The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Constant current isolated stimulator

Manufactured by Digitimer
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Constant Current Isolated Stimulator is a laboratory equipment designed to deliver controlled electrical stimulation. It provides a constant current output, ensuring consistent and reliable stimulation across various experimental setups.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using constant current isolated stimulator

1

Hippocampal LTP Induction and Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For input–output curves and LTP experiments, fEPSPs evoked by Schaffer collateral stimulation with stainless-steel stereotrodes (1 MΩ, P1 Technologies) were recorded in current-clamp mode with micropipettes filled with 1 M NaCl using a Multiclamp 700B amplifier and Clampex software (Molecular Devices). Signals were low-pass filtered at 2 kHz and digitized at 50 kHz. The recording micropipette was placed in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. The intensity of the stimulator was increased stepwise until a maximal response was obtained using a constant current isolated stimulator (Digitimer). The slope of the fEPSP (mV/ms) was measured. PPR measurements were obtained every 20 s at a 40-ms interstimulus interval. The LTP protocol consisted of 10 min of stable baseline: 30 pulses every 20 s (stimulus strengths were <50% of the strength evoking a maximal response); 1 min conditioning: trains (10 pulses at 100 Hz) repeated four times every 20 s; then a 60 min post-conditioning period at the same baseline stimulation frequency: The synaptic strength change was measured from the slope of the fEPSP and data were expressed as a percentage of change with respect to the average baseline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hippocampal LTP Induction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
fEPSPs were elicited in the CA1 area of hippocampus by placing a bipolar concentric stimulating electrode (FHC) in the Schaffer collateral pathway. The electrode was connected to a constant current isolated stimulator (Digitimer). A low impedance glass pipette (1–2 MΩ) was filled with artificial cerebrospinal fluid and placed immediately below the CA1 stratum pyramidale. Recordings were performed in current clamp I = 0 mode, using a Multiclamp 700 A/Digidata 1440 A system (Molecular Devices). First, the input–output relationship was constructed and the stimulus intensity resulting in 30% of maximal response amplitude was found. After achieving a stable baseline response, LTP was induced by using the high-frequency stimulation protocol (1 train of stimuli at 100 Hz, lasting 500 ms, repeated four times with an inter-train interval of 20 s). After LTP induction, fEPSP amplitude and slope were monitored for at least 60 min and data were analyzed63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

