The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using ultracut em uc7 ultramicrotome

1

Ultramicroscopic Analysis of ECIV Virus Propagation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ECIV isolate was propagated in a 75 cm2 flask of EPC cells until CPE was observed. The supernatant from the infected flask was discarded, and the monolayer was fixed in 15 mL of modified Karnovsky’s fixative (2P + 2G, 2% formaldehyde prepared from paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4) at room temperature for 1 h. The monolayer was then washed in cacodylate buffer, scraped off the flask, and pelleted. The pellet was shipped via PBS overnight on ice packs to the University of Texas Medical Branch Department of Pathology Electron Microscopy Laboratory (UTMB-EML). At UTMB-EML, the cell pellet was washed in cacodylate buffer and left in 2P + 2G fixative overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the cell pellet was washed twice in cacodylate buffer, post-fixed in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer pH 7.4, en bloc stained with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate, dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol, processed through propylene oxide, and embedded in Poly/Bed 812 epoxy plastic (Polysciences, Warrington, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections were cut on a Leica ULTRACUT EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA), stained with 0.4% lead citrate, and examined in a JEM-1400 electron microscope (JEOL USA) at 80 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Cells and Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) and loaded on carbon Formvar-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), which were subsequently stained with uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). In the case of cells, they were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), post-fixed for 1 h in 2% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanols (Pharmco-Aaper, Brookfield, CT, USA), and embedded in EM-bed (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). The glass coverslip was dissolved in hydrofluoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA). Then, 100 nm sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). The grids were viewed at 80 kV in a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA) and images captured by an AMT BioSprint 12 (AMT Imaging Systems, Woburn, MA, USA) digital camera
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Electron Microscopy of Adherent and Suspension CTC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CM61 CTCs were grown in either low attachment or adherent conditions. Adherent cells were grown on cover-slips while suspension cells were pelleted and fixed. They were both fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, post-fixed for 1 h in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanols, and embedded in EM-bed (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA, USA). The glass cover-slip was dissolved in hydrofluoric acid. Then, 100 nm sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome (Wetzlar, Germany) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were viewed at 80 kV in a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) and images were captured by an AMT BioSprint 12 digital camera (Woburn, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extracellular Vesicle Transmission Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde and loaded on carbon Formvar-coated copper grids, which were subsequently stained with uranyl acetate. The EVs were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, post-fixed for 1 h in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanols, and embedded in EM-bed (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington PA). The glass coverslip was dissolved in hydrofluoric acid. 100 nm sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were viewed at 80 kV in a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope and images captured using an AMT BioSprint 12 digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mitochondria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, before being incubated for 1 h in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol concentrations, and embedded in EM-bed (Electron Microscopy Sciences). The glass coverslips were removed by treatment with hydrofluoric acid. Next, 100 nm sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were viewed at 80 kV in a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope and images were captured by an AMT BioSprint digital camera. For quantitative analysis, fields were chosen at random, and acquisition and quantification were performed using FIJI (NIH) and GraphPad Prism 9.3.1 software, respectively. Morphometric analyses of the mitochondria and substructures were performed by three investigators in a randomized, double-blind manner, which included taking the images, quantifying the data, and running the statistics separately. Images were obtained at random from three independent experiments[29 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Salt-Stressed Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM analyses were performed on plants collected at 23 d after sowing (DAS), which were grown in vitro on 1/2MS solid medium supplemented with 0 or 100 mM NaCl. Entire plants were fixed by incubating them O/N at 4°C in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde plus 2% paraformaldehyde (v/v) in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. The samples were post-fixed with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C. After three washes in water, the samples were dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in Epon resin (Sigma). Ultrafine sections (60–80 nm) of roots were obtained with a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome, subsequently contrasted with 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate and 1% (w/v) lead citrate and visualized with a Tecnai G2 (FEI) transmission electron microscope operating at 100 kV. Images were captured with Velta (Olympus Soft Imaging System, Tokyo, Japan) digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Analyzing Pam. experimentalis thermal responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Active or tun-state Pam. experimentalis (n = 15 for each condition) were subjected to 20 °C, 35 °C, 37 °C, 40 °C, or 42 °C for 5 h. Then, the material was fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, and embedded according to the protocol described by Janelt et al.61 (link). Semi-thin (800 nm) and ultra-thin (70 nm) sections were cut using a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome. Semi-thin sections were stained with 1% methylene blue in 1% borax and analyzed using an Olympus BX60 light microscope. Ultra-thin sections were mounted on copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Material was examined using a Hitachi H500 transmission electron microscope at 75 kV or a Hitachi UHR FE-SEM SU 8010 scanning electron microscope equipped with an ET (Everhart–Thornley) detector for imaging the sections at a low voltage of 25 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exosome Ultrastructural Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde and loaded on carbon formvar-coated copper grids, which were subsequently stained with uranyl acetate. The exosomes were fixed overnight in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, post-fixed for 1 hour in 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol, and embedded in EM-bed (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington PA). The glass coverslip was dissolved in hydrofluoric acid. 100 nm sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut EM UC7 ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The grids were viewed at 80 kV in a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope and images were captured using an AMT BioSprint 12 digital camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!