The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Light microscopy

Manufactured by Optika
Sourced in Italy

Light microscopy is an optical microscopy technique that uses visible light and a system of lenses to magnify and observe small objects. It allows for the examination and analysis of a wide range of samples, from biological specimens to materials science samples. The core function of light microscopy is to provide a detailed view of the internal structure and properties of these samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using light microscopy

1

Alizarin Red S Staining of Mineral Deposits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-differentiated and differentiated cells were cultured on 12-well plates. After 15 days of incubation, the cells were washed with DPBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (EMS, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 30 min, in the dark, at room temperature. Fixed cells were washed twice with DPBS, and mineral deposits were stained with 2% Alizarin Red S (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 3 min. After staining, cells were washed twice with water and analyzed by light microscopy (Optika, Ponteranica, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hematological and Biochemical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples taken in EDTA tubes were used for hematological treatment using an automated hematology analyzer (ABX Pentra XL 80, France). The differential count of leukocytes was performed with light microscopy (Optika, Italy) after haematological staining (fixation with May Grunewald and staining with Giemsa stain (Atom Scientific, UK). In each case, 100 cells were counted. Blood samples taken in anticoagulant-free tubes were used for biochemical analysis and were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The sera were separated, stored at -20 °C and used for evaluation. Biochemical parameters were estimated using URIT 8021A automated analyzer (URIT Medical Electronic Group Co., Ltd.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Osteogenic Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human commercial cell line, DPSCs (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) was used. For all studies examining the molecular mechanism of osteogenic differentiation, cells were seeded in 25 cm2 flasks and grown under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells were precultured in DPSCs growth medium consisted of α-MEM (Merck Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 2 mM GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.2 mM ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% fetal bovine serum (Biosera, Nuaille, France), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Biosera). The medium was replaced every three days. During preculture, cells remained in an undifferentiated stage. After reaching 80–90% confluence, cells were harvested using TrypLE Express Enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then seeded at 5000 cells/cm2. When DPSCs reached 50% confluence (day 0), the growth medium was replaced with osteoinductive medium OsteoMAX-XF (Merck Sigma-Aldrich) for osteogenic differentiation and mineralization. The cells were grown in this specific medium for 24 days. In parallel, undifferentiated DPSCs (control) were cultured in the DPSCs growth medium. Media were changed every 3 days. Cell morphology was monitored during the experiment by light microscopy (Optika, Via Rigla, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimizing DPSC Osteogenic Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We investigated the differentiation potential of DPSCs towards osteogenic lineages using various osteogenic differentiation media in order to optimize their therapeutic use. We used three different types of osteogenic differentiation media from various companies: StemPro® Osteogenesis Differentiation Kit (Thermo Fischer, Waltham, MA, USA), Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteogenic Differentiation Medium (PromoCell, Heilderberg, Germany) and OsteoMAX-XFTM Differentiation Medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs was induced with commercial osteogenic medium (the protocol of each producer was followed). Non-differentiated DPSCs cells (control) were cultured in basic growth medium along with differentiated cells. The osteogenic medium was changed every three days. Cell morphology was monitored by light microscopy (Optika, Ponteranica, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!