The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using simca p v13

1

Multivariate Analysis of Metabolomics Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SIMCA P+ v13.0 (UMETRICS) and R (R-Project for Statistical Computing, CRAN.R-project.org). PCA was performed on all samples together as well as individual analyses for each class. This separate analysis was used to remove any outlying samples that were not highly similar to the remaining members of that class. Only a single sample was removed by this process, for details see the supplementary material. After this trimming process PCA and OPLS-DA was performed on the entire dataset. OPLS-DA models were then generated for each combination of control and treated samples (e.g., Bp control and Bp Al exposed, Sc control spent media and Sc Cu exposed spent media etc.) in order to minimize the amount of variation being examined in any one model, thereby maximizing the interpretability of each model. For each of these pairwise OPLS-DA models the R2Y, Q2 and CV-ANOVA p values were used to assess model quality; only models with CV-ANOVA p values below 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. From each significant model the VIP and p(corr) values were exported for further interpretation. Shared and unique structures plots were used as this type of plot simplifies analysis of metabolomics data while maintaining the depth of complexity within the dataset (Wiklund et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fecal Metabolome Analysis via GC-TOF-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fecal samples were lyophilized, derivatized and analyzed by gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) (Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph and LECO Pegasus III time-of-flight mass spectrometer) as previously described [23 (link),24 (link)]. MS-DIAL software [25 (link)] and FiehnBin base database were used for raw peaks exacting, the data baselines filtering, and calibration of the baseline [26 (link)]. Peaks detected in ≤50% of QC samples or <50% samples of every group were removed, except QC group or RSD>30% in QC samples [27 (link)]. SIMCA-P v13.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) was used for partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The first principal component of variable in importance projection (VIP) was obtained to refine the analysis. VIP > 1.5 was first selected as “changed metabolites”. Obtained metabolites were validated by searching in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Saliva Protein Profiling of Gender Differences

