The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nis elements br analysis software

Manufactured by Nikon
Sourced in Japan

NIS-Elements BR analysis software is a comprehensive imaging platform designed for scientific and research applications. It provides a suite of tools for image acquisition, processing, analysis, and management. The software is compatible with a wide range of Nikon's microscopy systems and supports a variety of imaging techniques, including fluorescence, brightfield, and phase contrast.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using nis elements br analysis software

1

Immunohistochemistry Analysis of Kidney Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed in 4 μm formalin-fixed kidney slides. Sections were deparaffinised and endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 2% hydrogen peroxide/methanol solution. Antigen retrieval was performed according to Supplementary Table S1. Endogenous avidin and biotin were blocked. Blocking solution and primary antibody was added overnight. After the addition of the secondary biotinilated antibody and ABC, sections were developed with DAB, counterstain with Mayer’s haematoxylin and mounted. For α-SMA, Collagen III and Collagen IV image analysis was performed at 200X using Nikon Eclipse Upright microscope and NIS-Elements BR Analysis software from Nikon. At least 10 random fields of cortex were analysed per kidney. For CtsD and B, human sections were assessed by an expert histopathologist (KMW). A minimum of three different patient biopsies were stained per disease.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Chicken Monocyte Pyroptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pyroptosis was measured as described previously [28 (link)]. Briefly, monocytes were isolated from SPF chickens and infected with ALV-J. The cells were stained with PI (2 µg/ml) and Hoechst 33342 (5 µg/ml) (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) at 24 hours post infection (hpi). Dead cells (PI permeable, red) were observed under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan) using NIS-Elements BR analysis software (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Situ Hybridization for Anosmin-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The tissue samples were prepared for this experiment as described previously55 (link). Briefly, we used chick full-length anosmin-1 mRNA for the anosmin-1 RNA probe, which was labeled with digoxigenin (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The samples were incubated with the probe at 65 °C for 18 h. After washing with TTBST (Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 0.5% Triton X-100 [Wako Pure Chemical]), the samples were then incubated with anti-digoxigenin-AP antibody (Roche) in TTBST including 5% horse serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4 °C overnight. The in situ color reactions were developed in a mixture of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate p-toluidine salt and nitro blue tetrazolium chloride solutions (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) in color reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl at pH 9.5, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM MgCl2) at room temperature. Stained sections were imaged under a microscope (ECLIPSE Ti-U; Nikon, Tokyo Japan) and the images were analyzed with NIS-Elements BR Analysis software (Nikon).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Serological Evaluation of Avian Leukosis Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The two ELISA-positive samples selected from late and fast feathering chicken groups were also evaluated with Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) and Western blotting following our previously described method with ALV-J envelope protein specific monoclonal antibody JE9 (kindly provided by Dr. Kun Qian, Yangzhou University) (Venugopal et al., 1997 (link); Dai et al., 2016a (link)). IFA was performed using the FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG (Sigma, USA) and analyzed by fluorescence microscope using NIS-Elements BR analysis software (Nikon, Japan). IRDye 800-conjugated anti-mouse IgG or IRDye 700DX-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000; Rockland Immunochemicals, USA) were as the secondary antibody in western blot analysis, and analyzed with an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Astrocyte-Connexin 43 Colocalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Double‐label immunofluorescence staining and image analysis were performed as previously described.
7 (link) Sections were immersed in 5% goat serum for 1 h and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, including anti‐connexin 43 (Cx43, Abcam, ab66151, 1:200), anti‐glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, Millipore, MAB360, 1:600). Secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (SouthernBiotech, 1036–02, 1:400) and 594 (SouthernBiotech, 4030–03, 1:400) were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The brain slices were attached to coverslips and mounted with VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, USA) containing correct dilution of DAPI (SouthernBiotech, USA). All slices were viewed using a fluorescent microscopy (Nikon, Japan). Non‐overlapping regions (3 for right peri‐hippocampal cortex and bilateral Cornus Amonis area 1 (CA1); 2 for bilateral dentate gyrus (DG)) were randomly collected. All images were analyzed with NIS‐Elements BR Analysis software (Nikon, Japan). The positive expression of GFAP/Cx43 was represented with integrated optical density (IOD).
