The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using foxp3 perm buffer

1

Analysis of FUT8, Ki67, P-gp and MRP1 in HCV-infected cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HCVcc-infected cells or Huh7.5.1 cells (2 × 107 each) were transfected with pcDNA3.1-FUT8, FUT8-siRNA or empty vector. After 48 h, the cells were harvested and washed with PBS buffer and then were fixed with 200 μL of fixation buffer and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. Cells were washed with BioLegend’s FOXP3 Perm buffer and then were placed in sterile conical tubes in aliquots of 5 × 105 cells in 100 μL BioLegend’s FOXP3 Perm buffer each. For Ki67 staining, the cells were stained with the FITC-conjugated Ki67 antibody and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The cells were then washed with BioLegend Cell Staining buffer and resuspended in 0.5 mL Cell Staining buffer for flow cytometric analysis. For the detection of P-gp and MRP1, the cells were stained with anti-MRP1, anti-P-gp rabbit mAbs or rabbit IgG (isotype) (Cell Signaling Technology) followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat IgG anti-rabbit IgG. Three independent experiments were performed for each analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Foxp3 Expression Analysis of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assessment of intracellular Foxp3 expression was used to identify regulatory T cells. Activated CD4+ T cells were prepared as described above. These were stained with antibodies specific to CD4, Vγ2 and Thy1.2 prior to resuspension in 200 μl of Foxp3 Fix/Perm solution (Biolegend) and incubation in the dark for 20 min. Cells were washed once with FACS buffer, followed by washing with Foxp3 Fix/Perm buffer. Supernatant was discarded completely, and cells resuspended in 200 μl Foxp3 Perm buffer (Biolegend). Cells were incubated in the dark for a further 15 min and then centrifuged to remove supernatant. The pellet was resuspended in 20 μl anti-Foxp3-PE conjugate (Biolegend) with incubation in the dark for 30 min. Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and Foxp3 expression determined by flow cytometric analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Analysis of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung, spleen, and tracheobronchial lymph nodes (TBLN) were isolated at necropsy. Lungs were minced and incubated in the presence of collagenase D for 1h. Digested tissues were mechanically disrupted by passage through a 70 μm filter. Single cell suspensions from this process were layered over a ficoll gradient and centrifuged to recover live cells. TBLN and spleen were mechanically disrupted and RBC lysed using ACK. To identify Tregs, cells were stained with anti-CD4 antibody (Clone L200, BD Bioscience). Following washing cells were permeabilized using BioLegend FOXP3 Fix/Perm and FOXP3 Perm buffer (BioLegend) followed by incubation with anti-FoxP3 antibody (Clone 206D, BioLegend). Samples were acquired on a BD FacsCanto II and analyzed with Diva software (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

DAPI Staining of Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This test was carried out using the previously described method25 (link). Briefly, all treated/untreated cell lines were cultured on sterile cover slip sets at the bottom of each 6-well cell culture plate (cell density 120 × 104/each well). At the end of each time point (12, 24, and 48 h), the cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 5 min and were permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min. Then, 50 µl of diluted 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenyl indole (DAPI) was diluted 1:2000 with its buffer (FOXP3 Perm Buffer, BioLegend, San Diego, USA) and added to each well. After 5 min incubation at room temperature, the cells were washed with sterile PBS (pH 7.2). The stained cells on cover slips were reversely placed on the slides and then were analyzed using a fluorescent microscope (Olympus BX61, Center Valley, PA, USA) equipped with a U-MWU2 fluorescence filter (excitation filter BP 330–385, dichromatic mirror DM 400, and emission filter LP 420).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Foxp3+ Regulatory T-Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prediluted antibodies were prepared for staining of cell surface markers. For intracellular staining, cells were permeabilized in Foxp3 Fix/Perm solution (BioLegend) and incubated with anti-Foxp3 antibodies diluted in Foxp3 Perm buffer (BioLegend). The antibodies used: anti-CD3-PerCP (clone 145-2C11, BioLegend), anti-CD4-Pacific blue (clone RM4-5, BioLegend), anti-Foxp3-Alexa Fluor 488 (clone FJK-16s, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and anti-Nrp-1-APC (clone 3DS304M, Thermo Fisher Scientific). FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo software (BD Biosciences) were used to collect and analyze the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

