The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultima 4 diffractometer

Manufactured by Rigaku
Sourced in Japan

The Ultima IV diffractometer is a high-performance X-ray diffraction (XRD) instrument designed for materials analysis. It is capable of performing a wide range of XRD measurements, including phase identification, lattice parameter determination, and quantitative analysis. The Ultima IV features a compact and stable design, as well as advanced data collection and analysis software to provide accurate and reliable results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

92 protocols using ultima 4 diffractometer

1

Powder X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction of the sample, was evaluated by Ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia) over the 3–60° 2θ range at a scan speed of 0.5 deg./min. The tube anode was Cu with Ka = 0.1540562 nm monochromatized with a graphite crystal. The pattern was collected at 40 kV of tube voltage and 40 mA of tube current in step scan mode (step size 0.02°, counting time 1 s per step).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Rice Cell Wall Crystallinity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WAXD analyses were performed on rice CWR powder samples using a Rigaku Ultima-IV diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with nickel-filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) generated at 40 kV and 40 mA. The diffraction intensity profiles of CWR samples placed on a copper sample folder were measured at 20 °C in the 2θ range of 5 to 30° with a step size of 0.1° and a scan speed of 15 s per step. The apparent cell wall crystallinity index (CrI) was determined by the height of the 200 peak (I200, 2θ = ca. 22°) and the minimum between the 200 and 100 peaks (Iam, 2θ = ca. 18°) using the following equation: CrI(%)=(I200Iam)I200×100 where I200 is the height of the 200 peak (2θ = ca. 22°) and Iam is the minimum between the 200 and 100 peaks (2θ = ca. 18°)65 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Zeolite Heavy Metal Transformation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before performing the analysis all specimens of the initial zeolite and zeolites obtained after saturating with heavy metal ions were first dried in the air, then abraded in an agate mortar and after that dried at 65–70 С during 8 h. Diffractograms were registered to assess mineralogical and structural changes.
The X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) was performed on Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer (Japan) (Cu Kα). The X-ray generator operated at a power of 40 kW and 30 mA, the scanning speed was 1.0°/min, with a pitch of 0.02°, in an angular range of 3–50° (2 theta). The obtained diffractograms were analyzed in accordance with the Rietveld method [5] using PDXL software operating on a personal computer. The crystal phases were identified using the ICDD data base – International Center of Diffraction Data for Inorganic Substances.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-Ray Diffraction Protocol for Material Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was performed with a Rigaku Ultima IV Diffractometer (CuKα source with λ = 1.54184 Å) with a scintillation counter and diffracted beam monochromator, using a scanning range (2θ) of 10°–90° with a 0.02° step size at a scan rate of 0.5°/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural Analysis of Metal Prussian Blue Analogues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemical formulas of the samples were determined by elemental analyses. The ratios of the metals (Cs, K, Mn, and Fe) were obtained by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy using Agilent 7700. The amounts of C, H, and N contained in the samples were determined by standard microanalytical methods. The chemical formula, KIaCsIbMnII[FeII(CN)6]c[FeIII(CN)6]d·zH2O, was determined considering charge neutrality. Because the valences of KI, CsI, MnII, [FeII(CN)6], and [FeIII(CN)6] are +1, +1, +2, −4, and −3, respectively, a + b + 2 − 4c − 3d = 0 should be satisfied. For the far-infrared measurements, a JASCO 6100 spectrometer was used. XRD measurements were performed with a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer with a Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The PDXL program of Rigaku was used for Rietveld analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermal and Structural Analysis of TMZ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DSC, TGA, and PXRD analyses were carried out for the evaluation of the pure TMZ and equilibrated TMZ samples acquired from the bottom phase of the solubility sample in water [17 (link),18 (link)]. DSC and TGA characterization of TMZ and its equilibrated sample from water were evaluated using the “DSC 8000 (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA)” and “Pyris 1 TGA analyser (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA)” respectively, in the temperature range from 323.2 K to 573.2 K. PXRD analysis was performed using the “Ultima IV Diffractometer (Rigaku Inc. Tokyo, Japan)”, and both TMZ and its equilibrated sample were analyzed from the 3° to 80° 2-theta range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

XRD Characterization of GA Powder

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD evaluation of GA powder was performed for crystal size and phase detection using Ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) over 3–140° 2θ range at 2.0 deg./min scan speed. Based on the reported procedures, the crystallinity and crystallite were determined [16 (link)]. The tube anode was Cu with Ka = 0.154 nm monochromatized with a graphite crystal. The pattern was collected at tube voltage (40 kV) and tube current (40 mA) in step scan mode (step size 0.02°, counting time 1 s per step).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of QTF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction measurements of pure QTF and the optimum formula were performed using an Ultima IV Diffractometer (Rigaku Inc. Tokyo, Japan at College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, KSA). The XRD spectra were scanned in the range of 0–60° (2θ) at a rate of 10°/min speed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of NCSD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffractogram of samples were recorded at a room temperature using PXRD (Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 40 kV and 40 mA power settings. About 300 mg of NCSD was placed in a polymethyl methacrylate sample holder, and analysis was carried out in a continuous scan mode with a step size of 0.01° over 1 sec in range of 3° to 50° 2θ values. The diffraction patterns were analyzed using OriginPro version 9.1 software (OriginLab Corporation, Massachusetts, MA, USA, 2018).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal Nanobioconjugate Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the characterization of nanobioconjugates, we used X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) techniques, presented in detail in our previous reference [18 (link)].
XRD was used to determine the crystalline phases and the average size of the nanocrystallites. A Rigaku UltimaIV Diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation was used for this.
FT-IR was used for the study of ferrite formation and the determination of specific Me–O bonds (Me: metal, O: oxygen) in the magnetite structure. A Shimadzu IR Affinity-1S spectrophotometer was used in the 400–4000 cm−1 range.
The morphology of the sample, and the size and distribution of the nanoparticles was studied via HR-TEM, using a Hitachi TEM system (HT7700) with 0.2 nm resolution.
Using the Vasco Particle Size Analyzer, the average hydrodynamic diameter of the nanobioconjugates in dispersion and their distribution was determined using DLS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!