The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using nanoacquity uplc column

1

Phosphoproteome Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample preparation of the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC MS/MS) analysis was performed following the previously described protocol [44 (link)]. Briefly, immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to Dithiothreitol (DTT) reduction, Iodoacetamide (IAN)-mediated alkylation followed by trypsin digestion. The digested sample was desalted by Spin Desalting column (Thermo) and acidified with 0.5% Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), 50% acetonitrile then subjected to titanium dioxide enrichment using the Top Tips system (Glygen Corp). The resulting phosphopeptide-enriched sample, dissolved in 70% formic acid and diluted with 0.1% TFA, was then subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis using the Orbitrap Fusion Mass Spectrometer that is equipped with a Waters nanoACQUITY UPLC system. A Waters Symmetry C18 180 μm x 20 mm trap column and a 1.7 μm, 75 μm x 250 mm nanoACQUITY UPLC column was utilized for online peptide separation. The acquired data was peak picked and searched using the Mascot Distiller and the Mascot search algorithm, respectively. Manual examination of the MS/MS spectra (as shown in Fig 1B) and the corresponding assigned fragment ions were conducted to verify the identified phosphopeptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cross-Linked Peptides Analyzed by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between 2 and 10% of the collected fractions were analysed by LC–MS/MS using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters Corporation, Manchester, UK) connected online to an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro instrument (Thermo). Peptides were separated on a BEH300 C18 (75 μm × 250 mm, 1.7 μm) nanoAcquity UPLC column (Waters) using a stepwise 60 min gradient between 3 and 85% (v/v) ACN in 0.1% (v/v) FA. Data acquisition was performed using a TOP-20 strategy where survey MS scans (m/z range 375–1,600) were acquired in the Orbitrap (R=30,000) and up to 20 of the most abundant ions per full scan were fragmented by collision-induced dissociation (normalized collision energy=40, activation Q=0.250) and analysed in the LTQ Orbitrap. To focus the acquisition on larger cross-linked peptides, charge states 1, 2 and unknown were rejected. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with repeat count=1, exclusion duration=60 s, list size=500 and mass window ±15 p.p.m. Ion target values were 1,000,000 (or 500 ms maximum fill time) for full scans and 10,000 (or 50 ms maximum fill time) for MS/MS scans. All the samples were analysed in at least technical duplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proteomic Analysis of Trypsin-Digested Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The procedure has small modifications from the previous protocol 55. The purified proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in‐gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC‐MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm × 250 mm, 35 °C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μL·min−1, 99% buffer A (0.1% formic acid) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nL·min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient was from 5% buffer B to 50% buffer B at 50 min, and to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data‐dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision‐induced dissociation). The mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate non‐canonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Analysis of Model D

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A mixture of peptides was obtained from Model D by standard tryptic digestion (omitting reduction and alkylation steps). Tryptic peptides were applied to an RP-18 precolumn (Waters nanoAcquity 20 mm × 180 μm) using aqueous 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid as a mobile phase and then transferred to a HPLC RP-18 column (Waters nanoAcquity UPLC Column 250 mm × 75 μm). Chromatographic separation was performed at a flow rate of 150 nL/min using an acetonitrile gradient (0–60% in 120 min) in the presence of 0.05% formic acid. The column outlet was directly coupled to the ion source of an LTQ Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bergen) spectrometer working in the regime of data-dependent acquisition to register CID and HCD fragmentation spectra. The normalized collision energy was set to 30%. Dynamic exclusion was disabled. A blank run ensuring a lack of cross-contamination from previous samples preceded each analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Peptide Separation and Analysis by nanoUPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptides were separated with a BEH300 C18 (75 μm x 250 mm, 1.7 μm) nanoAcquity UPLC column (Waters) using a stepwise 145 min gradient from 3% to 85% (v/v) acetonitrile in 0.1% (v/v) formic acid at a flow rate of 300 nl/min. The LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro instrument was operated in data-dependent mode. Parameters for the CID-based method used one survey MS scan acquired in the orbitrap followed by up to 20 fragmentation scans (TOP20) of the most abundant ions analysed in the LTQ. Only charge states of two and higher were allowed for fragmentation. Essential MS settings were: full MS: AGC = 106, maximum ion time = 500 ms, m/z range = 375–1600, resolution = 30 000 FWHM; MS2: AGC = 30 000, maximum ion time = 50 ms, minimum signal threshold = 1500, dynamic exclusion time = 30 s, isolation width = 2 Da, normalized collision energy = 40, activation Q = 0.25.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Purified Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified proteins were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in-gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm x 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm x 250 mm, 35°C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μl min−1, 99% buffer A (water with formic acid (0.1%)) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nl min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient was from 5% buffer B to 50% B at 50 min, to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data-dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision induced dissociation, CID). The Mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate noncanonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

