The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using mac 1 m1 70

1

Immunohistochemistry of Cellular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 10 μm frozen sections of cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) perfused tissues as described previously [26 (link)]. Antibodies reactive for the following antigens were used in this study: rat monoclonals reactive to CD31 (MEC13.3), α5 integrin (5H10–27 (MFR5)), CD45 and Mac-1 (M1/70), all from BD Pharmingen (La Jolla, CA); mouse monoclonal to Ki67 from Vector Labs (Burlingame, CA), and rabbit polyclonals reactive to fibronectin (Sigma) and fibrinogen from Millipore (Temecula, CA). Fluoromyelin-red was obtained from Invitrogen. Secondary antibodies used included Cy3-conjugated anti-rat and anti-rabbit from Jackson Immunoresearch, (West Grove, PA) and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rat and anti-mouse from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hematopoietic Cell Profiling in Mouse Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell and lineage-positive cell profiling was perform on BM, spleen, and thymus of mice from each genotype. Antibodies (clones) used: CD3 (145-2C11) [BD: #553064], CD4 (H129.19) [BD: #553653], CD8 (53-6.7) [BD: #553033], Gr-1 (RB6-8C5) [BD: #553128], B220 (RA3-6B2) [BD: #553090], Ter119 (Ter119) [BD: #553673], Mac1 (M1/70) [BD: #553311], IL7Rα (A7R34) [eBiosceinces: #12-1271-82], cKit (2B8) [BD: #558163], Sca-1 (E13-161.7) [eBiosceinces: #17-5981-83], CD25 (7D4) [eBiosciences: 13-0252-82], CD44 (IM7) [BD: 559250], CD43 (S7) [BD: 561856], HSA (M1/69) [BD: #553262] and BP-1 (6C3) [BD: #553159], CD4 (GK1.5) [BD: #561830], CD8 (7D4) [eBiosciences: #12-0081-82], B220 (RA3-6B2) [BD: #561880].
Flow cytometric gating strategy is described in Supplementary Fig. 6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bone Marrow and Spleen Cell Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow cells were harvested from femurs and tibiae by crushing the bones with a mortar and pestle. The cell suspension was collected after filtering through 40 μ membrane filter (BD). These cells were used for surface staining after red blood cell (RBC) lysis treatment with Red Blood Cell Lysing Buffer Hybri-Max (Sigma). Spleens were crushed between two glass slides and isolated cells were used for surface staining with respective antibodies after RBC lysis. Surface staining was done with B220 (RA3-6132, BD), CD3 (145-2C11, BD), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5, BD), Mac1 (M170, BD), CD45.1 (A20, BD), and CD45.2 (104, BD). After surface staining with respective fluorescent antibodies, polychromatic flow acquisition was performed using a LSR II instrument (BD) at the University of Rochester Flow Cytometry Core. Flow data was analyzed using FlowJo software (version 10.0.7 Treestar, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation of Murine Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of whole BM cells were labeled by incubation on ice for 15 min using a cocktail of the following antibodies: PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD3ε (145-2C11; BD Biosciences), CD4 (L3T4; BD Biosciences), CD8α (53-6.7; BD Biosciences), B220 (RA3-6B2; BD Biosciences), Mac-1 (M1/70; BD Biosciences), Gr-1 (RB6-8C5; eBioscience), and Ter119 (TER-119, eBioscience); FITC-conjugated anti-mouse Sca-1 (E13-161.7; BD Biosciences); and APC-conjugated anti-mouse c-Kit (2B8; BD Biosciences). After cells were washed with PBS, they were incubated with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) at 4°C for 15 min. Lin+ cells (CD4+, CD8α+, B220+, Mac-1+, Gr-1+, Ter119+ cells) were removed by immunomagnetic selection using a MACS system (Miltenyi Biotec). These negatively selected cells were subjected to FACS using a Moflo XDP cell sorter (Beckman-Coulter) to prepare LSK cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Liver Inflammatory Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The necrotic area was assessed by analyzing at least 10 randomly selected areas per sample, with computer-assisted image analysis with MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downingtown, PA). Liver macrophages and neutrophils were detected using primary rat anti-mouse F4/80+ mAb (Mac-1, M1/70; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and Ly6G+ mAb (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA), respectively. After incubation with secondary biotinylated goat anti-rat IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA), followed by treatment with immunoperoxidase (ABC Kit, Vector), the average number of positive cells was quantified by analyzing at least 10 random high-power fields (HPF, original magnification × 400) per animal, with Image-Pro Plus software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Spleens and thymi were collected in PBS, and cells were obtained by mechanical disruption. Cell suspensions were treated with lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM NaHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were washed and resuspended in FACS buffer for flow cytometry analysis. The following Abs from BD Biosciences were used for flow cytometry: CD4-GK1.5, CD8-53-6.7, CD19-1D3, B220-RA3-6B2, Mac-1–M 1/70, and isotype control. Abs to stain various TCR Vβ regions were also obtained from BD Biosciences. Foxp3+ T cells were enumerated using an intracellular staining kit from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using CellQuest software. Mononuclear cells were gated based on forward and side scatter profiles. Subsequent gating was based on staining with the indicated Abs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Vascular and Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 10-μm frozen sections of cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS)-perfused tissues as described previously [33 (link)]. Antibodies reactive for the following antigens were used in this study: rat monoclonals reactive to CD31 (MEC13.3), β4 integrin (346-11A), MHC class II (M5/114.15.2), CD45, Mac-1 (M1/70), all from BD Pharmingen (La Jolla, CA); mouse monoclonal α-SMA-Cy3 conjugate (1A4) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO); rabbit polyclonals reactive to claudin-5 and ZO-1 from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA); and fibrinogen from Millipore (Temecula, CA). Secondary antibodies used included Cy3-conjugated anti-rat and anti-rabbit from Jackson Immunoresearch (West Grove, PA) and anti-rat Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Liver Macrophage and Neutrophil Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver macrophages and neutrophils were detected using primary rat anti-mouse CD11b+ mAb (Mac-1, M1/70; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) or Ly6G+ mAb (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA). After incubation with secondary biotinylated goat anti-rat IgG (Vector, Burlingame, CA), followed by treatment with immunoperoxidase (ABC Kit, Vector), positive cells were counted blindly in ten HPF/section (×400). For immunofluorescence, frozen liver sections were labeled with primary antibodies ATF3 and CD11b (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA), and then incubated with secondary Cy3-conjugated AffiniPure donkey anti-goat IgG antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, PA). The samples were pre-mounted with VECTASHIELD medium with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!