The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3.0 t system

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The 3.0-T system is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner developed by GE Healthcare. It features a 3.0 Tesla (T) superconducting magnet, which provides a strong and uniform magnetic field for acquiring high-quality images of the human body. The system is designed to facilitate efficient and accurate diagnostic procedures, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using 3.0 t system

1

Multimodal MRI Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent an MRI scan of the brain on a 3.0-T system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, United States) using an eight-channel phased-array head coil. The standard protocol for MS studies was performed including a conventional axial 2D dual-echo proton density (PD)-T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) [repetition time (TR) = 2,900 ms, echo time (TE)1 = 25 ms, TE2 = 93 ms, echo train length [ETL) = 12, matrix size = 256 × 192] and 2D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) (TR = 2,050 ms, TE = 24 ms, TI = 750 ms, matrix size = 256 × 256). All axial scans were taken from the roof of the skull to the foramen magnum [slice thickness = 5 mm, slice skip = 0 mm, field of view (FOV) = 24 cm × 24 cm].
ESWAN data were acquired with eight echoes using the following parameters: TR = 60 ms, TE = 6 ms, number of excitation (NEX) = 0.75, FOV = 22 cm × 22 cm, matrix size = 448 × 320, receiver bandwidth = + 62.5 kHz, and flip angle = 20°. The sequence was acquired with 2-mm-thick contiguous sections and no space. All scans were oriented parallel to the anterior–posterior commissural (AC-PC) line with 56–64 locations on the middle sagittal plane and covered the entire brain area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric MRI Imaging of ICC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRI scans of all the ICC patients were performed using a 3.0-T system (GE Healthcare; Siemens Healthcare). A 16-channel phased-array torso coil was used for all measurements. The mpMRI sequences included fast low-angle shot T1-weighted imaging in/out-of-phase, breath-hold fat-suppressed turbo spin-echo T2WI, MRCP, DWI, and dynamic multiphase enhanced imaging. The contrast agent (Omniscan, GE Healthcare) was injected with a dose of 0.2 ml/kg at a rate of 3 ml/s and then immediately followed by a flush of 30 ml saline. The images in the arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delayed phase were obtained at 30, 60, and 180 s after injection of the contrast agent. The detailed MRI scanning parameters are shown in Table E1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cervical Spine Degeneration Pattern Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected the case data of neck symptomatic cases (include neck pain, shoulder pain, neck stiffness, upper limb pain or numbness) who sought care at Xijing hospital from 2017 to 2021. After excluding cervical spine fractures, tumors, and patients who had received cervical spine surgery, a total of 102 patients (64 males, 38 females, average age = 50.44 ± 10.63) were included in the study (all information of the patients was shown in Table S1). There were 27 cases in the ~45 group, 69 cases in the 46 ~ 65 group and 6 cases in the ~66 group. IDD severity was assessed by three blinded spine surgeons according to the Miyazaki grading system by images of MRI.11 MRI was performed using a 3.0T system (GE) to obtain T2‐weighted images (repetition time, 2480 ms; echo time, 104 ms; field of view, 32 mm × 32 mm; slice thickness, 3.5 mm). FJD severity was assessed by the other three blinded spine surgeons according to the Pathria's grading system12 according to images of CT. IVDs and FJs of three segments (C3‐C4, C4‐C5, and C5‐C6) were evaluated. Patients with moderate IDD (Grade 1–2) and severe FJD (Grade 3–4) were grouped into FJ severe degeneration group. And patients with moderate FJD (Grade 1–2) and severe IDD (Grade 3–5) were grouped into IVD severe degeneration group. The rest was classified as FJ and IVD degeneration group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radiographic and MRI Analysis of Intervertebral Disc