High-throughput Peptide Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 10 fractions obtained by high pH fractionation were analyzed using a nanoAcquity UPLC system (Waters GmbH) connected online to a LTQ-Orbitrap Velos Pro instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH). Peptides were separated on a BEH300 C18 (75 μm × 250 mm, 1.7 μm) nanoAcquity UPLC column (Waters GmbH) using a stepwise 145 min gradient between 3% and 85% (vol/vol) ACN in 0.1% (vol/vol) FA. Data acquisition was performed using a TOP-20 strategy where survey MS scans (m/z range 375–1,600) were acquired in the Orbitrap (R = 30,000 FWHM) and up to 20 of the most abundant ions per full scan were fragmented by collision-induced dissociation (normalized collision energy = 35, activation Q = 0.250) and analyzed in the LTQ. Ion target values were 1 × 106 (or 500 ms maximum fill time) for full scans and 1 × 105 (or 50 ms maximum fill time) for MS/MS scans. Charge states 1 and unknown were rejected. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with repeat count = 1, exclusion duration = 60 s, list size = 500 and mass window ±15 ppm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proteomic Analysis of Protein PTMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein posttranslational modifications (acetylation, oxidation, methylation, and decarboxylation) were determined by liquid chromatography (LC)-MS/MS analysis. The purified HspQ protein was separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were detected by Coomassie blue staining (Invitrogen). The band corresponding to HspQ was excised from the gel and digested with trypsin. Protein samples were desalted and applied in a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL connected to a Waters nanoACQUITY ultrahigh-performance LC (UPLC) system and equipped with a Waters Symmetry C18 180 µm × 20 mm trap column and a 1.7-µm 75 µm × 250 mm nanoAcquity UPLC column at 35°C. Detection of posttranslational modifications and peptide identification were carried out using the Mascot search algorithm (Matrix Science, version 2.4.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Trypsin Digestion and LC-MS/MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proteins were trypsin digested by a standard in-gel digestion protocol, and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on an LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Scientific) equipped with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters). A Symmetry C18 trap column (180 μm × 20 mm; Waters) and a nanoACQUITY UPLC column (1.7 μm, 100 μm × 250 mm, 35°C) were used for peptide separation. Trapping was done at 15 μL min−1, 99% buffer A (water with 0.1% formic acid) for 1 min. Peptide separation was performed at 300 nL min−1 with buffer A and buffer B (CH3CN containing 0.1% formic acid). The linear gradient (51 min) was from 5% buffer B to 50% B at 50 min, to 85% B at 51 min. MS data were acquired in the Orbitrap with one microscan, and a maximum inject time of 900 ms followed by data-dependent MS/MS acquisitions in the ion trap (through collision induced dissociation, CID). The Mascot search algorithm was used to search for the appropriate noncanonical substitution (Matrix Science, Boston, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MARCH1 Regulation of INSR Ubiquitination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were transfected with empty vector, MARCH1-Myc, or MARCH1ΔRING-Myc along with INSR-GFP and HA-Ubiquitin. Twenty-hour after transfection, cells were serum starved overnight. MG132 was added 4 h before lysis in Co-IP Buffer (Pierce). INSR-GFP was immunoprecipitated using anti-GFP antibody and eluted in 200 μl 0.2 M glycine, pH 2.5. The eluate was partially dried to ∼100 μl and precipitated with MeOH:CHCl3:Water (4:1:3 ratio). The pellet was dried and reconstituted in 8 M urea, 0.4 M ammonium bicarbonate, reduced with DTT, and alkylated with iodoacetamide in the dark. The sample was then trypsin-digested overnight at 37 °C. The digested sample was injected onto a Q-Exactive Plus (Thermo Fisher) liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry system equipped with a Waters Symmetry C18 180 μm × 20 mm trap column and a 1.7 μm, 75 μm × 250 mm nanoACQUITY UPLC column (37 °C) for peptide separation. Trapping was performed at 5 μl min−1, 99% Buffer A (100% water, 0.1% formic acid) for 3 min. Peptide separation was performed with a linear gradient over 140 min at a flow rate of 300 nl min−1. Collected data were processed using MASCOT Distiller and Search Engine (v.2.4), and modification sites were manually verified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!