The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sigma vp40 field emission scanning electron microscope

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Sigma VP40 is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of a wide range of materials. The Sigma VP40 utilizes a field emission electron source to generate a focused beam of electrons, which is then scanned across the sample surface to produce detailed images. The microscope offers a high resolution of up to 0.8 nm and can operate in both high and low vacuum conditions, allowing for the analysis of a variety of sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using sigma vp40 field emission scanning electron microscope

1

SEM Imaging of Biofilm Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), glass discs were precleaned with acetone, ethanol, and water before sterilization. Biofilms were grown as stated above and rinsed by water before being fixed by 2.5% phosphate‐buffered glutaraldehyde for 30 min at 4 °C as previously described 25. The fixed samples were dehydrated in a graded series of cold ethanol/water mixture (increasing from 10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% to 100% ethanol) for 10 min each. Critical point dryer (Leica EM CPD300; Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) was used to dehydrate the samples after which the samples were coated with a gold/palladium target using a high vacuum sputter coater (Leica ACE600; Leica Microsystems). The biofilm discs were observed with a SIGMA VP40 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc. Oberkochen, Germany) in high vacuum mode at 2 kV. Results presented are representative of at least three independent experiments. Cell diameters in SEM images were measured via imagej (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each condition, a total of 150 cells were measured across three separate experiments. Data presented as mean ± SEM. Distributions were created using bins of 0.2 μm. Coefficient of variance (CV) was calculated using the formula: CV(%)=standard deviation(σ)/mean(μ)100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Burn Eschar

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Both the surface and tissue cross-section of the burn eschar were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To visualize the surface of the wound, seven millimeter biopsy punch samples were fixed with 2.5% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde for at least 24 hours at 4 °C. Fixed specimens were processed through a graded series dehydration using cold ethanol/water (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100%) and an incubation time of 10 minutes followed by critical point drying (EM CPD300, Leica Biosystems Inc. Buffalo Grove, IL). Immediately prior to examination, the wound biopsy punch samples were coated with carbon and gold/palladium (Leica ACE600 Coater). The histological cross-sections were deparaffinized with 100% xylene and air dried prior to coating with carbon and gold/palladium. Both sets of specimens (biopsy punches and tissue cross-sections) were visualized using a Sigma VP40 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc. Germany) in high vacuum mode at 2 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Burn Wound Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For observation of burn wound surface-associated P. aeruginosa biofilms, biopsy tissues were fixed by 2.5% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde for 24 hours at 4°C. The fixed samples were dehydrated in a graded series of cold ethanol/water (increasing from 10, 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95% to 100% ethanol) for 10 minutes each. The samples were dehydrated using a critical point dryer (EM CPD300, Leica Biosystems, Inc.) and coated with carbon and gold/palladium using a Leica ACE600 Coater.
To determine P. aeruginosa tissue penetration, paraffin-embedded histologic sections on microscopy slides were deparaffinized with 100% xylene and allowed to air dry before being coated with carbon and gold/palladium. All samples were observed with a Sigma VP40 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Germany) in high vacuum mode at 2 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MSSA Bacteria Sample Preparation for SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Selected samples of MSSA were collected on 0.22 μM filters immediately after sham or laser exposure. The bacteria on the filters were washed once in PBS and twice in double-distilled H2O, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS, and then dehydrated through a series of increasing alcohol concentrations. After mounting the filters on specimen stubs, samples were coated using a Hummer 6.2 Sputter Coater (Anatech USA, Union City, CA, USA) with a gold–palladium (50%–50%) target and imaged using a Sigma-VP40 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Inc., Jena, Germany) in high vacuum mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms on borosilicate glass disks were fixed by 2.5% phosphate‐buffered glutaraldehyde for 1 hr at 4°C. The fixed biofilms were dehydrated in a graded series of cold ethanol/water mixture (increasing from 10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95% to 100% ethanol) for 6 min each. Critical point dryer EMS 850 (Electron Microscopy Science Hatfield, PA) was used to dehydrate the samples, after which the samples were coated with a gold target using a Hummer 6.2 Sputter Coater (Anatech USA, Hayward, CA). Samples were observed with a Sigma VP40 field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Germany) in high vacuum mode at 2 kV (Van Laar, Chen, You, & Leung, 2015).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!