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty-eight days after the initial surgical procedure, six rats were randomly selected for radiography and MRI before they were sacrificed. Lateral radiographs were taken at each time point (exposure time, 0.06 s; distance, 100 cm; current, 160 mA; voltage, 50 kV) using the DRX-Ascend system (Carestream). Prone-position MRI was performed using a 3.0 T system (GE) to obtain T2-weighted images (repetition time, 1 600 ms; echo time, 85 ms; field of view, 80 × 80 mm; slice thickness, 2.0 mm). Micro-CT was performed on 6-month-old mice (four wild-type [WT] and four Col2a1CreBmal1fl/fl [cKO]) for quantitative disc height evaluation. The NP water content was detected by MRI T2-weighted images (repetition time, 1 800 ms; echo time, 102 ms; field of view, 49 × 49 mm; slice thickness, 1.5 mm). The relative signal intensity for mouse NP tissues was calculated using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Breast MRI Contrast Enhancement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Breast MRI was performed using a GE 3.0T system with an eight-channel breast coil. DCE-MRI was acquired using the three-dimensional volume imaging for breast assessment (VIBRANT) sequence in axial view to cover both breasts, with TR = 5 ms; TE = 2 ms; FA = 10°; slice thickness = 1.2 mm without gap; FOV = 34 × 34 cm2; and matrix size = 416 × 416. The DCE-MRI series consisted of six frames: one pre-contrast (F1) and five post-contrast (F2–F6). The contrast agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Bayer Schering Pharma), at a dosage of 0.1 mmol/kg, was intravenously injected after the pre-contrast frame was acquired, followed by 20 ml saline flush. The injection rate was 2.5 ml/s using a power injector, so the injection of the contrast medium and saline could be completed in 20 s. The acquisition time for each DCE frame was 1 min 32 s. The k-space was sampled using the rectilinear trajectory, with the central line acquired in the middle at 46 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Bone Marrow Changes Post-Transplant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI scans of the tibia and the abdomen were performed 1, 30, and 225 days after transplantation on a clinical 3.0 T system (Sigma, General Electric, USA).The resultant images were quantitatively analyzed by manually counting the area of hypo-intense spots visible in the bone marrow tissue in each slice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Rectal Cancer MRI and CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After bowel preparation, all patients underwent pelvic MRI examinations with 3.0-T system (GE Medical System, Milwaukee, WI, USA) using eight-channel body phased array coil. Oblique axial, sagittal, and coronal T2-weighted MRI were obtained for all the patients. The parameters were as follows: echo time (TE)/repetition time (TR) of 102/4600, 102/4600, and 102/2780, respectively; thickness of 3 mm, slice interval of 1mm, matrix of 256 × 256, field of view of 25 × 25 to 28 × 28 cm. In our institution, we kept to this protocol for every rectal cancer patient for staging and all the patients also underwent contrast-enhanced chest and abdominal CT examinations for detecting distant metastasis on a dual-source multi-detector CT (Siemens Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Medical Solution, Forchheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preoperative Evaluation and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Recanalization Surgery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent six-vessel DSA preoperatively to evaluate the status of the vessels including the length of stenosis or occlusion, the contralateral VA stenosis or occlusion; the collaterals from extracranial (ascending cervical artery, deep cervical artery, and muscular branches at the level of C1 or C2) and intracranial system (posterior communicating artery) were recorded. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed pre- and postoperatively to evaluate ischemic lesions by using a 3.0-T system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA). The imaging protocol included T1, T2-weighted spin-echo and diffusion-weighted imaging series. The slice thickness was 5 mm and the intersection gap was 1.6 mm. All the data were assessed by an experienced board-certified neuro-radiologist. BA blood flow changes resulting from the disease process and at 6 months after the recanalization surgery were measured using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography with non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA, VasSol, Inc., Chicago, Illinois).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Radiological Evaluation of Disc Degeneration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice and rats were treated as indicated. Before radiology evaluation, mice and rats were euthanized by inhaling an excessive amount of isoflurane. Lateral radiographs were taken (exposure time, 0.06 s; distance, 100 cm; current, 160 mA; voltage,50 kV) using the DRX-Ascend system (Carestream). Prone-position MRI was performed using a 3.0 T system (GE) to obtain T2-weighted images (repetition time, 1600 ms; echo time, 85 ms; field of view, 80 × 80 mm; slice thickness, 2.0 mm). Micro-CT was performed by the high-resolution micro-CT scanner (Bruker, Skyscan1276), for quantitative disc height evaluation. The modified Pfirrmann grading system was employed to evaluate the degree of disc degeneration by MRI scan [ 70 ]. The disc height index (DHI) was calculated as previously described [ 75 ], and the DHI percentage (DHI%) was calculated as DHI of Cy7-8÷DHI of Cy8-9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!