speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter, Atlanta, GA, USA). For sorting of naive CD4 T cells, the cells were stained with the anti-CD4-FITC (Miltenyi) (1:100), and CD4+ T Lymphocytes were purified by immunomagnetic selection, using the anti-FITC isolation kit (Miltenyi). After the isolation, the cells were stained with anti-CD4 FITC (Miltenyi) (1:100), anti-CD45RA BV421 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) (1:60), anti-CD45RO PE (BD Biosciences) (1:30), anti-CD27 APC (Miltenyi) (1:60), and CD4+ naive T cells were sorted by MoFlo high speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) as CD4high, CD45RAhigh, CD45RO- and CD27+. Sorted cells had a purity of over 97%, measured by flow cytometry (data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Characterization of Murine MDS Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyze BM samples of intravenous MDS mice by flow cytometry, the BM cells were stained with the following anti-human antibodies: CD34-APC (#343608, BD Pharmingen), CD45-APC-Cy (#304014, BD Pharmingen), CD71-PE (#334106, BD Pharmingen), glycophorin A (GPA)–BV421 (#562938, Biolegend), CD36-BV605 (#563518, Biolegend), CD38-FITC (#356610, Biolegend), anti–IL-3R (CD123)-PE-Cy7 (#25-1239-42, Invitrogen) for 30 min in the dark. Cells were washed twice with 40 ml phosphate-buffered saline/0.5% bovine serum albumin, resuspended in 5 ml phosphate-buffered saline/0.5% bovine serum albumin, and stained with the viability marker 7-AAD on ice for 10 min in the dark. The analysis was performed using BD FACS Diva. Sorting was performed by using a MoFlo high-speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Immune Cell Subpopulations in Murine Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining of cell surface antigens was performed with the antibodies described in Table S3 and S4. The cell suspension was incubated in HF2+ buffer for 15 min on ice in the dark. Gating strategies for analyses of hematopoietic subpopulations were performed as described previously.7, 8Total cell numbers were calculated by multiplying the subpopulation fraction with the total cell number (determined by trypan blue staining and counting on a Neubauer cytometer) of the spleen and thymus. The total BM cell number was estimated by assuming that two femora and two tibiae represent 20% of the total BM.14In this study, we used the flow cytometers EPICS XL (Beckman Coulter, Figure 2) and CyAn ADP Lx P8 (Coulter‐Cytomation, Figures 1, 3, 4, and 5) were used for flow cytometric analyses. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). Results using the two different flow cytometers were not mixed to avoid equipment bias. Cell sorting was performed with a MoFlo High‐Speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis of Erythroid Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For cell cycle analysis, 0.5 × 106 cells in 100 μL buffer (PBS + 0.5% BSA) were stained with PI and assessed by flow cytometry according to standard protocols. For analysis of apoptosis, 0.25 × 106 cells were collected on day 6 and day 7 of culture and resuspended in 50 μL buffer. The cells were then stained with Annexin V and 7AAD according to the manufacturer's protocol. To monitor erythroid progenitor differentiation, 0.25 × 106 cells in 50 μL buffer were stained with 7AAD, GPA, IL3R, CD34 and CD36. To monitor erythroid terminal differentiation, 0.25 × 106 cells in 50 μL buffer were stained with 7AAD, GPA, Band3 and α4 integrin. For enucleation, 1 × 106 cells were collected on day 13 and day 19 of culture and resuspended in 200 μL buffer (PBS + MgCl2). The cells were then stained with Syto‐16 and 7AAD according to the manufacturer's protocol (BD Pharmingen). Stained cells were analysed with a FACS Canto II (BD Pharmingen), and all data analysis was performed by FlowJo and BD FACSDiva software. For cell sorting, erythroid progenitor CFU‐E cells were stained as described above and sorted on a MoFlo high speed cell sorter (Beckman‐Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Cycle Analysis by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the time points indicated, 1.106 vector-transfected or infected cells were trypsinized and washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) prior to fixation with 70% ethanol at 4°C for 24 h. Cells were then washed twice in cold PBS and incubated in PBS containing 500 µg/ml Ribonuclease A (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C for 1 h. After filtration through a 30-µm pore size membrane, cells were stained with 10 µg/ml propidium iodide (Invitrogen) for 15 min in the dark. