The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti digoxigenin antibody

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Germany, Switzerland

The Alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and quantification of digoxigenin-labeled molecules. It is a conjugate of an anti-digoxigenin antibody and the enzyme alkaline phosphatase, which catalyzes a colorimetric reaction upon substrate addition, allowing for the visualization and measurement of digoxigenin-containing targets.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

72 protocols using alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti digoxigenin antibody

1

Generating RNA Probes for In Situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We made RNA probes from different templates: PCR products and linearized plasmid DNA. For PCR-based in situ templates, we designed PCR primers (listed in Supplemental Table 1) to amplify gene-specific products that contained the T3 promoter sequence, and RNA probes were transcribed in vitro using T3-RNA-polymerase. For the linearized plasmid DNA-based in situ templates, shh (HindIII/T7), atoh1a (Nco I /SP6), ptf1a (Nco I/SP6), reelin (NcoI/SP6), and roraa (ApaI/SP6), the last four plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. Sheng-Ping L. Hwang (Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, China). The antisense RNA probes were synthesized with T7 or SP6 RNA polymerase after plasmid DNA linearization. Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), as described previously [12 (link)]. Embryos were mounted in glycerol, and images were captured using a Nikon AZ100 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Situ Hybridization of Mouse HSPBP1 in Testes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A plasmid containing mouse HSPBP1 (GenBank: BC014758.1) in pCMV-SPORT6 (Life
Technologies) was used to generate sense and antisense digoxigenin-labeled RNA
probes by in vitro transcription (Roche, Nutley, NJ). We hybridized 100 ng of
probe to 7-μm wax sections of Bouin's fixed adult mouse testes at
50ºC overnight as described (Best
et al., 2008
). Bound probe was detected
using alkaline phosphatase–conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies
(Roche) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3′-indolyphosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium
substrate (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Sections were counterstained with
nuclear fast red. Seminiferous tubules were staged as described (Russell et al., 1990 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Whole-mount in situ Hybridization of Mouse Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were dissected at E9.5 (the day of plugs is E0.5), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, washed in PBST (PBS contain 0.1% tween-20), and dehydrated through a series of methanol/PBST (25%, 50%, 75% and 100%). Embryos were stored in pure methanol at −80°C. Every step was carried out by standard procedures.45 (link) Embryos were treated with proteinase K (10 μg/ml in PBST) for 10 minutes without rotation at room temperature. The concentration of the probe in the hybridization solution is 1 ng/μl. Probes, bounded with digoxigenin, were detected by alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Situ Hybridization of Monogenean Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EnCL1/EnCL3 gene-specific primers (Additional file 3) and first-strand cDNA of adult E. nipponicum were used for the PCR. The amplified products were ligated into pGEM®-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin) and verified by DNA sequencing. The constructs were linearised and used as a template for RNA probes. Both sense and anti-sense RNA probes were synthesised in vitro (Dig RNA Labelling Kit (SP6/T7); Roche, Basel, Switzerland). In situ hybridisation was performed using a modified protocol [44 (link)]. Briefly, the sections of adult worms on slides were incubated for 19 h at 41 °C (EnCL1) and at 37 °C (EnCL3) with specific RNA probes diluted 1:100 in a hybridisation mixture (5× SSC, 1× PBS, 50% deionised formamide, 1% Tween-20, 10% dextran sulphate Mw 500×, 1 mg/ml Torula yeast RNA). Detection was achieved with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (1:500, Roche) and Fast Red TR substrate (Sigma-Aldrich). Negative controls were incubated under the same conditions but with an anti-sense probe or without a probe. Specific strand RT-PCR was used for the detection of natural anti-sense transcripts occurring in the monogenean cells [45 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Genomic TRIM Elements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genomic abundance of TRIM elements was determined by dot-blot analysis. Serial dilutions of genomic DNAs and positive controls (TDR domains derived from TRIM elements of all examined species) were spotted onto positively charged nylon membranes (Roche). As negative controls, we used serial dilutions of unrelated DNA sequence holding just short fragments of similarity to TRIM elements, plasmid DNA without any insert and genomic DNA of the unrelated insect species Tenebrio molitor. The amounts of spotted DNA are given in Supplementary Table S1. Hybridization was performed with a digoxigenin-labeled probe derived from the TRIM elements of all examined species. It was conducted at 65 °C in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 20% SDS, 1 mM EDTA and 0.5% blocking reagent. Post-hybridization washes were performed at 62 °C in 0.1 × SSC, 1% SDS, allowing sequences with >75% of similarity to remain paired. Signals were detected with alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche) using CDP-Star (Roche) as a substrate. Signals were quantified using ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) program.