The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using mint cdna synthesis kit

1

Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Library Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from each fresh sample was extracted using a CTAB protocol as described by Le Provost et al., [45 (link)] (with minor modifications for a subset of the samples). mRNAs were converted to double stranded cDNA using either SMARTer PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech) or Mint cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
For each species, cDNA libraries from the different organs (leaves, stems and roots) were identified by a specific molecular identifier (MID) tag. Samples from the same organ of different conspecific individuals were pooled for sequencing (MID1 = leaves, MID2 = stems, MID3 = roots). Libraries of the different species were sequenced separately (one run per species) according to a standard Roche-454 protocol [46 (link)]. The raw data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) database (study number: PRJEB3286; http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/) and given the accession numbers ERS177107 through ERS177110.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Normalized cDNA Preparation for 454 Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from each tissue/condition was used as the source of starting material for cDNA synthesis and production of normalized cDNA libraries intended for 454 sequencing. Briefly, the total RNA quality was verified on Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with the RNA 6000 Pico kit (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) and the quantity assessed by fluorimetry with the Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). A fraction of 1–2 μg of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with the MINT cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia), a strategy based on the SMART double-stranded cDNA synthesis methodology using a modified template-switching approach that allows the introduction of known adapter sequences to both ends of the first-strand cDNA. Amplified cDNA was then normalized with TRIMMER cDNA Normalization kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) using the Duplex-Specific Nuclease-technology [20 (link), 29 ].
Normalized cDNA was quantified by fluorescence and sequenced in 454 GS FLX Titanium according to the standard manufacturer’s instructions (Roche-454 Life Sciences, Brandford, CT, USA) at Biocant (Cantanhede, Portugal).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validating Transcriptomic Data by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the transcriptomic data, 10 genes were randomly selected for qRT-PCR analysis. RNA obtained by mixing RNA preparations from two replicates of the same sample in an equal ratio was used for cDNA synthesis with oligo(dT) primer and Mint cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The list of primers used in PCR is shown in Table S1. qRT-PCR was performed using the qPCRmix-HS SYBR+HighROX kit (Eurogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol on a DT-96 Real-Time Instrument (DNA-technology, Moscow, Russia). PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 2 min followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, primer annealing at 59–60 °C for 30 s, and primer extension at 72 °C for 30 s, with the final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The EF1-α (elongation factor 1-alpha) gene of F. ulmaria was used as the internal control (Table S2). Each experiment was run in three technical replicates. The relative abundance of transcripts was estimated using the 2−∆∆CT method [66 (link)]. The PCR amplification specificities of genes were confirmed by sequencing the PCR fragment. The results were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tasmanian Devil RNA Extraction and cDNA Library Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tasmanian devil tissue samples were collected under Animal Ethics permits DPIPWE AEC No. 21/2007-08. Spleen and lymph node RNA was extracted from frozen tissue samples (n = 1 per tissue) using QIAGEN RNeasy Plus Micro Kit. The concentration of extracted RNA was measured on a NanoDrop (spleen 54 ng/ul, A260/A280 2.00; lymph node 32 ng/ul, A260/A280 1.84) and the quality was checked by visualising on a denaturing TAE gel. Double-stranded cDNA libraries were synthesized using Evrogen MINT cDNA synthesis kit, normalised with Evrogen TRIMMER cDNA normalization kit, and amplified using Clontech Advantage 2 PCR kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Assembly and Curation for Macoma Clams

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pooled reads from the M. balthica transcriptome were downloaded from the NCBI SRA database (Accession SRX145744‐6; Pante et al., 2012) and imported into CLC Genomic Workbench 8.0.3 (CLC Bio). We trimmed the raw reads for a maximum of two ambiguous nucleotides, a minimum PHRED score of 20, and a minimum length of 50 bp. Additionally, we trimmed out short population‐specific 5′ repeats and adapters from the original MINT cDNA Synthesis Kit (Evrogen) used to make the cDNA library.
Trimmed reads were assembled in CLC 8.0.3 with default settings, and were remapped with a length fraction of 0.5 and a similarity fraction of 0.8 as these criteria yielded the most contigs with two or more contributing reads. We used less stringent parameters than Pante et al. (2012) in creating the transcriptome reference to avoid excluding informative SNPs due to genetic differences between M. balthica and M. petalum. We kept contigs with a minimum of two contributing reads and retained high‐quality singletons.
We filtered out duplicate contigs in CLC 8.0.3 by performing a BLASTn search of the transcriptome assembly against itself. Sequences were discarded if they were a perfect match to another, longer sequence. We retained only representative contigs and singletons to create a partial reference transcriptome for analysis of Illumina reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Extraction and RACE Cloning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from blood cells of S. rustica using TRI Reagent (Sigma) and reverse-transcribed with MINT cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MINT RACE cDNA Amplification Set (Evrogen) was used for 3′ and 5’ RACE. For 3’RACE, nested degenerate oligonucleotide primers were designed using the iCODEHOP algorithm [64 (link)] on the basis of the determined amino acid sequence (Table 3; #1, 2). Primers for 5′RACE (Table 3; #3, 4) were based on the DNA sequence obtained in 3’RACE. Both 3′ and 5’PCR products were cloned in pAL2-T vector, using Quick-TA kit (Evrogen, Russia), and Sanger sequenced in Evrogen.

