The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using nb400 144

1

Multi-Tissue Histological Analysis of Metabolism

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epididymal adipose tissue, brown adipose tissue, liver, small intestines (3 different regions from proximal 10 cm at regular intervals) were formalin-fixed overnight at 4 °C and embedded in paraffin. Five micron sections were taken and stained for haematoxylin & eosin (H&E) to study tissue morphology. Picrosirius red (PSR) staining was used to visualize fibrillary collagen as reported previously26 (link). Adipocyte size was measured in H&E sections using ImageJ software (100 cells/mouse, n = 4/group). For Oil Red O (ORO) staining of tissue neutral lipids, liver and skeletal muscle were embedded in tissue freezing medium immediately after dissection and stored at −80 °C. Five micron sections were used for staining and processed according to the protocol described previously27 (link). Liver sections were stained with ORO for 15 minutes whereas skeletal muscle was stained for an hour. Adipose tissue inflammation was determined by staining for macrophages (F4/80 antibodies; AbD Serotec #MCA). Pancreas and small intestine sections were stained for TIMP4 (Abcam #ab51207) and also for pancreatic lipase (Santacruz #sc-393085) and CD36 (Novus Biologicals #NB400–144) respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing Adipose Tissue Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded visceral adipose tissue sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Immunohistochemical staining with anti-mouse F4/80 (Abcam Cat# ab6640, RRID: AB_1140040) or anti-CD36 (Novus Cat# NB 400-144, RRID:AB_522498) was performed to visualize the macrophage infiltration or the expression and localization of CD36 in adipose tissue. All images were captured using a Zeiss microscope. Image analysis was performed with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating CD36 and Macrophage Expression in Kidney Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FFPE sections were treated for 1 h in an antigen retrieval solution and incubated with a protein blocking solution for 20 min before incubation with the rabbit polyclonal anti-CD36 antibody (Novus, NB400-144) for 1h at 1:1,600. An isotype rabbit IgG Ab was used as a control. Sections were then incubated with a goat anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated Ab for 30 min at 1:200 followed by DAB Chromogen for 5 min. Sections were counterstained, coverslipped and digitally captured. IHC for CD36 was performed on kidney sections from a KO mouse and a WT mouse, both subjected to 5/6Nx+AngII. IHC for F4/80+ cells (Ab from AbD Serotec, cat#MCA497GA) was performed in FFPE kidney sections from all UUO groups (N=4/group) and the number of positive cells counted in 10 randomly selected high-power fields (400×).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of ER Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to 0.45 μm polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon, Millipore. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Blots were incubated with antibodies directed against CD36 (NB400-144), ATF6 (NBP1-40256), and CHOP (NB600-1335) purchased from Novus Biologicals (Bio-Techne LD-R&D Systems Europe Ltd., Abingdon, UK). Equal loading of protein in each lane was verified by β-actin (A5441, Sigma–Aldrich, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Cell-Surface CD36 Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell-surface delivery of CD36 was quantified as previously described. [22 (link)] Briefly, L6-GLUT4myc myoblasts were plated at a cell density of 3 × 105 cells/well into 8-well chamber slides and allowed to attach overnight. Cells were then treated with insulin or ionomycin as described above in the presence of the exocyst inhibitor endosidin 2 (ES2) or DMSO as control. Heterozygous EXOC5 knockout (ΔEXOC5) cells were stimulated with 100 nM insulin or 1 μM ionomycin in parallel with the appropriate controls, as described above. Following fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde and blocking with 5% BSA in PBS, surface CD36 was detected using a primary antibody targeting the extracellular domain of CD36 (Rabbit, Cat# NB400-144, Novus) diluted 1:100 in 5% BSA in PBS. Following subsequent permeabilization in 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, the cells were incubated with an anti-β-tubulin primary antibody (Mouse, Proteintech, sc-5274) diluted 1:100 as control. Cells were then incubated with IRDye secondary antibodies (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) diluted at 1:15,000. The chamber slides were scanned using the Odyssey Clx scanner. Densitometry was then performed with Image Studio software (LI-COR Biosciences). Surface CD36 signal intensity was normalized with total β-tubulin levels measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Hepatic HIF2α and CD36

