The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dako autostainer

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Denmark, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Switzerland

The Dako Autostainer is a laboratory instrument used for automated immunohistochemical (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) staining of tissue samples. It is designed to perform a variety of staining protocols with consistent and reproducible results.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

170 protocols using dako autostainer

1

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The paraffin tissue sections were incubated at 60 °C for 1 h, then loaded onto the Dako autostainer and treated with Proteinase K for 5 min. Subsequently, the Dako autostainer applied the antibodies (PD-L1, 22C3, Dako, Santa Clara, USA), and slides were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Following a buffer wash, slides underwent a 30-min incubation with the labeled polymer, HRP, at room temperature. The DAB+ substrate-chromagen solution was then applied for 10 min. Counterstaining was carried out with Dako automation hematoxylin for 5 min, followed by post-counterstaining with a bluing agent for 1 min. After washing, slides were dehydrated in three sequential washes of 70%, 95%, and 100% reagent alcohol, and three xylenes baths before coverslips were applied. Binary scoring, utilizing the FDA-approved companion assay cut-point for PD-L1–stained tumor-infiltrating ICs (of any staining intensity, covering ≥ 1% of the tumor area), was conducted by two board-certified. Anatomic pathologists specialized in PD-L1 interpretation. In cases of discordance, a consensus-based final PD-L1 score was assigned after re-review.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Tumor Histology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor histology was evaluated through H&E staining on a Dako autostainer (Agilent). Three micrometer sections from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) HT29 tumor were incubated with the appropriate serum designed for blocking endogenous mouse IgG and non-specific background in mouse tissues (Rodent Block M; Biocare Medical), and then incubated overnight at 4ºC using primary antibodies: anti-Ki-67 (1:75, Ki-67 Antigen (Dako Omnis) Clone MIB-1); cleaved caspase-3 antibody (1:250, Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Clone #269518 anti-human cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) antibody); mouse monoclonal anti-human PD-1 (1:50 [NAT105] Abcam), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (1:400, D13.14.4E, XP Rabbit mAb #4370-CST), phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (1:400, D3F9, XP Rabbit mAb #4511-CST). Anti-PD-1, predilute, NAT105 (Cell marque) in a Benchmark XT (Ventana Medical Systems) was used for section from patients with colon cancer. The IHC staining was evaluated in at least 10 consecutive not overlapping high-power field (HPF) ×400 magnification (0.237 mm2/field) in at least five areas using an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Stained sections were independently evaluated by expert pathologist/researchers blinded to initial assessments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying EGFR and BBB Integrity in HGG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EGFR (RM-2111-RQ [Thermo Fisher Scientific]; secondary, SM805[Agilent Technologies]) immunohistochemistry and hematoxylin counterstaining were performed after heat-mediated antigen retrieval with Dako Autostainer (Agilent) along positive and negative controls. Double immunohistochemical staining of Claudin-5 (1:500, 34–1,600; Thermo Fisher) and ETS-related gene (1:1,000, EPR3864; Abcam) was performed on HGG tissue to assess blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity (2 (link)). Immunoreactivity was visualized with diaminobenzidine (for EGFR and Claudin-5) and magenta (for ETS-related gene) chromogens (Dako) and scanned in NanoZoomer 2.0-HT (Hamamatsu Photonics). The percentage of pixels with moderate to strong staining was quantified with ImageScope (Aperio Technologies) as previously described (11 (link)). EGFR-positive tumor cells within tumor outlines were counted with a MATLAB (MathWorks) algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ADAMTSL4 Expression in Human Coronary Arteries

