The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using waters 2690 hplc system

1

Drug Loading and Release from Hydrogel Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-drug loading measurements were performed by incubating 150 mg of ACS hydrogel with 1.2 mL of drug solutions in PBS at 0.5–2 μg mL −1 for DOX and 25–100 μg mL −1 for GEM, for 48 h at RT. After loading, the drug-depleted supernatant was collected to collected to quantify the amount of drug absorbed in the hydrogel. An aliquot of 150 mg of loaded hydrogel was then combined with 1 mL of 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4, and placed in an orbital shaker at 50 rpm at 37°C. At selected time points, 200 μL of supernatant was withdrawn and replenished with PBS. After the release studies, samples containing DOX (loading supernatant and time point collections) were analyzed by fluorescent spectroscopy on a Biotek Synergy H1 Microplate Reader (Agilent, Winooski, VT) at λex = 480 nm and λem = 580 nm. Samples containing GEM were analyzed using liquid chromatography on a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with an Aeris 3.6 μm C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm). The chromatographic method utilized an isocratic 5% acetonitrile in water (0.1% v/v formic acid) for 5 min, while monitoring the effluent via UV spectrophotometry at 290 nm. GEM concentration was determined by integrating the peak area. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dual-Drug Loading in ACS Hydrogel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-drug loading experiments were performed by incubating 150 mg of ACS hydrogel with 1.2 mL of drug solution at either low (25 μg mL−1 GEM and 0.5 μg mL−1 DOX in PBS) or high concentration (50 μg mL −1 GEM and 1 μg mL −1 DOX in PBS) for 48 h at RT. After loading, the drug-depleted supernatant was collected to quantify drug loading. Drug loading, supernatant sampling, and quantification of DOX release were performed as described in Section 2.3. The collected samples were analyzed using a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with an Aeris 3.6 μm C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm). The chromatographic method utilized a 5–100% gradient of acetonitrile (0.1% v/v formic acid) in water (0.1% v/v formic acid) over 10 min, while monitoring the effluent via UV spectrophotometry at 290 nm. GEM concentration was determined by integrating the peak area. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of CAZ and RvD1 in Nanovesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CAZ in nanovesicles was determined using a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA), with mobile phase using methanol: 20 mM KH2PO4 pH 3.5 = 25 : 75 at 1 ml/min. The separating column was Restek C18 25 cm × 4.6 μm. The signal was collected at 260 nm. The RvD1 quantitation was done using an Acquity I-Class Ultra pressure liquid chromatography system, containing a PDA eλ detector, an Xevo G2-S QTof mass detector and a binary solvent manager (Waters, Milford, MA), with a C18 column 100 × 2.1 mm. The column temperature was set at 50 °C. The flow phase contained a solvent A (water with NH4F 5 mM and formic acid 2 mM) and a solvent B (acetonitrile). The flow phase was initially set at 35% B for 0.5 min, then increased to 100% in 3 min, and finally maintained at 100% B for 2 min. UV absorption wavelength at 301 nm was used to monitor signal of RvD1. Flow speed was maintained at 0.5 ml/min. The peak of RvD1 was verified by mass spectrum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gel Filtration Purification of Bioactive Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gastrointestinal digest was re-dissolved in 10 mg/mL elution buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer with 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.3) and filtered (0.45 µm), before being applied to a gel filtration Superdex® Peptide 10/300 GL (30 cm × 10 mm, 13 μm, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA). Elution was carried out at room temperature on a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), equipped with an automatic sample injector and 2998 UV photodiode array (PDA) detector, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The absorbance of each fraction was measured at a wavelength of 214 nm. After collection, fractions were concentrated, reconstituted in assay buffers, then the bioactivities were measured, as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Fimasartan in Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FMS concentrations in biological samples were determined by a modification of the previously reported LC-MS/MS assay [22 ]. Briefly, 200 μL of acetonitrile and 50 μL of the internal standard solution (BR-A-563 100 ng/mL in acetonitrile) were added to 50 μL of the thawed biological samples and mixed on a vortex mixer for 1 min. The sample mixture was then centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant was transferred to a polypropylene tube and diluted with the same volume of distilled water. A volume of 10 μL was injected into LC-MS/MS.
The LC-MS/MS comprised API 2000 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Sciex, Toronto, Canada) coupled with Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA). Fimasartan was separated on a Kinetex C18 column 50 × 2.10 mm, i.d., 2.6 μm (Phenomenex, Torrence, CA). The isocratic mobile phase composition was a mixture of acetonitrile and 0.05 % formic acid in water (40:60, v/v). The flow rate of the mobile phase was set at 0.2 mL/min, and the column oven temperature was 30 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated using electron spray ionization (ESI) with positive ion mode. The transition of the precursors to the product ion was monitored at 502.3→207.0 for fimasartan, and 526.4→207.2 for the internal standard (BR-A-563).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of B-FAHF-2 and FAHF-2 Formulas