M1 Local Field Potential Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LFPs were recorded using a Blackrock detecting system (Blackrock Microsystems LLC, Salt Lake City, USA), and continuous data were analyzed using NeuroExplorer 5.0 software (NeuroExplorer, Colorado Springs, USA). The spectrum and power spectral density of continuous data were calculated. The LFP was extracted from the raw broadband signal recorded in the M1 zone by bandpass filtering between 1 and 250 Hz. Band-limited LFP signals were generated with the following bandwidth settings: beta (12–40 Hz) [26 (link),28 (link)]. A constant current-isolated stimulator (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, UK) delivered continuous electrical pulses to the STN electrodes at an intensity below the threshold for induced movement (50–250 mA) [29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Minimal Stimulation-Evoked Responses in NAcSh MSNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were made from MSNs located in the ventral-medial NAcSh. During recordings, slices were superfused with aCSF, heated to 30–32°C by passing the solution through a feedback-controlled in-line heater (Warner, CT) before entering the recording chamber. To measure minimal stimulation-evoked responses, the coefficient of variance, or the ratio of EPSC amplitude between D1R and D2R MSNs, electrodes (2–5 MΩ) were filled with a cesium-based internal solution (in mM: 135 CsMeSO3, 5 CsCl, 5 TEA-Cl, 0.4 EGTA (Cs), 20 HEPES, 2.5 Mg-ATP, 0.25 Na-GTP, 1 QX-314 (Br), pH 7.3). Picrotoxin (100μM) was included in the aCSF during recordings to inhibit GABAA receptor-mediated currents. Presynaptic afferents were stimulated by a constant-current isolated stimulator (Digitimer, UK), using a monopolar electrode (glass pipette filled with aCSF). Series resistance was 9–20 M, uncompensated, and monitored continuously during recording. Cells with a change in series resistance beyond 15% were not accepted for data analysis. Synaptic currents were recorded with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier, filtered at 2.6–3kHz, amplified 5 times, and then digitized at 20kHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Minimal Stimulation-Evoked Responses in NAcSh MSNs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were made from MSNs located in the ventral-medial NAcSh. During recordings, slices were superfused with aCSF, heated to 30–32°C by passing the solution through a feedback-controlled in-line heater (Warner, CT) before entering the recording chamber. To measure minimal stimulation-evoked responses, the coefficient of variance, or the ratio of EPSC amplitude between D1R and D2R MSNs, electrodes (2–5 MΩ) were filled with a cesium-based internal solution (in mM: 135 CsMeSO3, 5 CsCl, 5 TEA-Cl, 0.4 EGTA (Cs), 20 HEPES, 2.5 Mg-ATP, 0.25 Na-GTP, 1 QX-314 (Br), pH 7.3). Picrotoxin (100μM) was included in the aCSF during recordings to inhibit GABAA receptor-mediated currents. Presynaptic afferents were stimulated by a constant-current isolated stimulator (Digitimer, UK), using a monopolar electrode (glass pipette filled with aCSF). Series resistance was 9–20 M, uncompensated, and monitored continuously during recording. Cells with a change in series resistance beyond 15% were not accepted for data analysis. Synaptic currents were recorded with a MultiClamp 700B amplifier, filtered at 2.6–3kHz, amplified 5 times, and then digitized at 20kHz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Electrophysiological Study of Bergmann Glia and Purkinje Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Borosilicate recording electrodes were manufactured as previously described [19 (link)]. Internal solution consisted of (mM): K-gluconate (110), KCl (5), HEPES (50), EGTA (0.05), MgSO4 (4), ATP (4), GTP (0.2), phosphocreatine (9), and pH to 7.4 with 1 M KOH. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from Bergmann glia (holding potential -80 mV) and Purkinje neuron (holding potential -70 mV) somata in the Purkinje cell layer. Currents were low pass filtered at 4–5 kHz and sampled at 25 kHz, using Spike2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK). Series resistances ranged from 5 to 15 MΩ and were compensated by >85% in Purkinje neuron recordings, but uncompensated in glial recordings.
Parallel fibres were stimulated with a patch electrode (~1–2 MΩ) filled with bath solution and positioned in the molecular layer, connected to an isolated constant current stimulator (6.5–90 μA, 80 μs; Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). Stimulus was delivered as a pair of pulses with a 100 ms interval at a frequency of either 0.033 Hz or 1 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vivo Neuronal Connectivity Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging and physiology data were acquired using National Instruments boards and SciScan (Scientifica) and WinWCP (University of Strathclyde) respectively. Electrical stimulation was via a tungsten bipolar electrode (WPI) and an isolated constant current stimulator (Digitimer). Optical stimulation was via wide field irradiance with 473 nm LED light (CoolLED) as described above. Data was analyzed using custom routines written in Python 3.6. Current step data was analyzed using routines based around the Neo and eFEL packages. For synaptic connectivity experiments, amplitudes of PSPs were taken as averages over a 1-ms time window around the peak. For connectivity analysis, a cell was considered connected if the light-induced response was greater than 6 times the standard deviation of baseline.
Two-photon image reconstruction and analysis was carried out using VIAS and NeuronStudio83 (link), before further analysis was carried out using custom scripts in Python 3.6 based on the NeuroML package from the Human Brain Project. The online Human Brain Project morphology viewer was used for visualizing reconstructed neurons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purkinje Neuron and Bergmann Glia Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Borosilicate recording electrodes were manufactured as previously described [6 (link)]. Internal solution consisted of (mM) K-gluconate (110), KCl (5), HEPES (50), EGTA (0.05), MgSO4 (4), ATP (4), GTP (0.2), phosphocreatine (9), and pH to 7.4 with 1 M KOH. For 16 Hz tetanus and forskolin experiments the internal solution was supplemented with 10 mM BAPTA. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from Bergmann glia (holding potential −80 mV) and Purkinje neuron (holding potential −70 mV) somata in the Purkinje cell layer. Currents were low pass filtered at 4-5 kHz and sampled at 25 kHz, using Spike2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK). Series resistances ranged from 5 to 15 MΩ and were compensated by >85% in Purkinje neuron recordings but uncompensated in glial recordings.
Parallel fibres were stimulated with a patch electrode (~1-2 MΩ) filled with bath solution and positioned in the molecular layer, connected to an isolated constant current stimulator (5–40 μA, 80 μs; Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). Stimulus was delivered as a pair of pulses with a 100 ms interval at a frequency of 0.033 Hz. Tetanic stimulation was delivered at 16 Hz (single pulses) for a 15 s period.
Experiments were performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bergmann Glia Whole-Cell Recordings and Parallel Fiber Stimulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Borosilicate recording electrodes were manufactured as previously described [15 (link)]. Internal solution consisted of (mM): K-gluconate (110), KCl (5), HEPES (50), EGTA (0.05), MgSO4 (4), ATP (4), GTP (0.2), phosphocreatine (9), and pH to 7.4 with 1 M KOH, plus 1 mg/mL Lucifer yellow. Whole-cell voltage clamp recordings were made from Bergmann glia (holding potential -80 mV) somata in the Purkinje cell layer. Currents were low pass filtered at 4–5 kHz and sampled at 25 kHz, using Spike2 software (CED, Cambridge, UK). Series resistances ranged from 5 to 15 MΩ and were uncompensated.
Parallel fibres were stimulated with a patch electrode (~1–2 MΩ) filled with bath solution and positioned in the midpoint of the molecular layer, connected to an isolated constant current stimulator (100 μA, 80 μs; Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). Stimulus was delivered as a pair of pulses with a 100 ms interval at a frequency of either 0.033 Hz or 1 Hz; a stimulus protocol that has been shown to be the most effective mechanism for depression of ectopic release [15 (link)], due to the increased release probability for the facilitated second pulse.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!