The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using gel imaging system

1

Protein Isolation and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins from cells or exosomes were isolated using RIPA lysis buffer (R0020; Solarbio, Beijing, China) and quantified using a BCA detection kit (P0009; Beyotime, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins with suitable concentrations were separated using sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (WGPVDF22; Servicebio, Wuhai, China). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-CD63 (ab134045; Abcam, Shanghai, China), anti-TSG101 (ab30871; Abcam, Shanghai, China), anti-VDR (PA5-109276; Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and anti-GAPDH (GB11002; Servicebio, Wuhai, China), after blocking with 5% blocking solution. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with a secondary antibody (IH-0011; DingGuo, Beijing, China) at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands and gray values were visualized and quantified using a gel imaging system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Liver Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from the liver using a protein extraction kit (Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). Equal amounts of protein per sample were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking with 5% skimmed milk in Tris Buffered Saline with Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature, the proteins were incubated overnight with primary antibodies against AMPK (#2532S, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), p-AMPK (#2535S, CST), CPT-1A (15184-1-AP, Proteintech Group, Rosemont, USA), FAS (Abp51334, Abbkine, CA, USA), GSK-3β (#9315, CST), PGC-1α (2178S, CST), IL-6 (bs-0379R, Bioss, Beijing, China), TNFα (ab6671, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C. The membranes were then probed with anti-rabbit secondary antibody IgG (HRP) (ab6721, Abcam) or anti-mouse secondary antibody IgG (HRP) (ab197767, Abcam) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing thrice with TBST, the blots were developed using a chemiluminescence reagent (P0018A, Shanghai Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China), and the positive bands were visualized with a Gel Imaging System (General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA). The band intensities were measured using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ArcA Transcription Factor Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E. coli BL21 (DE3) with pET28a-arcA+ was grown in 200 ml of LB medium for 5 h at 30 °C, and protein expression was induced by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl beta-D-1-thio-galactopyranoside (IPTG). The ArcA-His6 fusion protein was purified using an Ni-NTA-Sefinose Column (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China #C600791) in accordance with the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Phosphorylation reactions of ArcA were carried out as described previously [20 (link)]. EMSAs were performed by adding increasing amounts of purified and phosphorylated ArcA-His6 fusion protein (0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2,1.6 and 2.0 μg) to the DNA probe (50 ng) in binding buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 100 mM KCl, 10% glycerol) for 30 min at 37 °C. DNA–protein complexes were separated by 6% PAGE in 0.5 × TBE buffer (44.5 mM Tris, 44.5 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) at 160 V for 1 h. Gels were stained with GelRed for 10 min and imaged using a gel imaging system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of DNA Origami Carriers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both DNA origami carriers and the BMEPC-loaded complexes were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM), UV–vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectra, and agarose gel electrophoresis (AGE). AFM imaging was done in tapping-in-buffer mode: 10 μL of sample was deposited in mica and left to adsorb to the surface for at least 10 min; subsequently, the sample was washed 3 times with ddH2O, and then 1× TAE-Mg2+ buffer was added before imaging. One % AGE staining with ethidium bromide (EB) was done at room temperature. The gels were applied by a constant voltage of 80 V for 40 min in 1× TAE-Mg2+ buffer, and the images were collected by a gel imaging system (General Electric Co.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Extraction and Analysis from Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 100 mg liver sample was added to 1 mL RIPA lysate (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) with 10 μL PMSF (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), fully ground with homogenizer, then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C to collect the supernatant. A BCA kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China) was used to detect the protein concentration, and 30 μg protein samples were selected for 5−12% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. The gel was then transferred to the PVDF membrane, incubated overnight with the required primary antibody at 4 °C, and then incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody for 1 h at 37 °C. Images were collected in a gel imaging system (General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA) using an ECL luminescence solution and analyzed using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). All the information on antibodies is shown in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Co-Immunoprecipitation of LcMFN2 and LcMAVS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells seeded in 10-cm plates (1 × 107 cells/well) were co-transfected with 5 μg FLAG-tagged LcMFN2 and 5 μg His-tagged LcMAVS or empty vector. After 