The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas statistical software package version 7

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS statistical software package version 7.1 is a comprehensive data analysis and statistical software solution. It provides a suite of tools for data management, statistical modeling, and reporting. The software is designed to handle a wide range of data types and can be used for a variety of analytical tasks, such as regression analysis, time series forecasting, and multivariate statistics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

4 protocols using sas statistical software package version 7

1

Piglet Growth and Survival Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software package version 7.1 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA). Mean values, as well as the standard deviation (SD), were calculated for all parameters. The study was based on a two-factorial (farrowing system vs. BW) trial. By means of the Shapiro-Wilks test and Kolmogorow-Smirnov test, the parameters were checked for normal distribution. In the case of normally distributed data, the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range test (REGWQ) was used for reproductive parameters (parity, number of total born/ live-born/stillborn piglets, number of piglets after litter equalisation, weaned piglets, piglet losses), IC and daily weight gain to detect significant differences between housing systems. For the availability of normally distributed data, the two-sample t-test was used to compare IC and daily weight gain between light and heavy piglets. To compare the concentrations of the AAs between housing systems and weight classes (light vs. heavy), a nonparametric test (Kruskal-Wallis-test) was used because of their non-normal distribution. This was followed by a pairwise comparison with the Wilcoxon two-sample test. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flooring Impacts on Broiler Welfare

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software package version 7.1 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA). Mean values, as well as the standard deviation of the mean (SD), were calculated for all parameters, as well as individual BW and carcass weights. The mean FPD-scores were evaluated by using the mean of both feet. The feed and water intakes, FCR, W:F-ratio, and percent DM content in litter were estimated at the pen level, as well as the final BW and FPD for correlation analysis. For the description of the prevalence of FPD, two-dimensional frequency distributions of categorical features were checked for dependency by means of the Pearson‘s chi square homogeneity test.
The group comparisons were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent samples. The Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch multiple range test (REGWQ) was used for multiple pairwise means comparisons between the four groups of flooring design. A Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the final BW and final FPD-scores at the pen level between groups. All statements of statistical significance were based on p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Campylobacter Contamination in Chicken

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using the SAS statistical software package, version 7.1 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, United States). After classification of Campylobacter contamination levels of chicken carcass neck samples and human cases, both characteristics were shown and descriptively analysed using table analyses. Pearson’s chi-square homogeneity test was used to determine if there was an association between the two parameters. Cohen’s kappa coefficient as a descriptive measure of agreement was analysed and evaluated according to Altman: values of <0.20 are poor, 0.21–0.40 fair, 0.41–0.60 moderate, 0.61–0.80 good and 0.81–1.00 very good (29 ). In addition, the McNemar test was used for differences in the marginal distributions.
The data on private consumption behavior of fresh chicken meat were analysed descriptively by mean values, minimum, maximum and standard deviation. To test for normal distribution, a Shapiro–Wilk test was performed. Data were checked for significant differences with the Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsch-test (one-way ANOVA). All statements of statistical significance were based on p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Resistance Trends in Flooring Designs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data of resistance to antibacterial agents were performed using the SAS statistical software package version 7.1 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA). MICs were summarized and reported as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R; the results were classified as 1 = S, 2 = I, or 3 = R), where CLSI veterinary breakpoints were available [28 ]. The analyses were made with these values for the categories. There are no intermediate values between classes one, two, and three. Therefore, a generally high standard deviation has to be tolerated. In the case of completely sensitive isolates at the beginning of the tests, the values are constant at one, i.e. the standard deviation is zero and can therefore not be seen graphically. Significant differences in the means of the resistance results between the four groups of flooring designs were tested using the repeated measures ANOVA (Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD)). This test was also used to determine the differences between the sampling stages and the frequency of resistance between the three trials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!