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between males and females in the study were tested with Mann-Whitney U-test using Statistica (StatSoft, Oklahoma, USA) since most of these variables did not show normal distribution. Repeated measurement analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyses differences in saliva collection with Bonferroni test as post hoc test when the ANOVA indicated significant differences.
Correlations between variables were tested for Statistical significance with Spearman correlation test, adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Bonferroni. Descriptive data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). For all analyses, the significance level was set at P < 0.05.
When investigating the multivariate correlations between the proteins and group membership. Orthogonal Partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was applied using SIMCA-P+ v.13.0 (UMETRICS, Umeå, Sweden)8 (link)32 33 (link). Principal component analysis (PCA), also available in SIMCA-P+ was used to identify multivariate outliers. No multivariate outliers were identified. The variable influence on projection (VIP) indicates the relevance of each X-variable pooled over all dimensions and the Y-variables – the group of variables that best explains Y. VIP > 1.2 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolomics Biomarker Identification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw MS spectra were firstly converted to common data format (.mzData) by Mass Hunter Qualitative Analysis software (Agilent technologies, USA). Then peak alignment was carried out by XCMS program. Subsequently an integrated data matrix composed of compound mass, retention time, and peak intensities was generated. After normalization, the obtained data sets were imported into SIMCA-P V13.0 (Umetrics AB, Sweden) to perform PCA and PLS-DA. In order to avoid over fitting, PLS-DA models were validated by permutation test (with 200 permutations). The parameters of the PLS-DA models including R2X, R2Y, and Q2Y were analyzed to ensure the model quality, and the R2Y-, Q2Y-intercepts of permutation test were examined and to avoid the risk of over-fitting. VIP values and loading-plots were applied to find potential biomarkers. A Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test with false discovery rate (FDR) limit equal to 0.05 was employed for univariate analysis. With VIP value above 1.0 and adjusted P value below 0.05, the candidate metabolites were considered to be potential biomarkers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multivariate Analysis of LC-MS Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the normalization of the total peak intensity, SIMCA-P V13.0 (Umetrics, Sweden) was then introduced for further analysis of the data. PCA, PLS-DA, and orthogonal PLS-DA (OPLS-DA) were undertaken for both positive and negative model construction after log transformation and Pareto scaling. In the PCA, all QC samples were well assembled, confirming the stability of LC-MS. The variable importance in the projection (VIP) value of each variate in the PLS-DA model was calculated so as to indicate the modeling importance of every variate and meanwhile their influence on the response variables [23 (link)]. The predictive ability of the developed model was evaluated using a permutation test. To ensure the stability of the probability estimates, 20 permutations were carried out. In SIMCA P+, VIP plots are sorted based on the importance of variables. Variables with VIP of > 1 are usually considered the most important for explaining Y-variables. To obtain metabolites that were highly associated with PMI, the metabolites were screened with a threshold of VIP score >1.5. Metabolites with VIP values of >1.5 were analyzed by Student’s t-test at the univariate level, and those with p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Differential Metabolite Analysis in Deepwater Rice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify differentially accumulated metabolites between deepwater- (C9285 or NIL-12) and non-deepwater rice T65 or among time points, we calculated log2-mean expression fold-change of each metabolite in C9285 (or NIL-12) compared to T65. We utilized the R package LIMMA [74 (link),75 ] with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple testing [76 (link)]. PCA was applied for the metabolite data matrix (log10-transformed) with autoscaling using SIMCA-P + (v 13.0, Umetrics, Sweden) software. HCA and visualization of the metabolite levels (log2 ratio) were performed in R (https://cran.r-project.org/) and the hetmaply package [77 (link)]. Euclidean distances in stats::dist() and the complete linkage method in stats::hclust() were used for HCA. For the short-term experiment, we analyzed plant samples on two different days and normalized them with the COMBAT algorithm [78 (link)] to remove potential batch effects. In the long-term experiment, we combined and summarized metabolome and phytohormonome data obtained from different platforms using the MetMask tool [47 (link)]. VENNY (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html) was used to create the Venn diagram.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metabolomic Profiling of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acquired raw data from the LC–MS were introduced to the Compound Discoverer 2.0 (Thermo Fisher, United States) for peak alignment and detection. The primary parameters were: mass range, 100–1,500 Da; mass tolerance, 5 ppm; S/N threshold, 3; assignment threshold, 70. The peak area was normalized in Excel 2007. The obtained NMR spectra were introduced to MestReNova (version 8.0.1, Mestrelab Research, Santiago de Compostela, Spain) for phasing and correcting the baseline manually, and for referencing to the chemical shift of creatinine (3.04 ppm). Regions at δ 0.0–9.00 ppm were segmented at δ 0.01 intervals. Regions containing resonance from residual water (δ 4.50–5.00 ppm) were cut. The integral areas were then normalized to the total sum of spectra, to reduce the significant concentration differences.
The acquired data was imported into SIMCA-P V13.0 (Umetrics, Sweden) for multivariate statistical analysis. The different biological metabolites were selected based on VIP-value of S-plot (>1) and T-test (p < 0.05). The selected metabolites of the LC–MS analysis were identified according to the online databases: Metlin1, HMDB2, Massbank3, Pubchem4, Lipid Maps5 and KEGG6. The metabolites obtained from NMR analysis were identified based on moieties and chemical shifts. Pathway analysis was conducted with MetaboAnalyst7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Physicochemical Analysis of Heart Failure Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to investigate whether active anti-heart failure components in SND and anti-heart failure drugs had similar physicochemical properties, the physicochemical properties of 48 active components and 71 drugs collected in drugbank using the keywords “heart failure” were calculated using commercial software Discovery Studio 2.5 (http://www.accelrys.com). The properties included molecular weight, the number of aromatic rings, the number of hydrogen bond donors, the molecular polar surface area, the number of rotatable bonds, ALogP, the number of hydrogen bond acceptors. Distribution of these compounds in the chemical space was visualized via principal component analysis using SIMCA-P V 13.0 (demo, Umetrics, Sweden). In addition, as physicochemical characteristics of a compound are also important for its drug likeness. Comparing the physicochemical characteristics of active components in SND with FDA-approved oral drugs will provide insight into the drug likeness of these ingredients. We collected 105 approved oral drugs from drugbank, and the same seven properties were calculated in the same way as above descriptions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lipidomic Analysis of Algal Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global lipidomic analyses were undertaken on a Thermo Exactive Orbitrap platform over m/z 200–2000 in positive and negative ion modes. The mass spectrometer was interfaced to a Thermo Accela 1250 UHPLC system (Hemel Hempstead, UK). Algal lipid extracts were loaded on to a Thermo Hypersil Gold C18 column (1.9 µm; 2.1 mm × 50 mm) over a 21 min gradient starting at 65% Buffer A (10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) and 35% Buffer B (90:10 isopropanol/acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid) increasing to 100% of Buffer B. Progenesis QI (Nonlinear Dynamics) was used to process the datasets. Lipids were identified through interrogation of HMDB (http://www.hmdb.ca/), LIPID MAPS (www.lipidmaps.org/) and a locally generated algal lipid database. Multivariate statistical analysis was performed using SIMCA-P v13.0 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden). The processed data were transformed using variance stabilisation and the mean abundance within experimental conditions was determined. Lipids were deemed to be altered in abundance following a two-way ANOVA analysis with fold-change differences between groups determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multivariate analysis of NMR spectra

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A statistical analysis of the data was conducted using the SPSS software with a confidence level of 95%. Origin 2021 was used for data plotting. All spectra were corrected for phase and baseline using the Mestre Nova 14.2.0 software, with chemical shifts referenced to the methyl signal of TSP (δH 0.00). The spectral region between δH 1.5 and δH 5.5 was divided into bins with a width of 0.002 ppm. The integrated areas of all bins were then normalized to the dry sample weights. Multivariate data analysis was conducted on the normalized data using the software SIMCA-P+ (V13.0, Umetrics, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!