The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Carelink network

Manufactured by Medtronic
Sourced in United States

The CareLink Network is a secure remote monitoring system that allows healthcare providers to access and review patient data from compatible medical devices. It facilitates the collection and transmission of patient data to healthcare providers for review and management of the patient's condition.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using carelink network

1

Device-Measured Predictors of Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from the Medtronic CareLink® network from CRT‐D devices implanted in the January 2005 to April 2006 time frame were queried to determine the values of daily impedance, reference impedance, time in atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AF), night heart rate, and percent bi‐ventricular pacing on the day of discharge from an index hospitalization. To compare with prior literature, the previously defined device‐measured parameters on the day of discharge (daily intrathoracic impedance > 8 Ω below reference impedance, AF burden > 6 h, CRT pacing < 90%, and night heart rate > 80 bpm) were then applied and coded as indicator variables for use in modelling outcomes.11 Similarly, if device‐measured data were missing from the CareLink® data for a specific device parameter on the day of discharge, it was considered that that diagnostic criterion was not met (298 missing, 49.1%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RM systems included both wireless RM (WRM) and manual RM devices. WRM devices enable the automatic transmissions of daily or weekly alerts, whereas manual RM devices require that patients manually interrogate the PM/ICD with the handle of the gateway. Centers involved in the study used a similar organizational model to provide telemedicine services. Figure 1 shows the workflow for managing RM of PM/ICD patients.
The process consists of the following six steps:
All involved nurses and physicians had specific competence in cardiac electrophysiology and electro-stimulation. They were also exposed to a specific training offered by vendors’ specialists regarding the use of RM technology and portals. The training consisted of a face-to-face session lasting one hour. RM systems [17 (link)] were supplied by one of the five following Companies: (1) HM of Biotronik Gmbh, Berlin, German; (2) CareLink Network by Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA; (3) Latitude Patient Management System by Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN, USA; (4) Merlin.Net system by St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA; and (5) SmartView system by Sorin Group, Italy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cryptogenic Stroke Cardiac Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LOOK (a multicenter observational study on the detection of AF using insertabLe cardiac mOnitors in patients with cryptOgenic stroKe) registry is an observational, multicenter, prospective registry of patients who have been diagnosed with CS and implanted with an ICM. The Medtronic CareLink Network is being used to remotely transmit the device data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Measuring Patient Satisfaction with Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present research was designed as an observational, two-stage, cross-sectional, multicenter study to develop a specific instrument for the measurement of patient satisfaction with RM of CIED. Patients with implanted pacemakers (PM), ICD, and CRT devices who had been using CareLink® Network for at least 2 months before recruitment were included. The study was conducted under actual treatment conditions for their disorder in clinical practice.
The Medtronic CareLink® Network is the Internet-based remote monitoring service for patients with Medtronic implanted cardiac devices. It allows patients a convenient timely connection to their clinic using the person’s monitor/ smartphone/ tablet to collect and transmit device data. A hand-held smart reader is used to collect data from the implanted device. The smart reader communicates with the monitor and, through a software application, it transfers the data to the CareLink® Network. All the information is recorded and reviewed by the nurses through the online platform. In case there is a critical event, the patient is called by the medical staff to visit the physician (Figure 6 Additional file 3).
The study was performed following the Helsinki-Tokyo-Venice guidelines for human research.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Remote Monitoring of Implantable Heart Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The technology used in the study was the Medtronic CareLink® Network, which is an internet-based RM service for patients with Medtronic implantable heart devices. The monitor gathered information from patients at home using a standard phone line and sent it to authorised hospitals [25 ]. Currently, PM communication with the transmitter is completely automatic in some models, without the intervention of the patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Monitoring Cardiac Arrhythmias with Implantable Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The device was implanted subcutaneously under local anesthesia. All patients were monitored using a secure online database (CareLink® Network, Medtronic Inc., USA). Patients with the Reveal® XT performed transmissions at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, whereas those with the Reveal LINQ™ ade automatic daily transmissions. All patients were monitored for 12 months after device implantation regardless of findings on ICM.
The de i e as progra ed to dete t AF episodes ≥ 2 i utes a d store the ele trogra s for review. A minimum AF episode duration of 2 minutes is required by the device to detect AF with a high sensitivity [16] (link). AF was defined as irregularly irregular heart rhythm with the absence of pwaves. Other clinically relevant arrhythmias were also stored. AF detected on HM lasted at least 30 seconds [17] (link). Suspected AF and other arrhythmias were independently adjudicated by two experienced senior electrophysiologists.
(CI). Time from device implantation to event was analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier curve. Difference between time to first AF episode and time to first arrhythmia episode other than AF was calculated using the log-rank test. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Implant-Detected Atrial Fibrillation Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ICMs (Reveal LINQ; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) were implanted under local anesthesia in the left parasternal position at 45 degrees relative to the sternum above the fourth intercostal space. Devices were programmed to detect AF using the company's unique AF detection algorithm. These algorithms recognize AF by assessing the irregularity of R-R peaks in 2 min intervals. The Medtronic CareLink Network was used to transmit device data remotely. The study physician received an alert if the device detected an AF episode. Detected AF episodes were adjudicated by the study physician. The ICM monitoring data up to June 2018 were used for current analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Devices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between January 2010 and December 2012, patients with a CIED were recommended to undergo remote monitoring at the discretion of the attending cardiologists. Since January 2013, all patients who underwent CIED-related procedures were routinely recommended for the implementation of remote monitoring. In the remote monitoring systems provided by three venders (Home Monitoring™, Biotronik; Latitude Patient Management system™, Boston Scientific, and Merlin.net™, Abbott) the records were automatically transmitted to our institution once a week via home transmitters. In the system from the fourth vendor (CareLink Network™, Medtronic, Inc.), data from the patients with a pacemaker were transmitted once a month, whereas data from patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy were transmitted once a week. The data were reviewed by experienced clinical engineers and electrophysiologists once a week. When unscheduled transmissions were obtained, the data were quickly reviewed. Inquiry for patients was performed by physicians when the scheduled transmission was missed for a week.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!