Oligonucleotide primers used in the study

PrimerSequence 5′-3′
1Sr_P26_3’_F1ggnaaywsntayathmng
2Sr_P26_3’_F2tasttayattcgttgt
3Sr_P26_5’_R1cattgtgccaagttcccgag
4Sr_P26_5’_R2ccgagcaatggttgctgttta

h = a,c,t; y = c,t; s = c,g; n = a,g,c,t; m = a,c; w = a,t. Bold letters with underscore – overlaying parts of nested primers

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction and Sequencing of Root Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from root samples using the hot borate method [90 (link)]. Equal amount of root tissue from susceptible genotypes was combined as one susceptible control for RNA extraction, whereas root tissue from infested samples was equally combined for RNA preparation. After mRNA purification using GenElute mRNA miniprep kit (Sigma), six cDNA libraries were constructed using Mint cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen). They are DP90 and SG747 uninfested cDNA library (DSU), DP90 and SG747 infested cDNA library (DSI), LONREN-1 uninfested cDNA library (L1U), LONREN-1 infested cDNA library (L1I), BARBREN-713 uninfested cDNA library (B713U), and BARBREN-713 infested cDNA library (B713I) (S1 Fig). The constructed libraries were sequenced on illumina 2000 HiSeq sequencer at the Genomics Core Facility at Emory University. Raw sequencing data is available for download at NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject: PRJNA275155 (BioSamples: SAMN03381308; SAMN03381306; SAMN03381268; SAMN03381265; SAMN03381261; and SAMN03339739).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

5′-RACE to Amplify mRNA Sequences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5′-RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA 5′-end) is a method that allows amplification of an unknown sequence on the 5′-end of a specific mRNA, using a primer designed to anneal to a known mRNA part and a universal adaptor primer. RNA extracted from the CNS of a single naive snail was used in this experiment. We used the SMART approach [48 (link),49 (link)] to prepare first-strand cDNA and anchor it with the adaptor sequence in a single step. cDNA synthesis was followed by Step-Out RACE procedure (a specific variant of nested PCR) [50 (link)] to amplify the 5′-end of the sequence. Reverse transcription paired with flanking of cDNA with adaptor sequences was performed with Mint cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. cDNA was pre-amplified with a single adaptor-specific primer according to Evrogen’s protocol before being used as a template for nested PCR. Three rounds of nested PCR were performed with Mint RACE primer set and Encyclo polymerase mix (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) using PCR programs recommended by Evrogen. Primer annealing temperature was 62 °C in every reaction. PCR products were visualized using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Generating cDNA Expression Library from Xenopus Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
cDNA expression library was prepared by the SMART approach from total embryonic RNA with a Mint cDNA synthesis kit (Evrogen, Russia). cDNA gene fragments were isolated from the library by PCR with gene-specific primers (see Table 1). Primers were designed based upon sequences obtained from the sequenced transcriptome (Illumina) of D. pumila35 (link). Amplified fragments were cloned into the pAL-TA vector (Evrogen, Russia). Digoxygenine‐labeled antisense RNA probes were generated from gene fragments, which were amplified from plasmids with D. pumila genes.

PCR and qPCR primers used in this study.

GeneDirect primer 5' ‑> 3'Reverse primer 5' ‑> 3'
DpBra1 in situ probeTTGGTGGCGACAGCGAAGAACGGCCACGTGTTGTTTTGAATG
DpBra2 in situ probeGAACGGAGAGGGCAAAGACAAACGACGGCGAATATGGGGAACAAAT
DpBra3 in situ probeAATAATTCTTCACCGTCCAACAGGCGCGCTTTTCGTGATAGATAGG

XlTubb2b.S (β-tubulin)

qPCR

GATCCTACCGGCAGTTACCATGACAGAGTCCATTGTGCCT
XlActc1.L (cardiac actin) qPCRCTATGTGGCTTTGGACTTTGAGGCTGTTGTAGGTAGTTTCATG GA
XlMyod1.S qPCRAGTGACAGCCCAAATGACTCAGAAGGGATGGTGATTACTCTC
XlEF1a qPCRCCCTGCTGGAAGCTCTTGACGGACACCAGTCTCCACACGA
XlODC qPCRGGGCTGGATCGTATCGTAGATGCCAGTGTGGTCTTGACAT
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!