The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pjet vector

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The PJET vector is a plasmid designed for expression of recombinant proteins in bacterial systems. It provides a versatile platform for cloning and expression of target genes. The vector contains a T7 promoter, a multiple cloning site, and a selectable antibiotic resistance marker.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using pjet vector

1

Cloning and Expression of Gossypium arboreum Chalcone Synthase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GaCHS1 and GaCHS2 ORFs were tailored by adding BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites upstream to start and downstream to stop codons respectively using sense and antisense primers. The resulting CHSs were cloned with BamHI and EcoRI and excised from pJET vector (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). The clones were further confirmed by sequencing prior to their subcloning into the restriction sites of pre-digested and purified bacterial expression vector pGEX-4T-2. The cloned CHS proteins were expressed as fusion proteins with GST-tag at N-terminus of the expression vector. The heterologous expression of the recombinant proteins was carried out as described earlier [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Generating Pseudomonas Flagella Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phosphomutants ΔfliC-FL T27A and ΔfliC-FL S28A were generated by site directed mutation of phosphosites T27 and S28 to alanine, denoted by T27A and S28A, while the phosphomimic ΔfliC-FL S28D was generated by site directed mutation of phosphosite S28 to aspartate, denoted by S28D. The site-directed mutation for fliC T27A was created by fusion PCR approach, whereas, fliC S28A and fliC S28D were created by cloning full length fliC gene into pJET vector (Fermentas, USA), followed by mutagenesis using the Quik Change II XL Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA). Primers used in this study are listed in Table 2. The site directed mutants and full length fliC gene were cloned into pUC18-miniTn7T-GM vectors and electroporated into PAO1 ΔfliC. The clones were verified by genomic DNA isolation and sequencing of mTn7 insertion site. The following names were used for the resulting strains: ΔfliC- FL T27A (complemented threonine phosphomutant), ΔfliC- FL (complemented full length FliC), ΔfliC- FL S28A (complemented serine phosphomutant) and ΔfliC-FL S28D (complemented serine phosphomimic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Yeast ATM1 and ATM3 Protein Engineering

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first 58 codons of the ATM1 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were removed, and a C-terminal His6 tag and XbaI site were introduced by PCR using primer Sc_tr and Sc_Rev_His (for all primer sequences see supplemental Table S1). The PCR product was cloned into pJET vector (Fermentas). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the QuikChange lightning kit (Stratagene) to introduce the ΔK475 mutation with primers Atm1_DK_For and Atm1_DK_Rev. Wild-type and mutant ATM1 were reamplified by PCR and cloned into pNZ8048 to generate pNZ_Atm1 and pNZ_Atm1ΔK475.
ATM3 expression constructs were generated using the backbone exchange method (32 (link)). N-terminally truncated versions of ATM3 were amplified using ATM3_FX_Rev and ATM3_FX30_For, ATM3_FX60_For, or ATM3_FX97_For and cloned into vector pREX containing a C-terminal His10 tag as described (32 (link), 33 (link)). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using primers ATM3_EQ_For and ATM3_EQ_Rev.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cloning and Sequencing Full-Length cDNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full length cDNA was obtained by performing 5′ and 3′ RACE-PCR and assembling the respective RACE fragments (Table 1) employing high fidelity Taq polymerase, Fermentas. The PCR program included an initial denaturation of 94°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94°C (30 sec), annealing at 55°C (30 sec), extension at 72°C (3 min), and final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The resolved PCR fragment was visualized under ultraviolet light and gel electrophoresed on 1.2% agarose. The PCR amplicon corresponding to putative full length gene was gel purified by Qiagen gel purification kit according to manufacturer's instruction and cloned in pJET vector, Fermentas. The full length clone was confirmed through sequencing of the plasmid DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Mitochondrial Dysfunction Analysis in Skin Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The patient skin fibroblasts and control skin fibroblasts were grown in high glucose DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. The fibroblasts were seeded on coverslips inside a Petri dish filled with medium on day 2, then changed into medium containing 200 nM MitoTrackerR probe (Invitrogen, cat No.M7512) on day 3, and incubated for a further 30 minutes. Cells were then stained with DAPI, and observed using a laser Confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM710). The mitochondrial lengths in the fibroblasts were measured using Image J28 (link).
Total RNA were isolated from patient skin fibroblasts and control with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, cat No.15596-026) following the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA synthesis was carried out with M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, cat No. 28025-013). The forward primer 5′-AAGGTGTCAGACAAAGAGAAAATTGAC-3′ and the reverse primer 5′ -TTATTTCTCCTGATGAAGAGCTTCAATG-3′ were used to amplify the coding sequence of OPA1 gene, which harbors the mutation sequence, from the patient fibroblasts, then the PCR fragments were cloned into pJET vector (Fermentas cat No.K1231)and individual clones were picked and then Sanger sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification and Sequencing of MYC and TP53

