The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using prostar hplc

1

Synthesis and Characterization of Sobetirome Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H and 13C NMR were taken on a Bruker 400 MHz. All spectra were calibrated to the NMR solvent reference peak (chloroform-d or d3-MeCN). 1H coupling constants (JHH, Hz) are reported as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (br = broad, s = singlet, d = doublet, sept= septet, m = multiplet, dd = doublet of doublets), coupling constant, and integration. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) with electrospray ionization was performed by the Bioanalytical MS Facility at Portland State University. Sobetirome and d6-sobetirome were synthesized as previously described.40 (link), 41 (link) All other reagents were purchased from Fisher, Sigma, or TCI and used as received. Analytical HPLC analysis was performed on a Varian ProStar HPLC with a Grace Altima C18, 5 μm column (4.6 × 250 mm) with a gradient (Solvent A: Water + 0.1% TFA; Solvent B: MeCN + 0.1% TFA) for B: 20–100% 0–20 minutes, 100% B 20–25min, 100%−20% B 25–26min, hold 20% B 26–30 min. Flowrate was 1 mL/min. Purity analysis of final compounds was determined to be >95% by HPLC (A235nm). HPLC traces can be found in the Supplemental Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PPJE samples were subjected to HPLC analysis using a Varian Prostar HPLC equipped with a C 18 reverse phase column (Varian, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, particle size 5 µm), a ternary pump (model Prostar 230), and a Prostar 330 diode array detector with gradient elution. Phenolic compounds in the sample were quantified using standard curves of standard solutions injected into the HPLC. The flow rate was 1 mL min−1, and the injection volume was 20 µL at 30 °C. The identifications were performed at 290 nm for phenolic acids and at 365 nm for flavonoids based on the comparison with the retention times of standards and by co-injection. The quantification of these compounds was carried out by comparing the areas of the peaks with an internal standard (resorcinol). The result was expressed as µg of phenols g−1 of dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC Quantification of Paclitaxel Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paclitaxel loading of the PTX-eNPs was measured by HPLC. A 50 uL aliquot of PTX-eNPs was diluted in 950 uL of acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The dilution was vortexed for 60 s and filtered with a 0.22 um syringe tip filter prior to analysis via HPLC. HPLC detection of PTX was performed using a 20 min linear gradient from 60:40 to 35:65 water/acetonitrile +0.1% TFA at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min on a Hamilton PRP-C18 5 um 250 × 2 column and Varian ProStar HPLC with detection at 254 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Analysis by HPLC and Gas Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of metabolites was performed with the Varian ProStar HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) system equipped with a refractive index detector operated at 30°C and an Aminex HPX-87H column (1,300 by 7.8 mm; particle size, 9 µm; Bio-Rad Laboratories) kept at 30°C. Slightly acidified water was used (0.005 M H2SO4) as the mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min. To remove proteins and other cell residues, samples were centrifuged at 20,238 × g for 5 min and the supernatant was filtered with Spartan 13/0.2 RC filters. Ten microliters of the supernatant was then injected into the HPLC system for analysis. Measurements of headspace gas composition were carried out on a Varian CP-4900 micro gas chromatograph with two installed channels. Channel 1 was a 10-m Mol-sieve column running at 70°C with 200 kPa argon and a backflush time of 4.2 s, while channel 2 was a 10-m PPQ column running at 90°C with 150 kPa helium and no backflush. The injector temperature for both channels was 70°C. The run time was set to 120 s, but all of the peaks of interest eluted before 100 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis and Purification of Isotopically Labeled Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All natural and uniformly labeled 13C and 15N amino acids were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Preloaded Fmoc-protected Wang resin was purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, MA). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and used without purification. Peptides were synthesized on a CEM Liberty Blue peptide synthesizer using a standard 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (FMOC) and tert-butyl protection scheme. Preloaded Fmoc-protected Wang resin was used for solid phase synthesis. Peptides were cleaved from the resin in a 10 mL solution of 95:2.5:2.5 trifluoroacetic acid: triisopropylsilane (TRIS): water mixture per 1.0 gram of peptide/resin. The resulting filtrate was added dropwise into cold tert-butyl methyl ether, followed by centrifugation and three rinses of the resulting solids with 40 mL of cold tert-butyl methyl ether. Peptides were purified using RP-HPLC (Varian ProStar HPLC, Alltima WP C4 column, 5 mL/min, eluent A: water with 0.2% TFA, eluent B: acetonitrile with 0.2% TFA), using a gradient of 15–50% B over 40 minutes. Chromatograms were generated by observing the UV absorbance at 254 nm, and the analyte was verified by mass spectrometry. The fractions were then lyophilized, resulting in the pure peptide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and Quantification of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenolic compounds were extracted using 50–100 mg of fine needle powder with 70% aqueous methanol HPLC grade as the solvent. Benzoic acid at 1 mg ml−1 was used as an internal standard. Aqueous methanol (600 μl) was added to the needle powder and incubated at 4°C on an agitation plate for 48 h. Aqueous methanol was removed (after centrifugation at 13 000 g for 10 min) and preserved (−80°C) after 