VEGFR2 Surface and Total Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50,000 HDMEC were seeded in 6‐well plate overnight and then stimulated with different combinations of the following reagents: 50 ng/ml hVEGF165, 2 μg/ml ephrinB2Fc, and 30 μM axitinib (Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) 29. After 30 min of stimulation, cells were collected and stained for surface and total VEGF‐R2, as previously described 65. Briefly, non‐fixed and non‐permeabilized HDMEC were first stained with Alexa647‐anti‐VEGFR2 (clone HKDR‐1; Biolegend) to label only the surface receptor. Subsequently, cells were fixed and permeabilized with the FOXP3 Fix/Perm buffer (Biolegend) and were split into two tubes, where one half was stained again with PE‐anti‐VEGFR2 (clone 7D4‐6, Biolegend) in FOXP3 Perm buffer to visualize total cellular VEGFR2, while the other half was not stained. Analysis was performed with a Fortessa FACS analyzer (Becton Dickinson).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Peritoneal Fluid Cell Processing for Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All collected peritoneal fluid samples were centrifuged at 1600 rpm, at 4 °C for 9 min, then supernatant was discarded, and cells were fixed with 4% par formaldehyde (Sheng Gong, Shanghai, China) for 35 min, at 4 °C in the dark. Then cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA). After centrifugation and removal of the supernatant, the fixed cells were resuspended in Foxp3 Perm Buffer (10 × , Biolegend, San Diego, USA) according to the manufacturer protocol. Finally, these cells were labeled with flow cytometry antibodies according to the manufacturer protocol and detected by flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Proliferation and Cytokine Profiling of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess proliferation, CD4+ T cells were stained with either 1 µM of CTV or CTFR (both from Life Technologies), before stimulation and culture. To assess intracellular cytokine expression after cell culture, cells were stimulated for 3 h in the presence of PMA (50 ng/mL, Sigma‐Aldrich), ionomycin (750 ng/mL, Sigma‐Aldrich), and GolgiStop (BD Biosciences); GolgiPlug (BD Biosciences) was additionally added for complete blocking of TNF export when measuring expression of mTNF. Cells were labelled with a fixable viability dye (LIVE/DEAD fixable dead cell stains, ThermoFisher Scientific). Cells were subsequently washed and stained extracellularly, followed by fixation with 2% PFA (paraformaldehyde, Sigma‐Aldrich), permeabilization using the FOXP3 perm buffer (BioLegend). Cells were stained with various combinations of the following fluorescently conjugated antibodies (see Supporting Information Table 1). Stained cells were acquired using a FACSCantoII or LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences); in most experiments, 100 000 T cell events were recorded. All flow cytometry data were analysed using FlowJo software (version 10, Tree Star, Ashland, USA). Representative CD4+ T cell gating strategy is shown in Supporting Information Fig. 2. Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry in immunological studies were adhered to 38.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multicolor Flow Cytometry and Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometric and cell sorting were performed using a LSRII or Fortessa (BD) and a FACS Aria II (BD), respectively. Data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star). For intracellular cytokine staining, splenocytes were cultured for 1 hour in the presence of 20 ng/mL PMA (VWR Scientific) and 750 ng/mL ionomycin (VWR Scientific) and for an additional 2 hours in the presence of 10 ug/mL brefeldin A (Biolegend). Cells were treated with DNAse (Sigma), surface stained for CD4 and TS1 and treated with Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD). Perm/Wash (BD) was used for intracellular staining with IFN-γ PE (XMG1.2; Biolegend). For FOXP3 staining, cells were surface stained for CD4 and TS1, treated with FOXP3 Fix/Perm buffer (Biolegend) and stained for FOXP3 in FOXP3 perm buffer (Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phenotyping of NK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NK cells were stained for 20 min (37 °C/5% CO2) with 7-AAD (A1310, Thermo Fisher Scientific) to distinguish live and dead cells. Cells were fixed using 1% paraformaldehyde, washed with FACS buffer (0.09% sodium azide and 2% FBS in DPBS), and permeabilizated with FOXP3 Perm buffer (353097, BioLegend) for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were then resuspended, incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark with a fluorochrome-conjugated antibody, and washed twice with FACS buffer. Cells were analyzed using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) and data were analyzed using CytExpert (Beckman Coulter) and FlowJo software (Treestar Inc, Ashland, Oregon). The antibodies used are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!