The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

May grunwald

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The May-Grunwald is a laboratory equipment product used for the staining and differentiation of blood cells. It is a solution that contains a mixture of eosin and methylene blue, which are used to stain cellular components, allowing for the identification and analysis of different types of blood cells under a microscope. The May-Grunwald stain is commonly used in hematology laboratories for the preparation and examination of blood smears.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using may grunwald

1

May-Grunwald-Giemsa Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
May‐GrunwaldGiemsa staining was performed following the published protocols.41 Briefly, cells were first smeared onto glass slides, air‐dried, fixed in 100% Methanol for 3‐10 minutes and then went through 2‐step staining: first with 50% (v/v) May‐Grunwald (Sigma, CAS NO. 63590) in phosphate‐buffered saline (pH 6.8) for 3‐5 minutes, then with 10% Giemsa (Sigma, CAS NO. 48900) for 10‐30 minutes and washed with running water for 1‐3 minutes. Images of air‐dried slides were taken under a Leica microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Epithelial Wound Healing Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At day 6 or 10 after transplantation, the wound tissue was excised and fixed in a mixture of 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde. Epithelial wound healing was estimated macroscopically by measuring the open wound areas. To easily recognize the edge of the regenerating epithelium, we poured a mixed solution of 10% May-Grunwald and 10% Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) on the wounds, as reported previously [10 (link)]. Photo pictures of each stained sample were analyzed using image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and the area inside the outline of regenerating epithelial edge was defined as the open wound area. The wound closure rate was calculated from the relative ratio of the epithelialized area (the original wound area subtracted by the open wound area) to the original wound area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cytospin and Staining for Iron Accumulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytospin slides with 15,000 BM cells were stained with May -Gr€ unwald (Merck) for 5 min and counterstained with 3% Giemsa (Merck) for 15 min. For analysis of iron accumulations slides were stained with potassium ferrocyanide (20%) and hydrochloric acid (10%) at a 1:1 ratio for 20 min, and counterstained with eosin (0.2%) for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

13C-Metabolic Labeling and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
13C-metabolic labeling was performed following published methods (47 (link)). Kelly were plated at 5 × 105/well in 6-well plates in RPMI/10% FBS overnight before medium was changed to MEM (Sigma-Aldrich #51416C) containing 10% FBS, NEAA, 2g/L glucose and 2mM 50% 13C-uniformly labeled glutamine. For 13C glucose labeling, the same medium was used except that the glucose component was 50% 13C-uniformly labeled glucose (Sigma-Aldrich) and glutamine was unlabelled (2mM). Inhibitor or vehicle was added to cells for 6h or 24h before harvesting for media and polar metabolite fractions (47 (link)). GC-MS metabolomic analyses were performed as published (48 (link)) on polar metabolite or media fractions. Media was also analysed for glucose and lactate using a YSI model 7100 enzyme analyzer.
For real-time metabolic analyses, 80,000 Kelly cells were plated in wells of a XF24 plate (Seahorse Bioscience), and next day media was replaced with base media containing 2g/L glucose and 200 mM glutamine and analysed on a Seahorse XF24-3 Bioanalyser. After determination of baseline ECAR and OCR, 1μM of SR13800 or vehicle was injected onto cells. Results were normalized by cell count in five fields of methanol-fixed cells stained with May-Grunwald (Sigma-Aldrich) and Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cell Differential Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected and spun onto glass slides using cytospin, and stained by May-Grunwald (Sigma) solution for 5 min, and immediately transferred to 10% Giemsa solution (freshly prepared) for 10 min, finally rinsed gently with deionized water twice, dried, sealed with gum. The slides were examined and photographs were taken under an optical microscope. The pictures were analyzed by Image-Pro, and the cells at different differentiation stages were distinguished according to the cell size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methanol, glacial acetic acid, microscope slides, sodium citrate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride (0.05 M KCl), Giesma stain, May-Grunwald, and heparin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). DCFH-DA (2’, 7-dichlorofluorescin diacetate) assay kit was obtained from Molecular Probes, Inc. USA. Comet assay kit was purchased from Trevigen, Inc. (Gaithersburg MD, USA. All reagents were of analytical grade or highest grade available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Staining and Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2.5x104 cells were resuspended in 150μL PBS and, through centrifugation at 60xg for 5 minutes, were spun onto a microscope glass slide and left to air dry. Cells were fixed by incubation in methanol for 10 minutes followed by May-Grunwald (Sigma; diluted 1:1 with Sorenson’s Buffer (33.3mM KH2PO4, 64.75mM Na2HPO4, pH6.8)) staining for 20 minutes and subsequent staining with Giemsa (Sigma; 10x diluted with Sorenson’s Buffer) for 30 minutes. Finally, stained cells were washed under running tap water and left in Sorenson’s buffer for five minutes prior to one final wash with tap water. Slides were left to air dry before cells were permanently mounted with a coverslip and DPX neutral mounting media (VWR, Radnor, PA). Images were obtained using a Leica SCN400 histology scanner (Leica, Solms, Germany) and analyzed using SlidePath Gateway software v1.0 (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibody-based Characterization of Macrophage Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-mouse F4/80 Ab (Cl:A3-1) and anti-TGF-β (AHP1734) was purchased from Serotec (Raleigh, NC). Anti-p50 (ab7971), anti-p65/RelA (ab7970), anti-iNOS (ab3523), and anti- TNF-α (ab 6671) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, Massachusetts). F4/80-FITC-conjugate (BM8), CD36-PE-conjugate (No.72-1) were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, California). Anti- IL-1β Ab (AF-401-NA), recombinant mouse (rm) GM-CSF (rm GM-CSF), rm IL-4, and Duoset TNF-α ELISA kit were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Anti-phospho p65/RelA (3033) was purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). Anti-Arg1 (sc-18354) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Dallas, TX). Vectastain ABC kit for immunohistochemistry and Vectashield mounting medium was purchased from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). May-Grunwald and Wright-Giemsa stains were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Missouri). Filters (0.45-μm pore size, mixed cellulose ester) were acquired from Millipore (Billerica, MA) and PDMS from Invotec International (Jacksonville, FL). PDMS disks (4 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) were cut with the aid of a biopsy punch (Acuderm; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Mononuclear Cell Staining Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FL and BM mononuclear cells were stained with Wright-Giemsa and May-Grunwald stains (Sigma-Aldrich), and images were photographed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Macrophage Analysis from GFP-Positive Hemocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of macrophages was done on of sorted cells from GFP-positive hemocytes population, using HmlΔ>eGFP. One thousand cells were sorted directly in fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and centrifuged for 10 min at 800g with a low acceleration onto Superfrost slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After air drying for at least 30 min, the slides were fixed in methanol, air dried for at least 30 min, stained with May-Grunwald (Sigma-Aldrich) solution for 5 to 15 min and then Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich) solution 14% for 15 to 30 min, and rinsed with Sorenson buffer (pH 6.8). After air drying, the slides were mounted with Entellan (Merck). Pictures were taken using an Axio Lab.A1 Zeiss microscope with N-Achroplan 100×/01.25 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!