The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using vincristine

1

Chemotherapeutic-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Treatment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemotherapeutics including paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and vincristine (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) per the following dose regimens: paclitaxel 2 mg/kg i.p. four times on alternate days (1, 3, 5, 7), vincristine 0.1 mg/kg i.p. over 12 days, with two 5-day cycles and a 2-day break in between and, oxaliplatin once at 6 mg/kg i.p. The sEHI EC5026 and EC5029 treatments tested on the established CIPN models were formulated as true solutions in PEG400 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis MO) which was tested as the vehicle, and all compounds were administered by oral gavage. Morphine sulfate was formulated in saline (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and administered by subcutaneous injection. Pregabalin (Tocris, Minneapolis, MN) was formulated in water and administered by oral gavage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Vascularized MPS Drug Effects Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To demonstrate the application of the vascularized MPS for studies of drug effects, microfluidic devices and 2D cell cultures of endothelial and tumor cells were exposed to three test compounds. FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs Fluorouracil (5-FU, S1209; concentrations tested: 1, 10, 100, 300, 1000 μM), Vincristine (S1241; concentrations tested: 1, 10, 100, 300, 1000 nM), and Sorafenib (S7397; concentrations tested: 0.1, 1, 10, 30, 100 μM), were purchased from Selleckchem (Houston, TX). All test compounds were dissolved in 100% cell culture grade dimethyl sulfate (DMSO, Fisher Scientific) to 200 mM for 5-FU and Vincristine and 20 mM for Sorafenib (i.e., 200× of the top test concentration). Final concentration of DMSO vehicle was 0.5% v/v in all conditions. Drug or vehicle treatments were introduced to the microfluidic devices through cell culture medium channels and reservoirs on day 6 post-loading. The interstitial flow was maintained by transferring cell culture medium from the outlet reservoir to the inlet reservoir daily to re-establish the interstitial pressure. Cell culture medium with drugs and/or vehicle was replaced with fresh EGM-2 on day 8 and the devices were monitored for another 2 days until day 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-throughput Drug Screening in HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 or HB214 (1500 cells/well) was seeded on a 384 well plate in 30 μl. Drugs were added after 24 h. Cell Titer Glo (CTG) viability assay was conducted after 72 h of drug treatment. Briefly, CellTiter-Glo 2.0 (#G9243 Promega) was added to each well in a 1:1 v/v ratio. Plates were then covered to keep from light and incubated at RT on an orbital shaker at 150 RPM for 30 mins. After the incubation, plate was read on a synergy H4 plate reader for luminescence. Dose effect curves for each drug were calculated using Prism software, version 9 (GraphPad). For drug combinations, responses were analyzed using SynergyFinder2.050 (link). Drugs used include cisplatin (#479036-5 G, Sigma Aldrich), gemcitabine (#AC456890010, Fisher Scientific), vincristine (#AAJ60907MA, Fisher Scientific), triapine (#50-136-4826, Fisher Scientific), MK1775 (#M4102, LKT laboratories, Saint Paul, Minnesota), doxorubicin (#BP25161, Fisher Scientific), sorafenib (#NC0749948, Fisher Scientific), SN-38 (#S4908-50MG, Selleck Chemicals, Harris County, Texas), deferoxamine mesylate (#AC461770010, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), KU60019 (#S1570, Selleck Chemicals). All concentrations were seeded in triplicate and the experiment was repeated three times. Significance was determined using the Extra Sum of Squares f test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!