24 h, cells were lysed with prechilled lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris HCL, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1% Triton-X-100, and 1 mmol/L PMSF). Proteins were precipitated using BeyoMag™ Anti-Flag Magnetic Beads (Beyotime) at 4 °C for 6 h. Following three times washing with TBS/T, the immunocomplex was eluted with 3 X Flag Peptide (sigma). For immunoblotting, denatured proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and electro-imprinted on 0.2 μmol/L PVDF membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA) using a micro-trans-Blot cell system (Bio-Rad), and then blocked with Quick block blocking buffer (Beyotime). The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against FLAG-Tag (MBL, M185-3L, 1:10,000 dilution in TBS/T containing 1% non-fat dry milk) or His-Tag (1:3000 dilution in TBS/T containing 1% non-fat dry milk), followed by washing three times with TBS/T. Then, the membrane was probed with the HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Proteintech, SA0001-1, 1:10,000). Signals were detected using an ECL chemiluminescent system captured by a gel imaging system (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting of Whole-Cell Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-cell lysate analysis via SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting53 (link) 1 ODU of cells was lysed using CelLytic B 2× Cell lysis reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and run on standard SDS-PAGE using 12% polyacrylamide gels with 5x reducing sample buffer (8 M Urea, 10% SDS). In total, 15 µL of each sample were loaded and run for 30 min at 200 V. SDS-PAGEs were blotted on nitrocellulose membranes using the iBlotTM 1 gel transfer system (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and His-tagged nanobody was detected using α-His mouse antibody (05-949, LOT: 3033896, 1:1000, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) diluted in 2% skim milk, followed by incubation with a secondary HRP-conjugated rabbit α-mouse IgG (AP160P, 1:10,000, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) diluted in TBS-T. Proteins were visualised using the Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting System (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and an Amersham gel imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Quantification and Analysis in Chondrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were separated from chondrocytes and articular cartilage using pre-cooled radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (Beyotime, Haimen, China) containing protease inhibitor (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). After proteins quantification and denaturation, equal quantity of proteins were isolated using electrophoresis and then transferred into a polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, USA). Subsequently, this membrane was blocked by 5% skim milk for 1 h, and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing the membrane, the membrane was incubated with secondary antibody (Abcam, UK) for 2 h at room temperature. Finally, the protein band was visualized with the ECL regents (DINGGUO Biology, China) on Gel imaging system (GE Healthcare). In addition, the gray values of each band were analyzed using the Image J software. Primary antibodies in the study are as follows: FTO (ab126605, Abcam; 1:1000), ADAMTS5 (ab41037, Abcam; 1:1000), MMP13 (ab219620, Abcam; 1:1000), Collagen II (ab34712, Abcam; 1:1000), Aggrecan (ab3778, Abcam; 1:1000), PRKAA2 (ab126911, Abcam; 1:1000), and GAPDH (ab181602, Abcam; 1:2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total protein was isolated by the RIPA lysis buffer (Solarbio) according to the instruction procedures. The protein was quantified by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) detection kit (Beyotime, China). And then, 40 μg protein was loaded onto sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel, and then, the proteins were separated using the 10% SDS-PAGE. Subsequently, transfer protein bands onto the PVDF membranes (Millipore, USA). Then, the membrane was incubated with 5% skim milk at room temperature for 60 min. Then, the membranes were incubated by primary antibodies against anti-Rabbit RBM5 (Abcam, ab245646, 1 : 500) and anti-Rabbit GAPDH (Servicebio, GB11002, 1 : 1000) overnight at 4°C. After washing by PBS buffer for 3 times, the membranes were then incubated with the Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (Abcam, ab205718, 1 : 2000) at room temperature for 70 min. Finally, the protein bands were visualized by Gel imaging system (GE Healthcare) under ECL regent. The protein band was quantified using the Image J software (U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying GPR30, E-cadherin, and Vimentin Protein Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GC cells were treated with a series of concentrations of drugs for 48 hours. The cells were then lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology) containing protease inhibitor at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined using a BCA protein kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The protein was separated by 10%‐15% sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE), then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk and then incubated with primary antibodies against GPR30 (Abcam), E‐cadherin and vimentin (Cell Signaling Technology) overnight at 4°C. Finally, the membranes were incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) for 2 hours after washing with Tris‐buffered saline with Tween (TBST). The blot was visualized using a chemiluminescence kit (GE Healthcare), and protein expression was determined by a Syngene gel imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!