The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Transmission electron microscopy

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a laboratory instrument that uses a beam of electrons to examine and analyze the internal structure and composition of materials at the nanoscale level. It provides high-resolution imaging and analysis capabilities by transmitting a beam of electrons through a thin specimen, allowing for the visualization and characterization of the sample's microstructure and chemical composition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

108 protocols using transmission electron microscopy

1

Exosome Isolation and Characterization from Amniotic Fluid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFs were cultured with the exosome-depleted medium containing 0.9 mM inorganic phosphorus or 3.5 mM inorganic phosphorus for 48 h, and then the cell supernatant was collected. Exosomes from AFs supernatant were isolated by differential centrifugation. Briefly, the supernatant was centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min, 2000 g for 10 min, 10,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C, and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g for 70 min to sediment the pellets. The pellets were then re-suspended in PBS and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g for 70 min at 4 °C. The exosomes-enriched pellet was re-suspended in the appropriate volume of PBS and filtered through 0.22 μm filters (SLGPR33RB, Millipore, USA) to obtain the sterile exosome suspension. Aliquot 5 µL of exosome suspension and the protein quantification of exosomes was measured by the BCA kit (CW0014S, cwbiotech, Beijing, China).
For the identification of exosomes, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the morphology and size of exosomes. The diameter size distribution of exosomes was analyzed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) with a Zetasizer Nano ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments). Western blot was used to detect the expression of exosomal marker proteins TSG101, CD9, and CD81.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exosome Isolation and Characterization from TGF-β1-Stimulated hUMSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hUMSCs were transfected with shUCA1 or NC for 48 h and treated with TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. The exosomes isolated from TGF-β1-stimulated hUMSCs that transfected with shUCA1 or NC were short as TGF-β1-exo shUCA1 and TGF-β1-exo shNC, respectively. Cell culture medium were collected, and exosomes were extracted using ultracentrifugation following the standard procedure. In brief, the cell medium was sequentially centrifuged at 2000 g and 4 °C for 20 min to remove dead cells and were further centrifuged at 10,000 g and 4 °C for 30 min to discard debris. The supernatants were then transferred to another clean ultra-tube and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g and 4 °C for 70 min. After discarding the supernatants, the deposited exosomes were resuspended in PBS and ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g and 4 °C for another 70 min. Extracted exosomes were resuspended in PBS and stored at −80 °C. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Hitachi, Japan) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; Malvin, Germany) were performed to measure the morphology and particle size of exosomes. The expression of exosome biomarkers, including the CD9, CD81, CD63, and TSG101, was detected by western blotting assay. For in vitro study, the exosomes were administrated at 10 μg/mL for 24 h [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles by Western Blot and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Western blot analysis (WB), MSC proteins and exosomes were added to 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PVDF membranes, Millipore), followed by blocking in 5% skim milk for 2 h at RT. Next, the membrane was incubated with diluted primary antibodies (anti-CD9 (BD Biosciences), anti-CD63 (BD Biosciences), anti-TSG101 (BD Biosciences), and anti-calnexin (BD Biosciences)) at 4°C on a shaker overnight. After three washes with Tris-buffered saline/Tween (TBST), the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Proteintech) at RT on a shaker for 2 h. Finally, the membranes were analyzed via the ChemiDoc™ XRS system (Bio-Rad).27 (link)Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi, Japan) was used to observe the morphology of the exosomes and take images. Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) was performed by electrophoresis and Brownian motion video analysis laser scattering microscopy (Particlemetrix) to analyze the particle size, concentration and distribution, and the results were analyzed with ZetaView (ZetaView 8.04.02 software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of BMSC-Derived Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMSCs in passage 3 with 80% confluence were selected for exosome extraction. BMSCs-derived exosomes were extracted by ultra-highspeed centrifugation [18 (link)]. In brief, the culture medium of BMSCs was successfully centrifuged at 300g for 10 min, 2000g for 10 min, and 10,000g for 35 min, and the supernatant was collected each time. Then the supernatant was filtered by using a 0.22 μm filter membrane (Merck Millipore, Tullagreen, Ireland), followed by ultracentrifugation and centrifugation both 100,000g for 2 h, respectively. Finally, the exacted exosomes were collected, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and stored at −80°C. The protein quality of exosomes was determined by the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). The levels of exosomal surface marker proteins including CD9, CD63, CD81, and TSG101 were detected by Western blot assay. The exosome morphology was identified by using Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), and the particle size of the extracted exosomes was measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Enhancing BMSC Proliferation with Fe3O4 Nanoparticles and SMF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The proliferation of BMSCs in response to Fe3O4 nanoparticles and SMF was measured by the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8; Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, 5×103 cells/well (four replicates per group) were seeded into 96-well plates and then treated with different concentrations of Fe3O4 nanoparticles (400, 200, 100, 50 and 25 µg/mL). A group without nanoparticles served as the control. After culturing for 1, 3, and 5 days, CCK-8 solution (10 μL) and 90 μL of culture medium were added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The absorbance was observed at 450 nm by using a microplate reader (Varioskan Flash, Thermo Scientific™, USA), and the optical density was recorded for cell viability. Then, we cultured the BMSCs at the optimal concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles combined with different SMF strengths (50, 100, 150 mT), to measure cell viability as above.
