The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistical package for the social sciences spss for windows version 24

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) for Windows version 24 is a software application that provides statistical analysis capabilities. It is designed for the analysis of data in the social sciences. The software offers a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, bivariate statistics, prediction for numerical outcomes, and prediction for identifying groups.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using statistical package for the social sciences spss for windows version 24

1

Oncologist Workload Across Income Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Countries were classified into LMICs, UMICs, and HICs on the basis of World Bank
criteria.8 The primary
objective was to describe oncologist workload across LMICs, UMICs, and HICs;
oncologist workload was defined as the annual number of consultations for new
patients with cancer seen per oncologist. Because of a relatively small number
of responses from low-middle–income African nations, we combined these
responses into a region called LMIC Africa. All data were initially collected in
Fluid Surveys and subsequently exported to IBM Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 24.0 (SPSS, Armonk, NY). Pearson
χ2 tests were used to test for the difference in
proportions, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare ordinal and
continuous data by income stratification. Data consisted of categorical,
ordinal, and continuous formats, occasionally collected as ranges (eg, < 50,
51 to 100, 101 to 150, etc). In the latter case, medians were generated using
the midpoint of the categorical range (eg, a median value of 101 to 150 would be
reported as 125). Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimorbidity Patterns and Health Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows version 24.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Frequencies, means and standard deviations were computed to describe the sample. Data were checked for normality distribution and outliers. Chi-square tests were used to test for differences in proportions. To identify the pattern of NCD multimorbidity, principal factor method was used with equimax rotation. Multinomial logistic regression was used by comparing NCD comorbidity and NCD multimorbidity prevalence with those not having any NCD (reference category). Linear regression was used to predict general physical and mental health, and logistic regression was used to predict psychological distress and PTSD symptoms. Probability below 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung Function and Exercise Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data. Non-normally distributed variables are shown as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Categorical variables are presented as frequency (%). A one-way ANOVA test was used to compare means between the groups and a chi-square test was used to analyze for categorical variables. The differences of non-normally distributed variable between groups are compared using Kruskal-Wallis. Independent sample T-test was used to figure out the correlation between chest radiography with lung function and 6MWD. Statistical significance is accepted at a two-sided p-value <0.050. Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, Version 24.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Descriptive Statistical Analysis of Participant Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participant data were analysed by descriptive statistics. Absolute and relative frequencies were used to describe categorical variables. The continuous ones were expressed by the mean and standard deviation (SD). Inferential tests were conducted to compare variables according to sex, age, and ID level: Student’s t-test (continuous variables) and Chi-square test (categorical variables). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. When possible, point-estimates of effect-size (odds ratio for variables with two categories and Cramér’s V for variables with more than two categories) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each inferential test were also conducted. Data analysis was performed by IBM’s Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) for Windows version 24 (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

ADHD Cognitive Profile and Self-Esteem Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for data analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni-corrected t-tests were applied to examine group differences for the major WISC-IV indices, including the VCI, PRI, WMI, PSI, and the full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ). It is of note that the potential covariate effect of age was controlled as FSIQ and indices scores are estimated by age-scaled scores and thus age was not entered a covariate in the analysis. A separate similar ANOVA was conducted on the rating of self-esteem domains. Our data met the ANOVA linear assumptions and Leven’s test was used to examine the homogeneity of variances. Additionally, we performed a discriminant analysis to explore whether WISC-IV indices scores, as predictor variables, can predict grouping of ADHD patients into ADHD-I, ADHD-H, and ADHD-C subtypes. Correlational analyses between the outcome measures were calculated using the Pearson correlation (two-tailed). A significance level of p < .05 was used for all statistical comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

COVID-19 Anxiety and Personality Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows, Version 24 (SPSS Inc., New York, USA). An analysis of descriptive statistics was conducted to illustrate the demographic and other selected characteristics of the participants. Descriptive statistics were reported as a number (%) for categorical variables and mean (and SD) for continuous variables concerning participants' backgrounds. One-way ANOVAs and independent t-tests were used in order to investigate the associations between sample socio-demographic characteristics and anxiety. Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression were conducted to examine the relationships between pathological personality traits and COVID-19-related anxiety. Data met the ANOVA and regression analysis linear assumptions. Normal distributions and homogeneity of variance were confirmed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levin's tests, respectively (p< 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Positional Group Effects Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine positional group effects. For significant main effects indicted by the one-way ANOVA, Newman-Keul post hoc tests were performed to determine the specific location of significance among the groups. Alpha (α) levels for all statistical testing were set at p ≤ 0.05 as the acceptable level of significance. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows, version 24; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!