The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Methylation arrays

Manufactured by Illumina

Illumina methylation arrays are high-throughput platforms designed for the analysis of DNA methylation patterns across the human genome. These arrays provide a comprehensive and efficient way to interrogate the DNA methylation status of thousands of CpG sites simultaneously.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using methylation arrays

1

Pediatric T-ALL Methylation Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diagnostic bone marrow samples from 43 pediatric T-ALL patients collected at the University Hospital in Umeå, Sweden, have been previously analyzed by the HumMeth27K (n = 43) and HumMeth450K (n = 10) Illumina methylation arrays (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and classified regarding CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) status [25] (link). Methylation array data from the HumMeth27K array was downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, GSE42079, and data from the HumMeth450K array has been deposited to the GEO database, GSE56070. The Regional Ethics Committee approved the study, and the patients and/or their guardians provided informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Copy-Number Variations in Genomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CNVs were analyzed with Illumina methylation arrays using the conumee Bioconductor package in R using default settings. DNA copy-number segmentations were retrieved from uploading raw IDAT files to www.molecularneuropathology.org. Segmentation files were then imported to IGV (version 2.4.14) for visualization and identification of CNVs. Focal copy-number alterations were defined as regions that span a small proportion (≤25%) of the chromosome arm, whereas other regions were defined as broad alterations. Mean segment value of −0.2 and 0.2 were used as thresholds for losses and gains, respectively. Copy-number plots were manually examined for selected copy-number alterations. When copy-number information was also available from sequencing data, both results were compared and adjudicated. Adjudicated results are shown in Fig. 4 for selected recurrent somatic alterations. q values for focal, broad copy-number alterations were determined using GISTIC (v2.0.23). GISTIC analysis was performed with the following parameters: 0.9 confidence level, 0.2 amplification and deletion thresholds, 0.25 focal length cutoff, and the gene GISTIC algorithm was flagged. The broad analysis and arm peel advanced parameters were also flagged.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!