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This assay was adapted from published procedures [13 (link), 34 (link)]. Genomic DNA was extracted from samples using a PureGene protocol (Gentra) and quantified using Nanodrop instrumentation (ThermoFisher Scientific). 20 ng of genomic DNA was subjected to one round of normal high denaturation temperature PCR using Taq Polymerase (Denville) and primers for MYC (5’-ACGTTAGCTTCACCAACAGG and 3’TTCATCAAAAACATCATCATCCAG) or TP53 (5’GAGCTGGAGCTTAGGCTCCAGAAAGGACAA and 3’TTCCTAGCACTGCCCAACAACACCAGC). 383 bp and 376 bp PCR products were purified and quantified using qPCR with nested primer sets and SYBR Green detection (Roche 480 LightCycler; 5’ACGAGGAGGAGAACTTCTACCAGCA and 3’TTCATCTGCGACCCGGACGACGAGA for MYC and 5’TTCTCTTTTCCTATCCTGAGTAGTGGTAA and 3’TTATGCCTCAGATTCACTTTTATCACCTTT for TP53). Equivalent amounts of each PCR product were then used for 3D-PCR using the same nested PCR primer sets. The resulting 291 and 235 bp products were fractionated by agarose gel electrophoresis, purified using QIAEX II (Qiagen), cloned into a pJet vector (Fermentas), and subjected to sequencing (GENEWIZ). Alignments and mutation calls were done with Sequencher (Gene Codes Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated SEPT2 knockout in RPE1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated chromosomal deletion was used for generating knockout human SEPT2 cells in RPE1 Tet3G cells. Two gRNAs targeting human SEPT2 exon 4 (5′‐ggggttcgagttcactctgatgg‐3′) and 6 (5′‐ccggctacggggatgccatcaac‐3′) were cloned into Cas9 system expression plasmid pX458 to generate pTK58 and pTK60 (Appendix Table S1). RPE1 Tet3G cells were transfected with pTK58 or pTK60 by electroporation (Neon® Transfection System) according to the manufacture's protocol. One day after electroporation, GFP positive cells were FACS‐sorted and subjected to single cell dilutions. Single clones were allowed to expand for 10–14 days before they were subjected to immunoblotting to check SEPT2 protein levels as well as genomic amplification followed by cloning into pJET vector (Thermo Fischer Scientific). The plasmids were then sequenced to identify clones containing two SEPT2‐mutated alleles with premature stop codons (Individual clone information is shown in Appendix Fig S3E). Two independent clones were selected per gRNA for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-cell genome editing analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fibroblast colonies that formed in the presence of MMC were collected and expanded in 96 well plates. Cells were harvested, centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3000 rpm to remove media and dissolved in 100 μl Direct PCR Tail Lysis solution (VIAGEN) with Proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich). Cell lysis took place overnight at 55° C followed by a 15 minutes 82° C heat inactivation step. 1 μl cell lysate was added to 24 μl PCR mix. PCR assays were performed as for the Surveyor assay, products were cloned into the pJET vector (ThermoScientific) and transformed into E. coli DH5α (New England Biolabs). Five to ten random colonies were picked from each bacterial plate representing Fancf alleles from a single cell clone. PJet inserts were amplified and Sanger sequencing was performed to assess gene editing-mediated DNA alterations in Fancf (Suppl. Table 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cloning and Modification of At5g17960

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For 35S::At5g17960, full-length coding sequence of At5g17960 was PCR amplified using A15 FP and A15 RP and cloned into pJET vector (Thermo Scientific). Subsequently, the gene was released using XhoI/HindIII and cloned into pGREEN 35S vector digested with the same restriction enzymes. To construct amiR::At5g17960, amiRNA sequence (5’-GCGGGAAGCAAGTATCCACTT-3’) was designed using the amiRNA designer interface WMD [13 (link), 14 (link)]. The sequence was introduced into Arabidopsis miR319a precursor by overlapping PCR using primers (A15_I_mIR, A15_II_mIR, A15_III_mIR, A15_IV_mIR) and pRS300 plasmid as the template. The resulting fragment was cloned into pJET vector and subsequently digested with XhoI/SpeI and ligated into XhoI/SpeI digested linearized pGREEN 35S vector. All constructs were verified by sequencing. Primers used are listed in the S1 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of miR156 Cleavage Targets in Lotus japonicus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The target transcripts for miR156 cleavage were predicted using the psRNATarget web server by following the default parameter (http://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/). In addition, the mature sequence of L. japonicusmiR156 was used to conduct a manual BLAST search against the L. japonicus genome database and the NCBI EST database. This eliminated any false candidates that could form potential precursors for LjmiR156. After the redundant sequences were manually excluded, potential targets were chosen as candidates for cleavage-site validation using a modified 5′-RACE method (Song et al. 2010 (link)). This technique was performed with a FirstChoice RLM-RACE Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, but with a slight modification. Instead of removing 5′PO4, the adaptor was ligated directly to the RNA molecules, which were then subjected to reverse-transcription. Afterward, nested PCRs were run with outer/inner adaptor- and outer/inner gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table 1). The products were gel-purified and cloned into the pJET vector (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Eleven (11) clones for TC70253, 12 clones for AU089181, and 16 clones for TC57859 were sequenced to determine the cleavage sites of the two candidate genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!