35 (link) Data acquisitions and analyses were performed in blind conditions of the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Molecular Diagnostics for Avian Leukosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from the spleens of the clinic samples using a commercial kit (Omega, USA). Specific primers were employed to differentiate between ALV-J, ALV-A/B, and other suspected viruses including Marek’s disease virus (MDV) and reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) (Lai et al., 2011 (link)). According to a previously described method (Li et al., 2013 (link)), chicken plasma was used for virus isolation by inoculation into DF1 cells. DF-1 cells are only susceptible to exogenous ALV virions (Maas et al., 2006 (link)). Infected DF1 cell culture supernatants from clinical samples were tested for ALV group-specific antigen (p27) using the ALV Antigen Test KitR (IDEXX, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. ALV-J infection was further confirmed by immunofluorescence using standard techniques (Venugopal et al., 1997 (link)). Infected cell images were collected using NIS-Elements BR analysis software (Nikon).
Liver tissue samples fixed in 10% buffered formalin were stained with hemotoxylin and eosin (HE) and examined histopathologically (Cheng et al., 2010 (link)). Immunohistochemical staining was used for further diagnoses with JE9 monoclonal antibody (kindly provided by Dr. Kun Qian, Yangzhou University). Binding of the JE9 antibody was detected using anti-mouse-HRP (Zhongshan Goldenbridge, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Avian Leukosis Virus Infection in Chickens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The clinical symptoms of 140-day-old spontaneous infection female White Recessive Rock (WRR) chickens were as follows: depression and hemorrhages in the skin of the phalanges and feather follicles. In total, 23 tumor spleen samples and 23 healthy spleen samples from chickens were collected independently. The procedures for virus isolation were performed in DF-1 cells as described previously45 (link). After the infected DF-l cells were cultured for 7 days, the supernatants of these cells were harvested and tested for ALV group-specific antigen (p27) using an antigen-capture ELISA kit (IDEXX Laboratories, USA). PCR was used to test genomic DNA from cultured DF-1 cells. Previously published specific primers (Supplementary Table S5) were synthesized and employed to detect different subgroups of exogenous ALVs46 (link) and other avian tumor viruses, including MDV47 and REV48 . ALV-J infection was further confirmed by IFA using standard techniques49 (link). The images of infected cells were collected by fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan) using NIS-Elements BR analysis software (Nikon). Finally, spleens from the two groups (ALV-J-infected group: WRR+; uninfected group: WRR) were subjected to Illumina deep sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Neonatal Mouse Lung Histology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neonate mice were immediately sacrificed after birth by neck removal. Lung tissue was perfused with PBS and fixed in 4% buffered formalin overnight, followed by dehydration, embedding, and sectioning following standard protocols. Sections (5 μm) were mounted on slides for H&E staining. Aerated lung areas and alveolar septal thickness were measured in H&E stained sections using Nikon NIS-Elements BR Analysis software. Septal thickness was measured at all points in each visual field, and five visual fields for each animal were used for the measurement. According to the manufacturer's instructions, sections were also stained with Periodic Acid Schiff stain (PAS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, #395) to visualize intracellular glycogen. For immunohistochemical staining, tissue sections were deparaffinized and then rehydrated in graded ethanol from 100% to 75%. For antigen retrieval, sections were incubated with 0.1% proteinase K (#19131, Qiagen) for 15 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS, sections were subjected to UltraSensitiveTM SP (Mouse/Rabbit) IHC Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (MXB KIT-9720, MXB Biotechnologies, China). Brown signals were visualized using DAB (MXB 0031, MXB Biotechnologies, China). Slides without primary antibodies were used as negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Avian Leukosis Virus Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Those samples that tested positive for infection by ELISA were also tested by IFA. Briefly, the plasma was used to inoculate a monolayered 24-well plate. After incubation for 2 h, the supernatant was removed, and a 1% FBS cell maintenance solution was added to prolong the culture for 4–5 days. After fixing and sealing the cells, the ALV-specific monoclonal antibody JE9 (kindly provided by Dr. Aijian Qin, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China) as the primary antibody and FITC-labeled antimouse IgG (Bioss, Beijing, China) were used. Cell morphology was observed under a fluorescence microscope, with images recorded using NIS-Elements BR analysis software (Nikon, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Kidney Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed in 4 μm formalin-fixed kidney slides. Sections were deparaffinised and endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 2% hydrogen peroxide/methanol. Pronase, Proteinase K and heat mediated sodium citrate antigen retrieval was performed for NIMP, F4/80 and C3 staining respectively. Afterwards endogenous avidin and biotin were blocked. Blocking solution and primary antibody was added overnight (NIMP, F4/80 and C3 from Abcam). After the addition of secondary biotinylated antibody and ABC, sections were developed with DAB, counterstain with Mayer’s haematoxylin and mounted with Pertex. NIMP+ cells were manually counted in at least 15 random glomeruli per section. F4/80 and C3 morphometric image analysis was performed at 400 × using Nikon Eclipse Upright microscope and NIS-Elements BR Analysis software from Nikon. At least 10 random glomeruli were analysed per kidney and data is expressed as percentage of positive staining per glomeruli.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!