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a MoFlo high-speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter, Fort Collins, CO, USA) equipped with a solid-state laser operating at 488 nm and 100 mW. Cellular DNA content was analyzed with a 740 nm long-pass filter. Doublets were discarded on the basis of combination of pulse width and area/peak fluorescence. eGFP autofluorescence was detected with a 530/40 nm band-pass filter and the cell cycle distribution was specifically analyzed for eGFP-positive versus eGFP-negative cells. Cell cycle profiles were analyzed with the MultiCycle AV software (Phoenix Flow Systems, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CD44 and EpCAM Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated cells were seeded on collagen IV-coated plates for 24—36 h to revive CD44 expression diminished by digestive enzymes. Both unattached and attached (trypsinized) cells were collected and blocked with 1% BSA, 4% normal goat serum in PBS. Cells were stained with AF488-EpCAM (BioLegend), APC anti-human CD44 (BioLegend), and their respective isotypes. Cells were sorted using a Beckman Coulter MoFlo high-speed cell sorter. Unstained, isotype, and single-color controls were performed. The gates for CD44 and EpCAM were set based on the results of isotype, and single-color controls were run in parallel. The results were analyzed using FlowJo 10.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification and Differentiation of CD34+ Erythroid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CB was obtained from the New York Blood Center and PB from the New York Blood Center and the Stanford Blood Center. The present study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and was exempt from institutional review board approval since none of the human samples had identifiable personal information. CD34+ cells were purified from CB or non-mobilized PB leukoreduction filters by magnetic positive selection (Miltenyi Biotec). Erythroid differentiation of isolated CD34+ cells (Table 1) was monitored as a function of surface marker expression on a BD LSR Fortessa (Becton Dickinson) and data subsequently analyzed using FCS express 6 software (De Novo, Inc) as previously described[18 (link), 21 (link)]. Pure populations of erythroid cells at distinct stages of differentiation were sorted using a MoFlo high-speed cell sorter (Beckman-Coulter) as previously described[18 (link), 21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generation of Stable Transduced HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were transduced with 200 ng CAp24 of lentivirus prepared as described above. After 24 h transduction, cells were washed, replaced with new culture medium and further incubated for 48 h. At 72 h post-transduction, cells were trypsinized, filtered through 37 μm Nylon Mesh to remove cellular clumps and diluted in PBS to a concentration of 2 × 107 cells/ml. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses were performed to isolate cells expressing high levels of mCherry using a MoFlo high speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter). The isolated HeLa cells expressing Nullbasic-mCherry (Hela-Nullbasic-mCherry) or FLAG-mCherry (Hela-FLAG-mCherry) were expended and prepared for proteomic experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Viability Assay using Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Percentage of dead cells was determined by staining with propidium iodide (PI 1 μg/ml eBioscience) and acquisition was performed on flow cytometry (Canto, BD Biosciences). Analysis was performed using FlowJo software. In some experiments GFP positive population of SK-N-MC cells transfected with pEGFP and pEGFP-DHX9 constructs, was isolated using a MoFlo high speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation of Epiblast Cells for ChIP-seq

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP experiments, epiblast cells were isolated from E6.25 pre-gastrulating embryos coming from outbred MF1 females crossed with GGOF stud males. After recovering embryos from the decidua, Reichert’s membrane was dissected out and extraembryonic cone was also removed. Remaining tissue was used to prepare single cell suspension for sorting using MoFlo high-speed cell sorter (Beckman Coulter, CA) based on EGFP expression. The purity of epiblast cells was assessed by staining for SOX2 and was in excess of 95%. For single epiblast experiments, embryos were dissected as previously described (Tesar et al., 2007 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!