The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gamete buffer

Manufactured by Cook Medical
Sourced in United States

Gamete buffer is a laboratory product designed to maintain the optimal pH and osmolality conditions for the handling and preservation of gametes, such as sperm and oocytes, during various assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. It is a specialized solution that provides a controlled environment to support the viability and function of these reproductive cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using gamete buffer

1

Mitochondrial Activity Assay in Oocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
20 MII oocytes from each experimental group were stained with 0.2 mM of Mito Tracker Green fluorochrome for 5 min at 37°C (42 (link)). After washing them three times by gamete buffer (Cook, Bloomington, Indiana‎, USA), the oocytes were placed in glass bottom cell culture dishes and were observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope with 490 nm filters. After 3 replications, the fluorescence intensity of the 40 oocytes was quantified and analyzed by Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sperm Cryopreservation and RNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After collection by masturbation, sperm samples were liquefied at room temperature for 30–60 min. Semen volume, sperm concentration and motility were evaluated following the WHO guidelines [1 ]. The SpermFreeze™ medium (FertiPro NV, Beernem, Belgium) was added to the sperm in drops while gently swirling (0.7 mL of medium per ml of sperm). During the 10 min incubation for equilibration at room temperature, the mixture was sucked into the CBS High Security sperm straws (Cryo Bio System, L’Aigle, France) that were placed in liquid nitrogen vapor phase for 15 min. Then the straws were quickly transferred to liquid nitrogen and stored at −196 °C for one week.
To thaw, the straws were removed from the liquid nitrogen and warmed at room temperature until the sample thawed. Then the end of the straw was cut off and the semen–medium mixture was put into a tube containing 1 mL of Gamete buffer (Cook Medical) prewarmed at 37 °C. After centrifugation at 1400 rpm for 10 min the pellet was transferred into the QIAzol® Lysis Reagent (Qiagen) and processed as described below.
We checked the percentage of round cells in our samples, and it was very low, with an average 5% (range 0–20%) of the sperm count.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Oocyte Vitrification and Warming Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oocytes were vitrified using commercial kits (Irvine Scientific CA) and closed vitrification devices (CryoTip). The oocytes were washed in a drop of hepes-buffered medium (gamete buffer Cook) and, subsequently in three drops of equilibration solution containing ethylene glycol (EG) (7.5% vol/vol) and dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) (7.5% vol/vol). After 8 minutes, eggs were transferred into a vitrification solution drop containing 15% vol/vol EG, 15% vol/vol DMSO, and 0.5 mol/L sucrose, for a total of 20 seconds before being loaded into a Cryotip and sealed properly at both ends. The device was directly plunged into liquid nitrogen and stored.
Oocytes were rapidly warmed by transferring the Cryotip directly from liquid nitrogen to a 37°C water bath for 3 seconds. The device was cut at the end and the oocyte/s released in a thawing solution (1.0 mol/L sucrose) for a minute then moved to a dilution media (0.5 mol/L sucrose) for 4 minutes and finally washed twice in a washing solution (6 minutes). Survived oocytes were cultured in Cleavage medium (Cook) before the fixation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Semen Analysis and Sperm Selection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semen samples were collected by masturbation after an abstinence period of 3–5 days and just after egg retrieval by donor ovarian pick-up. After liquefaction, the parameters analyzed included: volume, concentration and motility. The methodology and criteria for assessing semen quality were those established by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010). Sperm selection was performed in 40 % and 80 % discontinuous density gradients using PURESPERM (Nidacon International AB, Sweden). After 20' centrifugation at 300 x g, the pellet was recovered, washed with 3 ml of Gamete Buffer (CookMedical, Ireland) and centrifuged again for 10 'at 500 x g. Finally, the supernatant was removed and Fertilization Medium (CookMedical, Ireland) was added, adjusting the volume according to on the pellet recovered. The samples were incubated at 37 °C and 6 % CO2 until insemination [61 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Normospermic Male Fertility Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semen samples were collected from 13 normospermic men from April to May 2022. They did not have a male infertility factor and came to our center because of a female infertility factor. Eight donors (60%) had a healthy baby. The remaining 5 are still performing ART cycles.
The men enrolled in this study had a median age of 35.0 years (range: 29.0–46.0). Age and semen parameters of the 13 donors enrolled in the study are listed in Table S5.
Each sample was divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was washed in 1 mL of Gamete buffer (Cook Medical, Sydney, Australia) prewarmed at 37 °C. After centrifugation at 1400 rpm for 10 min, the pellet was transferred into the QIAzol® Lysis Reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and total RNA was immediately extracted as described below. The second aliquot was frozen and total RNA was extracted after a week of storage in liquid nitrogen. The 13 paired RNA samples passed quality control and were randomized in 4 pools, each of 6 donors, in order to minimize any man-specific variability in gene expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Oocyte Denudation and Vitrification for ICSI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collected COC were washed and incubated individually in Fertilization medium (Cook Medical, USA) under mineral oil for 1 h before denudation. Denudation was performed in 30 μl droplets of Gamete Buffer (Cook Medical, USA) containing 80 IU hyaluronidase (HYASE, Vitrolife, Sweden) for 30 s, and then washed in two 30 μl droplets of enzyme-free Gamete Buffer.
Whenever a BC patient had a male partner, ICSI was performed on a variable proportion of mature oocytes (MII), according to patient’s decision. Embryos obtained were vitrified at 2PN or cleavage stage. If the patient was single, all MII oocytes were directly vitrified after denudation.
In the control group, all MII oocytes were subjected to ICSI. Embryo transfer was performed on day 3 or 5 of culture and the remaining good quality embryos were vitrified according to local protocol. Oocytes and embryos were handled individually in both groups to allow CC per oocyte analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ovarian Tissue Harvesting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
When performed the combined procedure, immediately following the AIVM process, laparoscopy for ovarian tissue harvesting was performed. During laparoscopic surgery approximately two-thirds of the ovarian cortex from one ovary was harvested and immediately placed in gamete buffer (Cook Medical, Bloomington, USA) and transferred to the IVF laboratory (in the adjacent room) where it was prepared for cryopreservation. Bleeding during the procedure was controlled with cautery (Donnez et al., 2013; Meirow et al., 2005 Meirow et al., , 2014)) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!