The nanoscale morphology of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles taken up by BMSCs was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). According to the results of cell viability, we selected the best synergistic magnetic environment (concentration of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and strength of SMF) to stimulate the secretion of mag-BMSC-Exos.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Co-loaded Hybrid Micelles for Nanovaccine Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BLZ-954/NLG-919 co-loaded hybrid micelles (HM) were prepared using chloroform containing mixture polymer (PEG5k-hyd-PCL3k, 25 mg; PEI3k-PCL3k, 12.5 mg) and BLZ-945 (0.2 mg, dissolved in DMSO) and NLG-919 (3 mg, dissolved in DMSO). After evaporating in a rotary evaporator at 60 °C, the dispersion was added to 70 °C deionized water and further stirred for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the micelles solution was dialyzed against deionized water for 12 h to remove organic solvent with membrane dialysis tubing (molecular weight cutoff of 3.5 kDa, Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. USA) and an ultrafiltration tube (molecular weight of 2K) was used to remove free BLZ-945/NLG-919, resulting BN@HM. Afterwards, 12.5 mg OVA was bounded with PEI through electrostatic adherence by vibrating at 4 °C for 1 h, resulting nanovaccine BN@HM-OVA. The sizes and zeta potentials of the formed BN@HM-OVA nanovaccine were measured with Zetasizer Nano ZS90 (Malvern, UK). The morphology of the nanovaccine was observed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Characterization of RAW264.7 Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RAW264.7 cells at 70% confluence were reaped and rinsed in PBS, then incubated for 48 h with 10% exosome-depleted FBS. The exosomes derived from RAW264.7 cells were named as RAW264.7 Exo. The morphology of exosomes was detected by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) from Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan) and imaged by a digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The size and number of the exosomes were analyzed employing Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) with Tunable Resistive Pulse Sensing (Christchurch, New Zealand).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterizing Extracellular Vesicle Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the morphology of nEVs and CNVs, 10 μl of samples were loaded on the 400 mesh formvar coated copper grid and allowed to incubate for 3 min at room temperature (RT). Samples were drained out with a filter paper and stained with 1% filtered uranyl acetate solution for 1 min. Prepared samples were imaged with Hitachi transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV.33 (link) The size distribution and concentration of nEVs and CNVs were detected by Nanosight NS300. Three 30-s videos were taken. Data was analyzed by the build-in algorithm of a NS300 machine and represented as mean ±SD. Classical EV protein biomarkers, including CD81, TSG101, and GAPDH, in nEVs and CNVs were analyzed with western blot. Briefly, 200 μL of nEVs or CNVs lysates were prepared by adding 50 μL of RIPA lysis buffer on ice. Samples were further mixed with 5× loading buffer and placed at 95 °C for 20 min. Gels were running at 60 V for stacking and 100 V for separating. The proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane using Bio-rad mini blotting system at 25 V for 7 min. The membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% skimmed milk dissolved in TBS. The proteins were detected by incubation with primary antibody conjugated with HRP (CD81: sc-166029, TSG101: sc-7964, GAPDH: sc-32233, Santa Cruz). The membranes were washed thrice prior to imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Exosome Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma from patients was centrifuged (4°C) at increasing speeds (2000 g for 20 min, 12,000 g for 70 min). The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane and centrifuged at 4°C and 200,000 g for 120 min (Beckman Coulter Optima L-80 XP), the supernatant was discarded, and the precipitate was retained. The precipitate was resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), filtered using a 0.22 μm filter, and stored at -80°C for further analysis. Morphology, particle size, and molecular markers (calnexin, Hsp70, Tsg101) of exosome were detected by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; ZetaViewPMX 110), and western blot analysis, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Characterization of Melanoma-Derived Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Malignant melanoma cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% exosome-depleted FBS for 48 h. Ten millilitres of cell conditioned medium or 250 μl serum (peripheral blood from patients with primary and metastatic melanoma) was mixed with ExoQuick exosome precipitation solution (System Biosciences, USA). Exosome isolation was conducted using ExoQuick-TC™ (System Biosciences, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For transmission electron microscopy, the exosomes were loaded onto carbon-coated 300 mesh copper grids (Agar Scientific Ltd., Stansted, UK), fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium tetroxide, and then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The exosomes were observed by Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitachi, Japan) after air-drying. For RNA extraction from the exosomes, a miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) was used. The concentration of exosomes protein was determined by using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime, China). A PKH67 Green Fluorescent Cell Linker Mini Kit (Sigma, USA) was used to label the purified exosomes according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were acquired with a confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!