The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Multimode scanning probe microscope

Manufactured by Veeco
Sourced in United States

The MultiMode Scanning Probe Microscope is a lab equipment product designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of surfaces at the nanoscale level. It utilizes advanced scanning probe techniques to capture detailed topographical and material property information of a wide range of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using multimode scanning probe microscope

1

Atomic Force Microscopy of Nicked DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) samples were prepared in the AFM Buffer consisting of 1 mM Tris and 4 mM MgCl2 (pH = 7.0). Concentrated aliquots of nicked DNA were mixed with AFM buffer to achieve final concentrations of 0.5 ng/μl and 2.2 ng/μl in 20 μl buffer volume. Twenty microlitres drops were then deposited on freshly cleaved mica for 5 min. Afterwards the mica was rinsed with 1 ml of double distilled water and dried under a gentle nitrogen flow.
AFM images were collected using a MultiMode Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM) with a Nanoscope III controller (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) operated in tapping-mode in air. The AFM cantilevers used in air had a spring constant of 5 N/m (Veeco cantilevers, TAP150A) with resonance frequencies ranging between 120 and 160 kHz. All recorded AFM images consisted of 512 × 512 pixels with scan frequency ≤1 Hz. Images were simply flattened using the Gwyddion software (32 ) n (Version 2.25) and no further image processing was carried out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nanovesicle Visualization by TEM and AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of nanovesicles were dropped on a standard carbon-coated cooper transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid and then air-dried at room temperature overnight. TEM images were obtained with a JEM 1011 (Jeol, New York, NY) electron microscope at 80 kV.
Aliquots of nanovesicles diluted in Tris buffer with 10 mM CaCl2 were dropped on mica as the substrate. Vesicles were stood for 15 min to be washed with 1 ml of Milli-Q water. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images were obtained with a Multimode Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco, Santa Barbara, CA) equipped with a Nanoscope V controller operating in tapping mode at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanofibrils Characterization Using AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) using a Veeco MultiMode scanning probe microscope (Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was conducted to confirm the presence of the nanofibrils and analyze their size. Antimony-doped silicon cantilevers (TESPA-V2, Bruker, Camarillo, CA, USA) with a spring constant of 42 Nm−1 and a nominal tip radius of 8 nm were used for the analysis. Samples were prepared by depositing a small droplet of the CNF suspension (0.001 wt%) on a freshly cleaved mica plate and letting it air dry for ≥5 h. The CNF width was measured from the height images to avoid broadening. Approximately 100 fully individualized CNFs from four AFM scans for each sample were analyzed using open-source software Gwyddion 2.61 and presented as the mean with the corresponding standard deviation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of AuNP Assemblies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assembled structures were deposited on freshly cleaned muscovite mica (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for five minutes, then rinsed with MQ-pure water and dried under nitrogen gas. AFM imaging was performed in air in ScanAsyst mode on a Veeco Multimode Scanning Probe Microscope with silicon Scanasyst-air probes (resonant frequency 50–90 kHz, spring constant 0.4 N m−1, and a tip radius of 2 nm).
For TEM imaging, a JEM 2010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL) operated at 200 kV was used. The images were analyzed using a GATAN MSC 794 CCD Camera and GATAN Digital Microscopy software. Five μL AuNP assemblies were transferred to SPI® Supplies Holey carbon coated grids onto 400 mesh copper, incubated for three minutes, washed with 50 μL of MQ-pure water, and dried under nitrogen gas. Samples were then dried completely for at least 15 hours under ambient conditions in a vacuum desiccator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Reduced Graphene Oxide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field-emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) was used to image the dispersion of the rGO by examination of fractured samples of the nanocomposites. A Leo 1525 (Carl Zeiss, Germany) microscope was used, with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. The samples were sputter-coated with a thin film of chromium prior to examination. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was carried out using a 2000FX microscope (JEOL, USA) employing an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Thin slices (about 70 nm in thickness) were cut for TEM using a PowerTome XL ultramicrotome (RMC Products, UK). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was carried out to determine the morphology of the GO using a MultiMode scanning probe microscope (Veeco, UK). The microscope was equipped with a NanoScope IV controller and an E scanner. The concentrated aqueous GO suspension (13 mg/mL) was diluted to 0.1 mg/mL using deionized water. The diluted GO suspension was then dip-coated onto a mica sheet (Agar Scientific, UK) and allowed to dry. Height and phase images were captured by AFM at a resolution of 512 pixels × 512 pixels and a scan speed of 1 Hz, using silicon probes in a tapping mode of operation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Atomic Force Microscopy of GPAT2-Silenced Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements, scr-MDA (control) and sh-MDA (GPAT2 silenced) cells were plated on glass coverslips and grown in routine medium without the addition of AA for 1−2 days until 80% confluent. Then, the cells were fixed using an ethanol dehydration train at room temperature and subsequently air dried [18 (link)]. Fixation is necessary because high-resolution images of cells are poorly achieved in solution, and the enhanced AFM resolution obtained with fixed cells allows a more detailed subcellular analysis [12 (link)].