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Whole-mount in situ Hybridization of adar2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) was performed as previously described [45] (link). Embryos were fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde (PFA/PBS, Merck). The embryos were rehydrated and treated with proteinase K for RNA probe penetration. The 1.5-kb sequence for synthesizing adar2 riboprobe, comprising of the RNA binding domains, catalytic domain and 3′-UTR, was amplified by primers AACATGCAGCTGGACCAAACAC and AACAGAGACAAAAAAGGTGTGTGGAG, and cloned to pBlueScriptII. Antisense riboprobe was labeled with digoxigenin (Roche), recognized by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche) and stained with NBT/BCIP (Roche). Zeiss AxioImager.M1 microscope and Zeiss AxioCam HRc camera were used to visualize and captured the images. Multiple images were combined with Adobe Photoshop CS2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Situ Hybridization of Skin Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ISH analysis, skin samples from FVB/NTac mice at 5 days post natum (d p.n.) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS at 4 °C overnight followed by sequential equilibration in sucrose/PBS at 5%, 15%, and 30% sucrose concentrations before cryo-embedding into Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Fisher Scientific, St. Louis, MO) and storage at -80 °C. Probe template specific for Soat1 was generated by using cDNA derived from skin of 5 d p.n. FVB/NTac mice in PCR reactions with the following primer pair: 5’-TGAGAGACTCTGTGCCCCAC (fwd), and 5’-CGAAGAGCACCGGGTAGAAG (rev). PCR products were cloned into pCRII-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY). Hoxc13-specific probe template was generated as described (Tkatchenko et al., 2001 (link)). Synthesis of digoxigenin (DIG) (Roche Life Science, Indianapolis, IN)-labeled antisense and sense (control) RNA probes, hybridization to 10 μm cryo-sections, washing and colorimetric signal detection using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche Life Science) was performed as previously described (Pruett et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Pre-rRNA Levels by Northern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 48 h following the treatment with siRNA, total RNAs were extracted from the cells using TRI REAGENT (Molecular Research Center, Inc.). Purified total RNAs (4 μg) were denatured and separated by 0.8% formaldehyde-agarose gel electrophoresis, and the gel was stained with GelRed Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Biotium, Inc.). The fractionated RNAs were transferred and cross-linked to an Amersham Hybond-N+ membrane (Cytiva), which was used for prehybridization and hybridization with the DIG-labeled 5.8S+ probe (Sirri et al, 2016 (link)) using DIG Easy Hyb buffer (Roche) at 50°C. After washing, the membrane was incubated with the DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set (Roche) and alkaline phosphatase–conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche). Detection of alkaline phosphatase–labeled 47S pre-rRNA was performed using the chemiluminescent substrate CDP-Star (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Situ Hybridization of Mouse Embryonic Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digoxigenin-labelled riboprobes were synthesised with DIG RNA Labelling Mix (ROCHE), Thermo T7 RNA Polymerase (ToYoBo), and gene templates cloned using T7 promoter-containing PCR primer sets (Supplementary Table) and mouse embryonic brain cDNA pools. Fresh-frozen sections of E14.5 mouse embryos were washed twice with PBS-DEPC and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 h at 4 °C. The sections were then serially treated with 6% H2O2 for 20 min, 10 μg/ml proteinase K solution for 5 min, and post-fix solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, and 0.1% Tween in PBS-DEPC) for 20 min at room temperature. After incubation with prehybridisation mix (50% formaldehyde, 5 × SSC pH 5, 150 μg/ml yeast RNA, 150 μg/ml heparin, 1% SDS, and 0.1% Tween) for 30 min at 65 °C, hybridisation was performed overnight with the same solution containing a digoxigenin-labelled riboprobe. Sections were then washed several times with SSC of increasing stringency and subsequently incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche). Nitro blue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (Roche) were used for the colorimetric detection of alkaline phosphatase activity, followed by nuclear staining with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Invitrogen). Both bright-field and nuclear staining images were separately taken using a Keyence BZ-X700 All-in-One microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Satellite DNA Proportions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNAs were digested with HaeIII (Fermentas), HpaII (Fermentas), MspI (Promega), PvuII (New England Biolabs) and TaqI (Roche). Restriction products were resolved by gel electrophoresis, transferred to positively charged nylon membranes (Roche), and hybridized overnight with the DIG-labelled SSUsat probe. To test homology in low, moderate and high stringency conditions, different experimental temperatures (60, 65 and 68 °C) were used. Signals were detected with alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibodies (Roche) using CDP-Star (Roche) as substrate.
The proportions of the satellite present in the genomes of S. subtruncata, S. solida, M. stultorum and D. trunculus were estimated by dot blotting. Serial dilutions of genomic DNAs (10–250 ng) and cloned SSUsat (0.3–10 ng) were dot-blotted onto positively charged nylon membranes (Roche) and hybridized with SSUsat probes. Hybridisation signals were quantified using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!