The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Optotrak

Manufactured by Northern Digital
Sourced in Canada

The Optotrak is a motion capture system designed for precise measurement and tracking of 3D movement. It utilizes optical sensors to capture the position and orientation of markers placed on objects or individuals. The Optotrak provides accurate data on the real-time movement of these markers, which can be used for various applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using optotrak

1

Biomechanical Testing of Spinal Segments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were attached to a universal testing machine (MTS 30/G) using specially designed holding jigs. Flexion, extension, and lateral bending were attained by applying a 200 N load at a rate of 2 mm/sec to the loading arm connecting the cup containing the thoracic end of the spine while the cup with the sacral end was fixed to the base of the loading frame (Fig. 1A). Axial rotation of ±8° of the specimen was achieved by coupling the thoracic end to a servo motor rotating at 2°/sec with the sacral end fixed (Fig. 1B). A 50N preload (follower load) was applied from L1 to L5. During all testing, 3-dimensional specimen motion was recorded using an optical motion-tracking device (Optotrak, Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada). The apparatus was designed to apply compressive follower preload representing the physiologic preload acting in the lumbar spine and maintaining the spine alignment. This was applied using bilateral cables passing freely through guides anchored to each vertebra. Additional load for flexion and extension was applied with a compressive force that varied between 200–300 N with a lever arm of 1.5 cm and allowed for a combined moment of 4.5–6 Nm. Most of the reported experiments using the follower method reported a pure moment load between 4–8 Nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Wheelchair-Based Kinematic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kinematic data were collected using an optoelectronic camera system (Optotrak, Northern Digital, Waterloo, Canada) at 100Hz with technical cluster markers attached to the right side of the participant’s body and to the rigid frame of the wheelchair (Fig 3). The location of anatomical landmarks was determined in relation to their technical clusters. Based on this calibration procedure, the positions of the anatomical landmarks were reconstructed for each participant (Fig 3) and used to create the joint coordinate systems of the shoulder, elbow and wrist [14 (link)]. The location of the rotation center of the glenohumeral joint was calculated using the regression method proposed by Meskers et al. [15 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Kinematic Analysis of Lifting and Walking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To analyse movement patterns during lifting and walking, we recorded 3D kinematics with an optoelectronic motion capture system (Optotrak, Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo ON, Canada) at a sample rate of 50 Hz. In the lifting trials, segment kinematics were measured using a dynamic three-dimensional linked segment model (Kingma et al. 2010) (link). Cluster markers were attached to lower and upper leg, pelvis, trunk, upper and lower arm, head and box. Due to the fact that participants performed symmetric lifting, we only recorded kinematics from the right side of the body. To define the local segmental coordinate systems, anatomical landmarks were located through palpation and were related to the respective cluster markers using separate measurements (cf. Kingma et al. 2010 (link)). In the walking trial, only stride parameters were recorded using single heel markers attached to both shoes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tracking Jaw and Hand Movements in Stuttering

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All thirty participants were tested individually during one approximately 2-3 hour visit, with the same procedure being carried out for each participant. Before testing started, the first author described the details of the study to the participants, who read and signed the informed consent form. Subsequently, each participant filled out two forms asking them for their educational history and prescription medication use. A 10-minute conversational speech sample was recorded from participants who stuttered (PWS).
In general, the testing session consisted of a series of tracking tasks performed with the jaw and dominant hand. Jaw and hand movements during tracking were recorded using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada), an optoelectronic position measurement system that tracks the three-dimensional motion of infrared-emitting diodes (IREDs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Vibration-Assisted Gait Biomechanics Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To apply HA vibration, a pair of custom-made mechanical vibrators was used, which consisted of two encased electromotors (Graphite Brushes S2326.946, Maxon, Sachseln, Switzerland) with an eccentric mass attached to the motor axis, driven in a velocity loop at 90 Hz (4-Q-DC Servo Control LSC 30/2, Maxon, Sachseln, Switzerland). Vibrators were bilaterally placed at 50% of the distance between the iliac crest and the greater trochanter of the femur and were tightly attached with an elastic strap. Custom-made software controlled the vibrators to allow stimulation to be coupled to the kinematics in the gait trials.
Kinematic data were collected using Optotrak (Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, Canada). Optotrak LED marker clusters were attached with elastic straps and tape on the posterior surface of both heels, shanks, thighs, the sacrum, and the thorax at the midpoint between the scapulas. Marker locations were tracked by two Optotrak camera systems and digitized at 50 samples/s. Ground reaction force data were measured by two force plates embedded in the treadmill (ForceLink, Culemborg, Netherlands) and digitized at 200 samples/s. The force time series were down-sampled to be synchronized with the kinematic data. Kinematic and force data were low-pass filtered with a cut-off frequency of 5 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Kinematic Analysis of Human Gait

