Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student’s t-tests (unpaired and two-tailed) were used for two-group comparisons (KaleidaGraph Version 4.0, Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Kaleidagraph version 4
Manufactured by Synergy Software
Sourced in United States, Panama
KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data import, manipulation, and visualization. The software supports a variety of data formats and offers a range of graph types for data presentation.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Nano itc, by TA Instruments (2 mentions)
Nanoanalyze, by TA Instruments (2 mentions)
Spss statistics 19, by IBM (1 mentions)
Sas version 9, by SAS Institute (1 mentions)
Fluorescence plate reader instrument, by Tecan (1 mentions)
Optima xl a, by Beckman Coulter (1 mentions)
Acquity uplc h class system, by Waters Corporation (1 mentions)
R software, by R Project for Statistical Computing (1 mentions)
Evos floid cell imaging station, by Thermo Fisher Scientific (1 mentions)
Black 96 well plate, by Corning (1 mentions)
Synergy h1 plate reader, by Agilent Technologies (1 mentions)
Imaging pam, by Walz (1 mentions)
47 protocols using kaleidagraph version 4
1
Quantitative Data Analysis Protocol
2
Clinical Trial Statistical Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The target sample size of 57 (52 eligible patients and 10 % ineligible patients) was based on expected and threshold response rates of 62 and 40 %, respectively, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.1. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Graphs were created using KaleidaGraph version 4.0 (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA), Photoshop CS2 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics 19 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
3
Protein Folding Kinetics Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Folding and unfolding kinetics were followed by recording intrinsic fluorescence changes upon transition at 298 K in a Bio-Logic SFM-3 stopped-flow instrument (Bio-Logic Science Instruments), employing an excitation wavelength of 280 nm and a 320 nm emission cut-off filter. The protein concentration was 20 μM in 50 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.7 with or without urea. All fluorescence traces fitted well to a single exponential function, and kinetic parameters were derived to a two-state folding model, using the Kaleidagraph version 4.0 (Synergy Software), as previously described [18] (link).
4
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as means ± standard error mean. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, PA, USA) as described previously10 (link). Significant differences were accepted at p < 0.05.
5
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparison were made using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between two groups were made using Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Significant differences were assumed at p < 0.05.
6
Comparative Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparison were made using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between two groups were made using Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Differences were assumed as significant at p < 0.05.
7
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s or Dunnett’s test for multiple comparison. Comparisons between two groups were made using Student’s t test. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Significant differences were assumed at p < 0.05.
8
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparison were made using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between two groups were made using a Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Significant differences were assumed at p < 0.05.
9
Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as means ± S.E.M. Each study was repeated at least three times. Differences between groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparisons were made using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between two groups were made using Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Significant differences were assumed at p < 0.05.
10
Pharmacological Effects of Novel Compound
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Results are presented as mean ± standard error. Differences between groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, and corrections for multiple comparisons were made using Dunnett’s test or Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Comparisons between the two groups were made using Student’s t-test. Statistical analyses were performed using the KaleidaGraph version 4.5.1 software (Synergy Software, Reading, PA, USA). Differences were considered to be significant at p < 0.05.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!