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin‐embedded liver biopsy sections (4 µm thick) were immunostained with a primary rabbit antibody against HIF2α (ab199, Abcam) 28 or CD36 (NB400‐144, Novus) diluted to 1:50 and 1:200 respectively, using the DAKO EnVision™+ System (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) as described by the manufacturer. Liver tissue area occupied by nuclear HIF2α or CD36‐positive cells was quantified from the images taken using an optical microscope Nikon Eclipse E400 (Nikon). Image analysis procedures were performed with the FIJI software (NIH). Values were obtained in six different lobular areas where hepatocytes are the predominant cell type. The average value was considered as nuclear HIF2α or CD36 expression index for each liver biopsy sample, and expressed as percentage of positive nuclei or arbitrary units respectively, which reflects the intensity of the immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

IHC Scoring of CD36 and CAIX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed according to a previously reported standard protocol.18 (link) CD36 antibody (NB400-144, rabbit, diluted 1:300; Novus Biologicals) and CAIX antibody (NB100-417, rabbit, diluted 1:500; Novus Biologicals) were used for the IHC assessment. Based on intensity, the staining was graded/scored as no staining (0), weak staining (1), moderate staining (2), and strong staining (3). The number of positively stained GC cells was divided into the following four ranges (proportion score): ≤5% (0), 6–25% (1), 26–50% (2), and >51% (3). The final staining score was calculated using the following formula: overall score = intensity score × proportion score. A final score of ≤4 was defined as negative staining and >4 as positive staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing CD36 and N-cadherin in Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin‐embedded liver biopsy sections (4 μm thick) were co‐incubated with an anti‐CD36 antibody (NB400‐144, Novus) and anti‐N‐cadherin antibody (BP1‐48309, Novus), diluted to 1:200 and 1:25 respectively, following with the appropriated conjugated secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor® 568 goat anti‐rabbit IgG (A11011, Life Technologies) or Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti‐mouse IgG (A11029, Life Technologies). The immunofluorescence‐mounting medium used was Fluoromont G® (BioNova cientifica). Representative images were taken using a confocal microscope Leica TCS SP5 X (Leica, Barcelona, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enterocyte Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were homogenized in ice-cold sigma buffer (Sigma Aldrich #C3228) with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. Enterocytes were harvested from the proximal segment of the small intestine (proximal 10 cm) after the intestine was rinsed with cold PBS to remove luminal contents. Homogenates were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 15 minutes at 4 °C and supernatants were collected. Protein concentration was determined by DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad #5000116) and 40 μg of protein were resolved by electrophoresis on SDS-8% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes and were detected by the following primary antibodies: TIMP4 (Abcam #ab51207) and CD36 (Novus Biologicals #NB400-144). Respective HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were used to detect immunoreactivity. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the ECL kit and band intensities were quantified by ImageJ software. Coomassie blue-stained gel was used as internal loading controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying CD36 Expression in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of CD36 in paraffin-embedded tumoral and peritumoral tissues was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using the CD36 antibody NB400-144 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA). Each sample, with a 5-µm thick section, was processed using the BenchMark Ultra Ventana. The deparaffinization of the samples (72 °C for 16 min) was followed by antigen retrieval for 56 min at pH 8 at 100 °C (Ultra CC1). Endogenous peroxidase activity was then blocked for 5 min. The incubation with CD36 primary antibody (36°C for 36 min) was followed by incubation with OptiView HRP Multimer (36 °C, 8 min) and OptiViewDAB (36 °C, 8 min). Counterstaining was carried out with hematoxylin (36 °C, 16 min) and post-counterstaining with bluing reagent (36 °C, 8 min). The slides were examined by a pathologist using a DM750 light microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH). CD36 expression levels were evaluated by calculating the percentage of positive tumoral cells. The images were acquired using the Axiocam 305 Color (ZEISS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!