The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Jmp 13.2.1 statistical software

Manufactured by SAS Institute

JMP 13.2.1 is a statistical software package developed by SAS Institute. It provides data analysis, visualization, and modeling capabilities. The software is designed to handle a variety of data types and offers a range of statistical procedures for users to explore and analyze their data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using jmp 13.2.1 statistical software

1

Predicting Aggressive Tumor Prognosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients were dichotomized into HR and LR disease if they had a distant metastasis or death before 5 years. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by performing multiple T-test corrected by the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure with an FDR of 0.1, using JMP 13.2.1 statistical software (SAS) and correlation between survival time in months and gene expression was also determined using JMP. Matlab statistics and machine learning toolbox was used to identify features (i.e., genes) using the univariate feature ranking function based on chi-square tests, or features were manually selected based on their ranks following differential analysis of gene expression (DEG) or correlation as described above, with a fourth list comprised of genes in common following DEG and correlation. For training, 89/99 samples were randomly chosen so as to leave out 10 samples (5 aggressive and 5 non-aggressive) for subsequent validation. Three models were chosen from the Matlab menu for training and validation, which included Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (quadratic SVM). For validation, sensitivity was defined as number of true aggressive tumors predicted divided by total number of true aggressive tumors, and specificity defined as true negatives predicted divided by all true negatives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Pancreatic Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fisher’s test was performed to compare the categorical data between IOPN and IPMN/IPNB and between pure IOPN and combined IOPN. Mann-Whitney’s U test was performed for comparing the sequential data. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. JMP 13.2.1 statistical software (SAS Institute, Incorporation, Cary, NC) was used for the analyses. P-values were calculated using Student’s t-test for the results of digital gene expression analyses using NanoString.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

DWI-ASPECTS and Lesion Volume Correlation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two stroke neurologists (T.Y., K.F.) independently evaluated baseline DWI and DWI‐ASPECTS. When the readers’ assessments differed, final consensus was obtained with a third reader (Kanta T). Interobserver agreement for DWI‐ASPECTS was assessed using weighted‐κ and intraclass correlation coefficients. VolDWI was measured retrospectively using an automated processing system (RAPID version 4.7, iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA) by apparent diffusion coefficient index <620×10−6 mm2/s, and unreliable blurry lesions which RAPID could not detect were manually measured (MIPAV, Ver 8.0.2, Bethesda, MA). The correlation between DWI‐ASPECTS and VolDWI was determined using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. To identify the optimal VolDWI threshold, receiver operating characteristic curves were assessed. Significance was set at P<0.05 for all tests. The statistical analyses were performed by JMP 13.2.1 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!