6, 24 and 48 h of incubation. After 6 and 24 h of incubation, a fresh 600 μl of aqueous methanol was added to each sample to continue the extraction. Extracts obtained after 6, 24 and 48 h were pooled as a single extract. The Varian Prostar HPLC used for quantification was equipped with a UV detector 325, autosampler 420 and a solvent delivery module 240. Acetophenones were separated through a pre-column Polaris MetaGuard 4.6 mm and a column Polaris 250 mm × 4.6 mm C18-A (Agilent Technologies Inc.) both heated at 62°C. The solvent and solvent gradient were identical to those used in the enzyme assay. The column flow rate was 1.5 ml min−1. Ten microlitres of extract diluted 1:2 in solvent A was injected. Quantification was done using calibration curves for picein, piceol and pungenol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spectroscopic Characterization of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV absorption spectra were obtained using a Varian Cary 50 Bio UV−visible spectrophotometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). IR spectra were measured using a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR Spectrometer, SPECTRUM 2000 (Waltham, MA, USA). NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA) operating at 600 MHz for 1H and 150 MHz for 13C and equipped with a 3 mm cryogenically cooled probe. 1H and 13C spectra were referenced to the residual deuterated solvent peaks. HRESIMS data were acquired on an Agilent 6530 Accurate Mass Q-TOF instrument (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and on a TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). Diol SPE fractionation of the extract was performed on DIO Spe-ed SPE cartridges (Applied Separations, Allentown, PA, USA), and subsequent fractions were separated on Sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). These fractions were then separated on silica gel. Sephadex LH-20 and silica gel columns were attached to a UA-6 UV detector and Foxy 200 fraction collector (Teledyne Isco, Lincoln, NE, USA). Final purifications were performed using a Varian ProStar HPLC with the indicated gradient and column. All solvents and chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Muscle Vitamins and Carotenoids Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle concentration of vitamins and carotenoids was determined according to Serra et al. (37 (link)). Twenty microliters of each sample were analyzed using a Prostar HPLC (Varian) equipped with a UV-DAD coupled with a fluorescence detector spectra system (model FL3000, ThermoFinnigan, Whaltam, USA) and a C18 reverse phase column (ChromSep HPLC Columns SS 250 × 4.6 mm including Holder with ChromSep guard column Omnisphere 5 C18).
Two solutions were used as the mobile phase: one (A solution) composed of methanol:acetonitrile:water (10:70:20), the other (B solution) composed of methanol:ethyl acetate (70:30). The samples were injected into the column with 90% of solution A and 10% of solution B, maintaining a flow of 1 mL/min for 15 min. Then, a 50:50 ratio between solutions A and B at 1 mL/min flow was kept for 5 min. Finally, the flow rate was increased to 1.5 mL/min with 100% of solution B and maintained for 10 min before returning to the starting conditions. Carotenoids were detected by a UV-DAD detector at 450 nm, vitamin A was detected at 325 nm, while vitamin E was detected by the fluorimeter (excitation λ = 298 nm; emission λ = 340 nm). Quantification was obtained by an external calibration curve, obtained from the retinol, carotenoid and tocopherol standards at concentrations ranging from 0.045 μg/mL to 7 mg/mL. Carotenoids and vitamins were expressed as μg/kg of meat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Glucose Fermentation in Fungal Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize fermentation of glucose among the lab generated N6 first filial (F1) generation and the parental strains (FGSC 2223 and FGSC4825), fermentation was carried out in a 96-well format in deep-well plates. Biological replicates for each strain were collected from mycelial mats grown from spore suspension in high glucose liquid media (HGLM) with a 6 gauge punch and inoculated into 750μl of HGLM (2% glucose), sealed with aluminum ThermowellTM seals, and allowed to ferment for 7 days in 12:12 Light/Dark conditions at 25°C. All samples were performed in biological quadruplicate. After fermentation, 600 μL of media was recovered and cell debris was removed by sequential centrifugation at 13.2k rpm for 5 min. The recovered supernatant was aliquoted into HPLC vials for ethanol analysis by HPLC. HPLC quantitation was performed using a Varian ProStar HPLC with a Varian ProStar Autosampler and a Varian 356-LC Refractive Index Detector. An isocratic elution was used with an Agilent Hi-Plex H+ (300 mm x 7.7 mm ion-exchange column) with 5mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min at 60°C. The concentration of ethanol present was determined from a standard curve based on ethanol standards with a known concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Optimized Porphyrin Compound Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reactions involving porphyrin compounds were performed in the dark. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using aluminum-backed silica gel plates (Macherey-Nagel ALUGRAM® SIL > G/UV254), and ultraviolet light was used to detect TLC spots. Product purifications were performed using Silica Gel 60 (230–400 mesh) for column chromatography and Geduran 60 H Silica Gel (63–200 mesh) for flash column chromatography. Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on ProStar HPLC (Varian, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Analytical HPLC was done with a Pursuit 5-C18 column (2.5 µm, 4.6×150 mm; Varian) and preparative HPLC with Pursuit 5-C18 column (5 µm, 21.2×150 mm), both using a photodiode array detector (UV–visible detection; Varian) and a fluorescence detector (Varian).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!