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kinematic data were collected during walking at 100 Hz using Optotrak (Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada). Bilateral infrared-emitting markers were placed over the fifth metatarsal head, lateral malleolus, lateral femoral epicondyle, greater trochanter, iliac crest, and acromion process. Heel strike events were approximated as the maximum (positive) angle of the limb, and toe-off events were approximated as the minimum (negative) limb angle.31 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Aligning Motion Tracking System to Specimen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To align the motion tracking system (3D Investigator and Optotrak systems by Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada) to the physiological coordinate system of the specimen, a probe was used to digitize the extents of the sacral ala and the moment ring. The lateral axis was defined as the line connecting the left and right lateral extents of the moment ring (installed on the L4 vertebrae). The A–P axis was defined as the line connecting the anterior extent of the moment ring to the midpoint of lateral axis line. The combination of these two axes defined the transverse plane. And the origin was moved to the apex of the sacral ala. The Infrared motion markers were rigidly attached to the iliac brim and second sacral body [8 (link)–13 (link)].
Data from the markers were recorded during each loading interval at 100 Hz and a custom computer program executed by commercial software (MATLAB by MathWorks) extracted the peak motion observed during data collection from the raw data files. These data were used to find the range of motion in flexion–extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation in an intact, unilateral, and bilateral state for each specimen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Split-Belt Treadmill Kinematics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants walked on a split-belt treadmill (Woodway, Waukesha, WI, USA) and belt speeds were controlled using a custom Vizard program (WorldViz). Kinematic data were collected using infrared-emitting markers (Optotrak, Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON, Canada) at 100Hz (SI Appendix, Supplementary Methods).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Acetabular Fragment Stability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relative displacement of each fragment was measured using a 3D motion capture system (Optotrak, Northern Digital, Waterloo, ON). Load/displacement curves were plotted and analyzed for initial stiffness and the ultimate strength. Each specimen was then subjected to load-to-failure in stroke control at a rate of 20 mm/second while recording the applied load and relative displacements of each fragment. Failure was defined as a fracture of the sawbones model, screw pull-out, fracture of the screw, or displacement of the acetabular fragment by more than a centimeter. Ultimate strength (load force at point of failure) measured in Newton (N) and initial stiffness (N/mm) were compared between each construct group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Kinematics of Active Wheelchair Propulsion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kinematic data were collected using an optoelectronic camera system (Optotrak, Northern Digital, Waterloo, Canada) at 100Hz with technical cluster markers attached to the right side of the participants’ body and to the wheelchair (Figure 2, left). Prior to the actual experiment, a calibration measurement was performed to determine the location of anatomical landmarks in relation to their technical clusters. From these calibrations, the positions of the anatomical landmarks were reconstructed during the experiment (Figure 2, right), which in turn were used to construct joint coordinate systems of the shoulder, elbow and wrist [27 (link)]. The location of the glenohumeral (GH) rotation point was calculated using the regression method proposed by Meskers et al. [28 (link)].

Example of the marker placements and the reconstruction of anatomical landmarks. Left: Placement of the technical marker clusters during active wheeling on the motor driven treadmill. Right: Combination of kinematics and wheel kinetics showing a sample of the individual external reaction force and resulting torque around the wheel-axle, during the push phase. The anatomical landmarks used for the thorax (T) clavicle (C) Scapula (S) Upper arm (U) Lower arm (L) and Hand (H) comply with the ISB recommendations [27 (link)].

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!