The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistical software version

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) is a software application for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. SPSS offers a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, factor analysis, and more. The software is designed to help users analyze and interpret data effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

178 protocols using spss statistical software version

1

Triplicate Measurements for Reliable Results

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the measurements were conducted in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reliability of the results. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS statistical software (Version 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To assess the significance, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the data. In this case, Duncan’s test was used to further analyze the data, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Additionally, the graphical representation of the data was created using Origin Pro software, specifically Version 8.0 by Stat-Ease Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparison of Swab and Saliva RT-PCR Tests

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were entered and analysed using SPSS statistical software version 24. Descriptive statistics for categorical variables are presented as number (percent) and for continuous variables as mean ±standard deviation (SD) or median (interquartile range; IQR). Comparison of means was carried out using Student’s t-test with statistical significance at 0.05. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Kappa coefficient was used to estimate agreement between swab and saliva RT-PCR test results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Dataset

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software (version 22.0, Chicago, IL, USA). Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments and analyzed with Student's t-test. Statistical tests included in this study for data analysis were the Chi-square test, the log-rank test, and the Student's t-test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was employed to distinguish independent prognostic factors. All tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Figures were generated using the GraphPad Prism software version 8.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparative Analgesic Efficacy Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All numerical data were analyzed with SPSS statistical software version 25. Data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparing the means of a variable in the five groups for all studied variables, except for the thermal withdrawal latency, where a repeated measure ANOVA was used to compare the means in all five groups, overtime. In case a statistically significant difference is detected by ANOVA, a posthoc test (Bonferroni test) was used to analyze the results further. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Pearson's correlation was used to test correlations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nutritional Behaviors and BMI Associations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software, version 21. Chi-square, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multivariate regression analysis were used to determine the relationship between nutritional behaviors and variables, such as Body Mass Index (BMI) and protein consumption. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Serum Thrombomodulin Levels in Pediatric Sepsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as median and interquartile range (IQR, 25th-75th percentile) or number (%). Since most continuous variables were skewed, nonparametric approaches were used in this study. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous and ordinal variables, and the chi-square test was used for nominal and categorical variables depending on the scale of measurement. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for test for differences when comparing more than two groups. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were determined to evaluate correlations between serum thrombomodulin level and severity score and other laboratory parameters.
Differences in serum thrombomodulin level between different pediatric sepsis syndromes and the controls were analyzed. Serum thrombomodulin levels were also compared between patients with and without DIC and with and without MODS, and between survivors and non-survivors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for day 1 serum thrombomodulin level to predict the development of septic shock, DIC, MODS, and mortality were plotted. The respective areas under the ROC curves and cut-off points were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software, version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All statistical tests were two-tailed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparing RFA and MWA Therapy Effectiveness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed with SPSS statistical software, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA), and GraphPad Prism software version 5.0 for windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA) was applied to draw the graphs. Values for quantitative variables were expressed as the mean ± SD (range). In the MWA or RFA group, one-way ANOVA and the Duncan’s test were used to compare the nodular maximal diameter and volume and the vascular, symptomatic and cosmetic scores between pre-procedure and at each follow-up.
Between the RFA and MWA groups, an independent-samples t-test was performed to compare the age, the mean ablation energy, time and power during the procedure, the nodular MDRR and VRR at each follow-up, and the vascular, symptomatic and cosmetic scores pre-procedure and after each follow-up. The χ2 test was applied for categorical variables, including gender distribution, the number of patients with multiple-nodules, the number of patients achieving therapeutic success, the number of regrown nodules, the number of nodules with complete disappearance, minor or major complications and side effects between the two groups.
All the tests were two sided. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

BAT Volume and Peptide Hormones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paired t-tests were used to compare the hormone levels between CE and thermoneutral conditions. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of BAT volume with serum concentrations of the peptide hormones of interest. Multivariate linear regression modeled the relation between each outcome and BAT volume, while adjusting for the potentially prognostic demographic covariates of body fat percent and age. BAT volume was log transformed for better centering and interpretation. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS© statistical software, version 23. All statistical tests assumed a 95% level of confidence. Correction for multiple comparisons was not performed due to the small sample of the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detailed Comparative Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated at least 3 times unless otherwise specified. Group data comparisons were conducted by t-test. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) in this study. Categorical parameters were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a log-rank test were used to determine survival. Correlation analysis was determined using Pearson's correlation. Statistical differences between groups were considered significant if P<0.05. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software (version 18.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Feeding and Discharge Outcomes in Preterm Infants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software, version 25. PGRF and TF infants were compared by independent sample t-test or Mann Whitney test for continuous variables, or chi-square tests for categorical ones. Multivariate analysis with Bonferroni correction was used to calculate the outcome measures using repeated measure analysis with interaction effect. Multiple linear regressions were used to assess prediction of days to full oral feeding and age at discharge. We included in the model universal variables as well as variables that were found to be significantly different between the two groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Sample size calculation was based on the main outcome measurement of the days needed to achieve full oral feeding. We calculated that a sample size of 30 infants was needed in each group in order to achieve a power of 90% and a level of significance of 5% (two-sided) for detecting a mean difference of −5.0 ± 1, day which was the matrix found by a previous study that assessed the same outcome (18 (link), 29 (link)). A number of 40 infants in each group was planned in order to compensate for possible dropout during the study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!