The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Daf fm da

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

DAF-FM DA is a fluorescent indicator used for the detection and measurement of nitric oxide (NO) in biological samples. It reacts with NO to form a fluorescent benzotriazole compound, allowing for the quantification of NO levels.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

67 protocols using daf fm da

1

Quantifying Pulmonary NO Bioavailability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lungs freshly isolated from mice were perfused slowly via the pulmonary artery to flush blood with Krebs HEPES buffer (KHB, pH 7.35), and immersed in Tissue Plus® OCT compound (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# 23730571, Houston, TX, USA). Cryostat transverse cuts (5 μm) of lung sections were freshly prepared at -20°C. For determination of NO bioavailability using 4-Amino-5-Methylamino-2',7'-Difluorofluorescein Diacetate (DAF-FM DA) fluorescent probe as a recognized method detecting intracellular levels of NO [38 ], lung tissue sections were incubated with 20 μM DAF-FM DA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat# D23844, Houston, TX, USA) for 20 min in dark at 37°C. After being washed for 3 times, the sections were coverslipped. The fluorescent images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse Ti confocal microscope (Tokyo, Japan) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 495 and 515 nm respectively, and six randomly selected fields in each section were quantified with the NIH Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Intracellular ROS and RNS in VEGF-D Treated HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements of the intracellular reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS) production in the VEGF‐D‐treated HUVECs were performed by monitoring the oxidation of 2′,7′‐dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF DA) and 4‐amino‐5‐methylamino‐2′,7′‐difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF‐FM DA), respectively (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Assays were performed in the 96‐well microplates, in a HBSS solution containing 5.5 mM glucose, pH 7.4. After 12 hrs of HUVEC starvation, VEGF‐D was added for 4, 8, 12 and 24 hrs. The experimental medium was then replaced to HBSS with 5‐μM probe, and the fluorescence was monitored for 1 hr using Fluoroskan Ascent FL microplate reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Labeling Peritoneal Macrophages with DAF-FM DA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peritoneal exudate cells were obtained from the ascites liquid. A 50-μL aliquot was taken from the sample and centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min, then the supernatant was removed and 10 µL of the working solution of the 4-amino-5-methylamino-2’, 7’-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM DA) (Thermo Scientific, Eugene, OR, USA) fluorescent probe was deposited at a concentration of 5 µM, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in the dark. Then, 500 μL of sterile PBS were added and centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, 500 µL of PBS were added, and it was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min in the dark. It was then centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded [18 (link)]. The cell packet labeled with the DAF-FM DA probe was prepared for peritoneal macrophage labeling. In total, 4 µL of the anti-F4/80 monoclonal antibody labeled with APC (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) was deposited and incubated for 30 min at ambient temperature in darkness. Subsequently, 500 μL of FACSFlow was added, centrifuged at 3000× g for 5 min, and the supernatant was removed. The cell packet was resuspended in 200 μL of FACSFlow to be evaluated in the FACS Canto II (BD) flow cytometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying NO Production in HUVECs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NO production was semi-quantified using the NO-sensitive fluorescence dye, DAF-FM DA (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Briefly, serum-starved HUVECs were first loaded with DAF-FM DA (1 μM) for 15 min at 37°C. Subsequently, cells were gently washed twice with PBS. HUVECs were treated with 1 μM IMZ for 20 min. Next, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The fluorescence of the NO-sensitive dye was examined by fluorescence microscopy (EVOS, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and quantified by ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Nitric Oxide in Root Tips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NO was measured using the ubiquitous NO detecting fluorescent dye DAF-FM-DA (4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate, Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the protocol of McInnis et al. (2006) (link) with minor modifications. Root tips were excised from the treated bulbs and immediately immersed in 1 × PBS for 15 min followed by transfer to 2 μM solution of DAF-FM-DA in 1 × PBS and incubation for 15 min. The root tips were then washed in PBS and viewed under the confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus, Japan) (1 × CLSM 81) at excitation and emission of 495/515 nm. Images of the root tips showing bright green spots of NO localization were captured using the software version FluoView FV1000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Nitric Oxide Levels in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To capture a snap shot of NO level in live cells after laminin addition, a dye DAF-FM DA (4-amino-5-methylamino-2',7'-difluorofluorescein diacetate, ThermoFisher Scientific) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The signal intensity/area/cell was measured with ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fluorescent Probes for ROS and RNS Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The kit CellROX® Deep Red (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) for flow cytometry assay was used for the determination of ROS and the dye (4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein) diacetate (DAF-FM DA) (Thermo Scientific, Eugene, OR, USA) was used to determine RNS. The fluorescent probes were used at a 5 µM concentration for labeling purposes. For this reason, the macrophages, bacteria and supernatants were suspended in a 98 µL final volume [26 (link),27 (link)]. The labeling procedure was started 60 min before the end of the incubation time for each assay. First, the CellROX® Deep Red (5 µM) probe was added and the tubes were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in the dark. After that, the DAF-FM DA probe (5 µM) was added to the tubes and they were incubated for another 30 min. A separated tube of macrophages with the same assay conditions were labeled with 4 μL of conjugated-APC monoclonal antibody anti-mouse F4/80 (Thermo Scientific, Eugene, OR, USA), incubating this for 30 min in darkness [28 (link)]. The analysis was performed on a BD FACSLyric™ Flow Cytometry System (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Intracellular Nitric Oxide Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular NO production was detected by fluorescence microscopy using the NO-specific probe 4-amino-5-methylamino-2,7-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM-DA, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. GECs were grown on glass coverslips in 24-well plates (30,000 cells per well). After stimulations, the cells were washed with pre-warmed PBS (with Mg2+ and Ca2+) and incubated with diluted DAF-FM-DA (5 µM, in PBS with Mg2+ and Ca2+) for 20 min at 37 °C. The cells were then washed to remove excess probes and incubated in fresh CSC complete medium for 30 min, allowing complete de-esterification of the intercellular diacetates. The cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and visualized using a fluorescence microscope (Eclipse 600, Nikon), equipped with a 495-nm excitation and 515-nm emission filter. Mean fluorescence intensity per cell was analyzed using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Intracellular Calcium and NO Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and penicillin/streptomycin solution were purchased from GIBCO (Grand Island, NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Merck (Sacramento, CA, USA); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and 3-(4-5-dimethyl-2yl)-2-5-diphynyltetrasolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The intracellular NO production was detected using DAF-FM DA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA); the total NO production was measured using the Griess assay (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Calcium levels were quantified using Fluo-4-AM dye (1-[2-amino-5-(2,7-difluoro-6-hydroxy-3-oxo-9-xanthenyl) phenoxyl]-2-(2-amino-5-methylphenoxy) ethane-N, N, N′, N′-tetraacetic acid, pentaacetoxymethyl ester) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA ). Atropine, a specific AchR antagonist, was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. SU5416, a VEGFR2 inhibitor, was obtained from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fluorescent Staining and Imaging of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescent staining and imaging were carried out as previously described (Davidson et al., 2004 (link)). The following fluorescent dyes were used: 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM DA) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, United States) was used to detect presence of NO; wheat-germ agglutinin WGA Alexa Flour 633 (Thermo Fisher) was used to stain mucus; and, Cell Tracker Orange (Thermo Fisher) was used to label host tissues. The confocal fluorescent microscopy was performed using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscopy (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany), stationed at the University of Hawai’i, Mānoa (UHM), Kewalo Marine Laboratory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!