The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qpcrbio sygreen blue mix lo rox

Manufactured by PCR Biosystems
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

QPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX is a master mix designed for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) experiments. It contains a proprietary green fluorescent dye for the detection of double-stranded DNA, and a low concentration of ROX passive reference dye.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

24 protocols using qpcrbio sygreen blue mix lo rox

1

Gene Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded at a density of 8 × 105 cells/well in a 6 cm diameter dish. After which, the cells were treated with indicated concentrations of Sch B, 10 µM OLT1177 (Cat#: M9376; Abmole Bioscience Inc., Houston, TX, USA), or 10 ng/mL IL-1β (Cat#: A42509, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 24 h. Total RNA of the cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA (5 μg) was used for reverse transcription with RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas International Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada). The qRT-PCR reaction was performed by 2× qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems, London, UK) using the Roche LightCycler 480 system. Amplification and detection were performed as follows: 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for 15 s. The oligonucleotide primers used are shown in Table S1. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method, and gene expression levels were normalized to β-actin control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cells and tissues was isolated using a DNA/RNA/Protein kit (Geneaid, New Taipei, Taiwan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was prepared with a MMLV reverse transcription kit (Protech, Taipei, Taiwan). qRT-PCR was conducted using the 2 × qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems, London, UK) and a QuantStudio™ 6 Pro Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster, CA, USA). The gene-specific primer sequences are listed in Addition file 2: Table S1. The following formula was used to determine relative gene expression: ΔΔCt; where Ct indicates the threshold cycle. Relative mRNA expression levels were normalized to the β-actin reference gene [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis, and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cell RNA was extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit and QIAshredder (QIAGEN) and synthesized into cDNA through the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen); mRNA level was determined by 2× qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCRBiosystems, Wayne, PA, USA), and relative value was calculated after normalization against GAPDH. Gene-specific primers are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a qPCRBIO cDNA synthesis kit (#PB30.11, PCR Biosystems Inc.; London, UK). qRT-PCR reactions were then performed using 2× qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems Inc.) as per the manufacturer’s protocol and run on Quantstudio5 Real-time PCR log (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Massachusetts, USA). Specific primer sequences used in this study are listed in S1 Table. Each test was repeated three times, independently.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Real-Time PCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time PCR was conducted using qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems Ltd., London, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR reaction was performed using a real-time CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions for 44 cycles: 10 s denaturation time at 95 °C, 10 s annealing time at 58 °C, and 60 s extension time at 72 °C. The expression of the atrogin-1, MuRF1, myogenin, myostatin, FNDC5, BDNF, TGF-β, and IL-6 genes was normalized to GAPDH and is expressed as the fold increase. The sequences of the primers used in this study are given in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Absolute Quantification of Bacterial and Fungal Abundance in Soil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The copy number of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes in rehydrated aliquots was measured in 20 µL reactions, consisting of 0.8 µL of each of the primers 341F (5′-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′), 10 µL of 2 × qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems Inc., Wayne, PA, USA), 2 µL of sample (diluted 10 times to avoid inhibition of PCR) and 6.4 µL of H2O. The PCR mixes were heated to 95 °C for 180 s, and then subjected to 45 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and a final melt at 60 °C for 30 s on a LightCycler® 96 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Life Science, Hvidovre, Denmark). Fungal ITS2 copy numbers were measured in the same way, but with 0.8 µL of each of the primers ITS4 (5′-TTCCTSCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) and ITS7 (5′-GTGARTCATCGARTCTTTG-3′) in 20 µL reactions. The measurements from one sample, for which the copy numbers of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes and fungal ITS2 regions were 2–3 orders of magnitude lower than the other 47 samples, were deleted from the dataset. Copy numbers were expressed per g dry weight (dwt) soil (105 °C for 18 h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying CHIKV Replication in C6/36 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C6/36 cells were infected with CHIKV (MOI 2) and treated with inhibitory compounds as described above. At 24 hpi, total RNA was extracted from cells using TRI Reagent Solution (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was confirmed by denaturing ageraose gel electrophoresis before reverse transcription of 1 μg of RNA using the High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative PCR was performed using the qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems) with primers amplifying a 78 bp region of the CHIKV nsP1 encoding sequence (fwd primer: 5’CCGACTCAACCATCCTGGAT’3, rev primer: 5’GGCAGACGCAGTGGTACTTCCT’3), 100ng of cDNA template and a PCR program as described above. In vitro transcribed CHIKV ICRES RNA was reverse transcribed and a cDNA dilution series employed as a standard to quantify copy numbers in the respective samples. All experiments were performed in three independent repeats, each consisting of 2 wells/condition. A one-way ANOVA was employed and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was performed, comparing each sample to the untreated control sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Real-Time qPCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNAse-treated RNA was used to generate cDNA via the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad) per manufacturer’s instructions. Three technical replicate reactions for each condition were prepared by combining 2 μL cDNA (approximately 10 ng of RNA template), 0.8 μL of each 10 μM primer stock, 6.4 μL water, and 10 μL qPCRBio SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-Rox (PCR Biosystems). Primer sequences are provided in Supplemental Table 4. Reactions were initiated on a BioRad CFX-Connect Real Time system with the default CFX RT-qPCR protocol. For analysis, rpoA was chosen as the reference gene for normalization between samples as it exhibited low variation between strains. Data were analyzed according to the Relative Quantification (RQ) method by Pfaffl (Pfaffl, 2001 (link)), in which the wild-type strain was considered the “Control” and the nickel transport mutants were considered the “Samples” in the following equation:
Relative Quantification ratio =(Etarget)ΔCPtarget(controlsample)(Ereference)ΔCPrefernce(controlsample)
In this equation, E refers to the primer efficiency of the target gene (Etarget) or the reference gene (Ereference), and CP refers to the Cycle Point, or the cycle number at which the signal exceeds the threshold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying CHIKV RNA by Strand-Specific qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Huh7 cells were infected with CHIKV and treated with inhibitory compounds as described above. At 6 hpi, total RNA was extracted from cells using TRI Reagent Solution (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Strand-specific qPCR (ssqPCR) was performed according to the protocol described by Plaskon and colleagues [26 (link)]. Briefly, 500 ng of RNA were reverse-transcribed with gene specific primers (S1 Table) using the SCRIPT cDNA Synthesis Kit (Jena Bioscience) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 100ng of strand-specific cDNA was used as template for the quantitative PCR performed with the qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems) with gene specific primers (S1 Table) amplifying a 94 bp region of the CHIKV nsP1 encoding sequence using the following PCR program: 95°C for 2 mins, 40 x (95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 30 sec), dissociation curve 60°C-95°C as pre-defined by the Mx3005P thermal cycler (Agilent technologies). In vitro transcribed CHIKV ICRES RNA was reverse transcribed and a cDNA dilution series employed as a standard to quantify copy numbers in the respective samples. All experiments were performed in four independent repeats, each consisting of 2 wells/condition. A one-way ANOVA was employed and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was performed comparing each sample to the untreated control sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Muscle Atrophy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the calf muscle or C2C12 cells using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using a cDNA synthesis kit. Real-time PCR was conducted using the qPCRBIO SyGreen Blue Mix Lo-ROX (PCR Biosystems Ltd., London, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR reaction was performed using a real-time C1000 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) under the following conditions: 10 s denaturation time at 95 °C, 10 s annealing time at 58 °C, and 60 s extension time at 72 °C, for 39 cycles. The gene expression of atrogin-1, MuRF1, FoxO1, and FoxO3a was normalized to GAPDH and expressed as fold increase (normal level was set as 1). The sequences of the primers used in this study are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!