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The instruments used were a Waters 2690 HPLC system coupled to a 2996 PDA detector (Waters, Milford, MA). B-FAHF-2 tablets were ground, and a 22.5 mg/mL solution was prepared using 1:1 ratio of mobile phase mixture. The B-FAHF-2 solution was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes. 10μL of the supernatant was injected into the HPLC system and separated on a ZORBAX SB-C18 (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) column (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). The mobile phase A was made of 0.1% of formic acid aqueous solution. Mobile phase B was acetonitrile. The separation was performed at 1 min/mL flow rate following a linear gradient elution of 2–25% mobile phase B in 45 min, 25–35% B in the following 25 min, 35–55% in the next 15 min, 55–75% in another 10 min. This mobile phase composition was maintained for 5 min and then rapidly switched to 2% mobile phase B. An equivalent amount of FAHF-2 formula, 99 mg/mL, was also prepared following the same procedure as for B-FAHF-2. 10μL of FAHF-2 supernatant was analyzed on the HPLC system. Data was collected and processed with Waters' Empower software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Structural Analysis of N-Glycans from Cryptococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cwMPs were isolated from C. neoformans cells as described previously (30 (link), 53 (link)). N-linked glycans were released from the purified cwMPs using PNGase F (New England Biolabs) and were purified over a Carbograph Extract-Clean (Grace) column. The N-glycans were labeled with 2-aminobenzoic acid (2-AA; Sigma) and purified using a Cyano Base cartridge (Bond Elut-CN-E; Agilent) (100 mg) to remove excess 2-AA. Purified N-glycans were reacted with α-1,2 mannosidase (α-1,2 MNS; Prozyme) and subsequently with α-1,6 mannosidase (α-1,6 MNS; New England Biolabs). To remove enzymes, the N-glycans were purified using a 30K Microcon device (Millipore). 2-AA-labeled oligosaccharides were analyzed with a Waters 2690 HPLC system and a 2475 fluorescence detector with excitation and emission wavelengths of 360 nm and 425 nm, respectively. Data were collected using Empower 2 software (Waters). For MALDI-TOF analysis, the matrix solution was prepared as previously described (53 (link)) and was mixed with samples of equal volume. Mixed glycan samples were spotted on a MSP 96 polished-steel target (Bruker Daltonics). Crystallized samples were analyzed using a Microflex mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SCFA and BCFA Analysis in Fermentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fermentation supernatants and inoculum of the twelve donors used in the fermentation study were analysed for SCFA and BCFA contents, by using a Waters 2690 HPLC system (Waters) fitted with an Aminex HPX-87 H column (300 mm × 78 mm; Bio-Rad Laboratories) combined with a Waters 486 tuneable absorbance detector set at 210 nm.
In vitro fermentation data were corrected for the content of the blanks, as well as the inocula. The sterile bottle containing 15 ml of fermentation supernatants was vortexed for 1 min, and 2 ml aliquot was centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for 15 min. Aliquot (1•5 ml) of the supernatants was transferred to a vial, and pH was adjusted to between one and three, using 0•1M HCl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!