The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sybr green detection

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

SYBR Green is a fluorescent dye used for the detection and quantification of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in various laboratory techniques, such as real-time PCR and gel electrophoresis. The dye binds to the minor groove of dsDNA, emitting a fluorescent signal that is proportional to the amount of dsDNA present in the sample. SYBR Green can be used to monitor the amplification of DNA sequences in real-time PCR assays, providing a reliable and sensitive method for nucleic acid quantification.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

54 protocols using sybr green detection

1

Total RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent. One microgram of total RNA was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA using the Evo M-MLV system (Accurate Biotechnology; #ag11705). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed based on SYBR Green detection (ABI) in a Bio-Rad CFX Connect system. The sequences of the primers used for RT-PCR are provided in the Supplementary File.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RNA-seq Analysis and Differential Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA-seq analysis was carried out as previously described 34 (link). All RNA-seq datasets were deposited into SRA database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SRA/) under the accession code SRP159301. Briefly, cultured cells were collected, and total RNA was prepared using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN). RNA-seq libraries were constructed using SMARTer cDNA library construction kit (Clontech, Takara Bio, CA, USA) and sequenced on the BGISEQ-500 (BGI, Beijing, China). Significant expression of a transcript was considered if RPKM ≥ 1 in either one of the two conditions. Differentially expressed genes were identified with DEseq2, with a cutoff at a p-value < 0.05 and | log2 fold change ISL1 KD mutant vs ctrl | ≥ 0.5. GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) and GO enrichment analysis were performed with GSEA software and DAVID Functional Annotation Tools, respectively.
RNAs were reverse-transcribed with SuperScript II First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, ThermoFisher, MA, USA). qPCR analyses were performed using SYBR green detection (ABI, ThermoFisher, MA, USA) with primers listed in Table S7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Molecular research center, Inc.) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was verified using RNA chip (Agilent bioanalyzer). 1 µg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA (20 µl reaction) (Biorad’s Iscript select cDNA synthesis kit) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNA was diluted 1:10 and used for QPCR with SYBR green detection (Invitrogen). Phusion HF reaction buffer, phusion HF DNA polymerase and dNTPs used for QPCR were purchased from New England Biolabs. Biorad CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system was used. Biorad CFX manger software was used to calculate fold changes in gene expression. All primers sequences were listed in supplementary methods. All NMG are defined in supplementary table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of APOE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA from whole CNS and spleen was homogenized in trizol (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) and isolated following the manufacturer’s instructions. Precipitated RNA was resuspended in THE RNA Storage solution (Invitrogen) and treated with rDNAse I (Invitrogen). Complementary DNA was generated with the high capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit using the random hexamer primer protocol (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed on an ABI PRISM 7000 System (Applied Biosystems; Foster City, CA) using SYBR® Green detection (Invitrogen). Primers for APOE (5’ CGCAGG TAATCCCAGAAGC 3’) and (5’CTGACAGGATGCCTAGCCG 3’) along with 18s rRNA (5’ TTCGGAACTGAGGCCATGATT 3’) and (5’ TTTCGCTCTGGTCCGTCTTG 3’) were obtained from IDT (Coralville, IA). The relative quantitation (RQ) value was calculated using the ΔΔCt method with 18s as the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Isolation, cDNA Synthesis, and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Molecular research center, Inc.) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was verified using RNA chip (Agilent bioanalyzer). 1 µg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA (20 µl reaction) (Biorad’s Iscript select cDNA synthesis kit) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNA was diluted 1:10 and used for QPCR with SYBR green detection (Invitrogen). Phusion HF reaction buffer, phusion HF DNA polymerase and dNTPs used for QPCR were purchased from New England Biolabs. Biorad CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system was used. Biorad CFX manger software was used to calculate fold changes in gene expression. All primers sequences were listed in supplementary methods. All NMG are defined in supplementary table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Nucleotide Metabolism Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinatti, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA integrity was verified using an RNA chip (Agilent bioanalyzer, Santa Clara, CA, USA). One microgram of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA (20 µL reaction) (Bio-Rad’s Iscript select cDNA synthesis kit) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cDNA was diluted 1:10 and used for qRT-PCR with SYBR green detection (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Phusion HF reaction buffer, Phusion HF DNA polymerase, and dNTPs used for qRT-PCR were purchased from New England Biolabs. Bio-Rad CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system was also used. Biorad CFX manager software was used to calculate fold changes in the gene expression. HPRT housekeeping gene was used as an internal reference for normalisation. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S3. All nucleotide metabolism genes (NMGs) are defined in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using Qiagen RNeasy Plus Mini Kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized using Superscript II (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. SYBR Green detection (Applied Biosystems) was used for real-time PCR and was performed and analysed using ViiA7 Real Time PCR System (Life Technologies) and software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying mtDNA Copy Number in Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number of each embryo were quantified by relative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as previously described (Fragouli et al., 2017 (link)) to normalize data within samples. We used SYBR Green detection (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, United States) on a 7900-HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, United States) (Figure 1A) with modified manufacturer’s protocol. The real-time PCR was performed in duplicates because of little amount DNA samples. The mean value was obtained. When the dissociation curve was inappropriate, the corresponding well data was not included in the study. We evaluated the β2-microgrobulin gene (B2M) on nuclear genome as an endogenous standard, and the tRNA of leucine gene on mtDNA (MT-TL1), and calculated the difference of the Ct value (∆Ct). Then we supposed that 100 cells were included in 1 blastocyst and calculated the mtDNA copy number included in each embryo by 100 × 2−ΔΔCT+1. Based on previous report (Hashimoto et al., 2017 (link)), we excluded data that resulted in measurements of more than 1 × 106 copies per embryo as measurement errors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Cardiac and Renal Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extracted from frozen LV non‐infarct tissue and kidney tissue (RNAqueous® Kit, Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) was reverse transcribed to cDNA. Triplicate cDNA aliquots were amplified using sequence‐specific primers (Geneworks, Adelaide, SA, Australia) with SYBR Green detection (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using an ABI prism 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Messenger RNA expression was quantified for transforming growth factor (TGF) β1, connective tissue growth factor (cTGF), collagen I, collagen IV, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), β‐myosin heavy chain (β‐MHC) and IL‐6. Quantitation was standardized to the housekeeping genes GAPDH (cardiac tissue) and 18S (renal tissue). The primer pair sequences are as previously described 12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ChIP-qPCR Assay for PAX3 Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the manufacturer’s instructions, the ChIP assay was performed by the EZ-CHIP™ chromatin immunoprecipitation kit (Merck Millipore). Briefly, BGSCs and differentiated glioma cells were lysed, and anti-PAX3 polyclonal antibodies (sc-34918, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used in the chromatin immunoprecipitation. In ChIP-qPCR assay, primers of the p53 promoter were as follows (5′-3′): ATGTTAGTATCTACGGCACCAG (forward) and CAGCCCGAACGCAAAGTG (reverse). By ABI 7500 with SYBR Green detection (Applied Biosystems), qRT-PCR was carried out according to the standard protocol. To account for chromatin sample preparation differences (ΔCpNormalized ChIP), input DNA (non-IP enriched) values were used to normalize each ChIP DNA fraction’s Cp (crossing point) value inputting DNA fraction Cp value. Based on the normalized IgG only IP fraction Cp value ΔΔCp = (ΔCpNormalized ChIP − (ΔCpNormalized IgG)), the normalized ChIP fraction Cp values were adjusted. Above the sample specific background, the ChIP assay site fold enrichment was then calculated as 2(−ΔΔCp) (Brooks et al., 2016 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!