AFM images were obtained in air, using a MultiMode Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco) equipped with a Nanoscope V controller (Veeco). All measurements were obtained immediately after fixation with Tapping® mode, using probes doped with silicon nitride (RTESP, Veeco with tip nominal radius of 8–12 nm, 271–311 kHz, force constant 20–80 N/m). Typical scan rates were 0.5 Hz.
The analysis was first performed on a large area (50 μm2) with a single cell, and later by heading the cantilever to the cell surface to obtain images of 30 μm2, 15 μm2, and 10 μm2. The same procedure was repeated in six different cells (three cells each time in two independent AFM measurements), with three different AFM acquisition modes: height, phase, and amplitude.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AFM images (5 µm × 5 µm) were obtained with a Veeco Multimode scanning probe microscope equipped with a Nanoscope IV (Veeco Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), a controller operating in tapping mode with a phosphorus doped silicon cantilever (model RTESP). Mean square roughness values were extracted from these images. The surface images were obtained by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a Hitachi SU-8000 instrument (Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Raman spectra were obtained with a Micro-Raman Spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution; Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Surfaces were excited at 785 nm. Optical characterization: both ellipsometric and reflectometric measurements were taken with a GES 5E (SOPRA Company, Courbevoie, France), provided with a variable angle goniometer, Xe-lamp, monochromator and photomultiplier. The reflectance diffuse spectrum was characterized in a Jasco 616 spectrophotometer (Jasco Co., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nanoparticle Characterization by AFM and DLS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solutions of all particles were prepared by suspending the nanoparticles in USP grade sterile water. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) samples were made by drop casting 5 μL of 20 mg/L solution on freshly cleaved mica. AFM was accomplished using a Multimode scanning probe microscope (Veeco) in tapping mode. An ACL probe (AppNano) was utilized at a frequency between 160–225 kHz, an amplitude set point between 1.5–1.8 V, and a drive amplitude between 100–300 mV. The resulting images were processed using Gwyddion (Brno, Czech Republic). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was performed on 1.0 g/L solutions using a Brookhaven Instrument Corporation ZetaPALS. A total of ten runs were averaged using 1.474 as the refractive index.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lipid Bilayer Interactions with Surfactants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ex-situ lipid samples were prepared in freshly cleaved planchets of mica. First, a 5 μL drop of 1 mM CaCl 2 was added to the mica and after 15 min, the surface was washed with MilliQ water. Then, 100 μL of DPPC SUVs were dropped on the Ca 2+ modified mica and allowed to interact for 1 h at 60 °C. The unbounded lipid vesicles were washed with buffer solution. Samples were placed without drying in the AFM fluid chamber, and then filled with 50 µL of HEPES buffer. After scanning the surface, an aliquot (30 µL) of surfactant solution was added and the changes induced by the addition of Bz-Arg-NHC 10 were followed during time (10-20 min). To assess that these observations were not due to invasive AFM tip interaction with the membrane, consecutive scans of the same area without surfactant were also recorded.
AFM measurements were performed on a MultiMode Scanning Probe Microscope controlled by a Nanoscope-V unit (Veeco Instruments Inc., USA) using V-shaped Si 3 N 4 probes (Veeco Instruments Inc., USA) with 0.08-0.15 N m -1 spring constants. All the experiments were carried out at 24 °C in a fluid cell. Images were obtained in contact mode with a scanning rate of 1 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Nanomechanical Characterization of Skin-Mimicking Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM experiments were carried out using a Multimode Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco, Plainview, NY) with a Nanoscope IIIA controller and Nanoscope software (Version 7.341).
For AFM imaging and nanoindentation, film forming solutions with and without MCT were spread uniformly onto glass slides heated to 30°C to mimic the temperature of the skin surface. The films were then maintained at this temperature overnight. The final thickness of the prepared films was ~10 µm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!