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human coronary arteries were fixed and paraffin embedded. De-paraffinized sections were treated with target retrieval solution DAKO citrate pH 6.1 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Slides were labeled with anti-ADAMTSL4 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) on the DAKO Autostainer (Agilent, Carpinteria, CA) using ImmPRESS Rb (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA) and diaminobenzadine as the chromogen. Slides were imaged on EVOS microscope (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA).
In situ hybridization for ADAMTSL4 mRNA was performed on a normal human coronary artery sample. Five-micron sections were obtained from the fixed and paraffin-embedded human coronary artery, and slides were processed according to the RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent V2 assay manufacturer’s instructions (ACDbio, Newark, CA). The probes used were as follows: C1- Hu TAGLN, C2-Hu ADAMTSL4, C3-HU ACTA2. Opal fluorophores (520, 570, 690) were used at 1:1000 dilution (Akoya Biosciences, Marlborough, MA). Slides were imaged on Nikon Ti microscope using the Element Software (Nikon, Melville, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on routine sections. The following monoclonal antibodies were used for immunostaining: AE1/AE3 (clone AE1/3, 1:50 dilution; Dako, Carpinteria, CA), CK7 (clone OV-TL 12/30, prediluted; Dako), CK5/6 (D5/16B4 clone, prediluted; Dako), CK20 (clone Ks20.8, prediluted; Dako), synaptophysin (clone DAK-SYNAP, prediluted; Dako), chromogranin (clone LK2H10+PHE5, 1:200 dilution; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA), CD56 (clone 123C3, 1:50 dilution; Dako), TTF1 (clone SPT24, prediluted; Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL), INSM1 (clone A-8, 1:150; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), GATA3 (clone L50-823, 1:100 dilution; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA), p63 (clone DAK-p63, prediluted; Dako), p40 (clone BC-28, 1:50 dilution; Biocare, Concord, CA), and uroplakin II (clone BC-21, 1:100 dilution; Biocare). Briefly, 4-μm-thick sections were deparaffinized in xylene and hydrated in graded alcohol. Immunostaining was performed using a DAKO autostainer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Slides were incubated with the primary antibody and then with a visualization reagent (secondary goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin and horseradish peroxidase linked to a dextran polymer backbone). The slides were then rinsed with distilled water, incubated with a 3,3-diaminobenzidine substrate-chromogen solution, and subjected to Mayer hematoxylin counterstaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Brain Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain sections (4 μm thick) were incubated with primary antibodies after heat mediated antigen retrieval. All immunohistochemical procedures were performed following preprogramed standard protocol on an automatized histostainer (Dako Autostainer, Agilent) with positive and negative controls in each operation. Immunoreactivity was visualization with diaminobenzidine and magenta chromogens (Dako EnVision). A staining index was calculated as the product of intensity and fraction of positive tumor cells using Aperio ImageScope (Leica)51 . The immunoreactivity of human brain tissues were scored by two board-certified pathologists as previously described52 (link). Primary antibodies were: EGFR (prediluted, Thermo Scientific, RM-2111-RQ), Ki-67 (prediluted, Dako, GA62661-2), Claudin-5 (1:500, Thermo Scientific, 34–1600) and ERG (1:1000, Abcam, EPR3864). Secondary antibody: EnVision FLEX + rabbit (linker) (prediluted, Dako, SM805) for EGFR; no secondary antibody was used for all other antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD3 and PAX5

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry for cytoplasmic CD3 and nuclear PAX5 antigens were performed at the Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph (an American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians accredited laboratory), using an automated staining instrument (Dako Autostainer, Dako/Agilent, Ontario, Canada). The immunohistochemical reaction for CD3 followed the protocol detailed by Hall et al. (12 (link)). For PAX5, after manual deparaffinization and rehydration, the sections were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was carried out using an EDTA buffer (pH 9) and a pressure cooker device (PT Link, Dako). Primary antibodies against PAX5 (mouse monoclonal, clone 24, Biocare Medical) were diluted 1:50, and incubated at RT for 30 mins. Slides were then incubated with a dual anti-mouse / anti-rabbit anti-IgG horseradish peroxidase–linked polymer (EnVision FLEX, Dako) for 30 mins at RT, and reactions were visualized using Nova Red chromogen (Vector Laboratories, Burlington, ON, Canada). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. For CD3 and PAX5 immunohistochemical analysis, thymus, and bursa of Fabricius were used as positive controls, respectively. Negative controls were incubated in the absence of primary antibody. Sections were imaged using the same microscope and camera as described previously.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histopathological Evaluation of Lymph Nodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All dissected LNs were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 3-mm transverse sections. After deparaffinization and rehydration, 4- to 5-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and examined by one of three pathologists with high experience in urological malignancies. If conventional histology was inconclusive, immunohistochemistry with a pancytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE3) was carried out using a DAKO Autostainer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). In cases of false-negative DSNB results, SLNs were histopathologically reexamined by one pathologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Automated Immunohistochemical Staining Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed on the DAKO Autostainer (Agilent, Carpinteria, CA) using Envision+ or liquid streptavidin-biotin and diaminobenzadine (DAB) as the chromogen. De-paraffinized sections were labeled with the antibodies listed in Supplemental Table 1 for 30 minutes at ambient temperature. Microwave epitope retrieval, as specified in Supplemental Table 1, was used prior to staining for all antibodies. Appropriate negative (no primary antibody) and positive controls (as listed in Supplemental Table 1) were stained in parallel with each set of slides studied. Whole-slide digital images were generated using an Aperio AT2 scanner (Leica Biosystems Imaging, Vista, CA, USA) at 20X magnification, with a resolution of 0.5 μm per pixel. The scanner uses a 20x / 0.75 NA objective and an LED light source. The same instrument and settings were used throughout the study for all whole-slide images generated. The images were checked for quality before use, and scans were repeated as necessary. Digital slides were analyzed using the Visopharm image analysis software suite (DK-2970 Hoersholm, Denmark, v2019.2) to count stained and unstained nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of BORIS in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All human tumour specimens (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides) were obtained under an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved protocol of the Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Staining was performed by Applied Pathology Systems using the ImmPRESS Excel Amplified HRP Polymer Staining Kit (MP-7601, Vector Laboratories) on a Dako Autostainer (Agilent Technologies). Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and subjected to antigen retrieval in citrate-based buffer on a steamer for 25 min. Slides were blocked with BLOXALL blocking solution and 2.5% horse serum sequentially before a 1-h incubation with BORIS antibody at 1:50 dilution (ab187163, Abcam). Sections were then incubated with anti-rabbit amplifier antibody and ImmPRESS Excel Amplified HRP Polymer Reagent sequentially before incubation with ImmPACT DAB EqV Substrate. Finally, slides were counterstained with haematoxylin, followed by dehydration and the addition of coverslips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!