The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ventana benchmark xt immunostainer

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

The Ventana Benchmark XT Immunostainer is a fully automated slide staining system designed for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) assays. It is capable of performing various staining procedures, including deparaffinization, antigen retrieval, and application of primary antibodies, detection reagents, and chromogens. The Ventana Benchmark XT Immunostainer is intended to provide consistent and reliable staining results for diagnostic and research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using ventana benchmark xt immunostainer

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of SRC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SRC status was assessed using paraffin-embedded tissue samples, which were cut into slices of 2μm. Using the monoclonal rabbit antibody anti-SRC (36D10) Rabbit mAb (Cell Signal, Boston, MA, 1:2000 diluted), a standardized immunohistochemical staining technique was performed on a Ventana Bench-Mark XT immunostainer (Ventana, Tucson, AZ). The heat epitope retrieval was performed for 60 minutes at 100°C (pH=9). The anti-SRC antibody was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The enzymatic reactivity was visualized by means of horseradish peroxidase using the ultraView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems).
As SRC is localized in the cytosol as well as in the membrane, both staining localizations were analyzed. For cytoplasmic staining, four different staining intensity grades were defined: 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (strong staining), 3 (very strong staining). For membrane staining, another four grades were defined: 3 (differentiation of membrane staining at low magnification (5x) was possible), 2 (differentiation of membrane staining at medium magnification (20x) was possible), 1 (differentiation of membrane staining at high magnification (40x) was possible), 0 (even at highest magnification (40x) no differentiation of membrane staining was possible).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer's Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The neuropathological reports and slides were re-examined to determine potential AD pathology. The material included H&E and Bielschowsky silver stainings in sections from a minimum of 12 brain regions. Immunohistochemical stainings for Aβ, phospho-tau, α-synuclein, TDP-43, and p62 were performed using a Ventana Benchmark XT Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ). The used antibodies, clones and manufacturers are listed in Table 1. Scoring of AD changes was carried out according to NIA-AA guidelines for neuropathological assessment of AD using the ABC principle [22 (link)] with minor modifications, except for one case (#6, Table 2) for whom only the neuropathologist’s report was available. The A stands for Aβ plaque Thal phase [23 (link)], B for neurofibrillary stage by phospho-tau staining according to Braak [24 (link)], and C for neuritic plaque scoring modified from CERAD [25 (link)]. The Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD) and FTLD+ motor neuron disease (MND) were used as proposed by the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar degeneration [26 (link)]. Lewy body disease (LBD) was diagnosed according to guidelines of the DLB Consortium [27, 28 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of p16 and BRAF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed on FFPE sections using antibodies directed against p16INK4a (mouse monoclonal anti‐p16, clone E6H4, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and BRAF V600E (mouse monoclonal anti‐BRAF V600E, clone VE1, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using a Ventana Benchmark XT Immunostainer (Roche Ventana, Darmstadt, Germany). Immunohistochemistry for phospho‐ERK was studied as described before (32); a detailed method is provided in the supplementary methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Standardized Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standardized immunohistochemical staining was performed in a Ventana BenchMark XT Immunostainer (Ventana, Ventana Medical Systems, Mannheim, Germany). Using the immunostainer, the heat epitope retrieval was automatically performed on tissue sections in CC1 (Cell Conditioning 1 solution, Ventana Medical Systems, Mannheim, Germany) buffer for 60 min at 100°C. Subsequently, the tissue sections were automatically incubated with the PATHWAY anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) rabbit monoclonal antibody at 37°C for 32 min. Then the sections were decorated with secondary antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase and stained with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (ultraView Universal DAB Detection Kit; Ventana Medical Systems, Mannheim, Germany). As counterstain, the Hematoxylin II counterstain reagent (Ventana Medical Systems, Mannheim, Germany) was used to stain nuclei. Finally, the object slides were manually dehydrated in a series of ascending alcoholic concentrations (2×1 min 75% EtOH, 2×1 min 96% EtOH, 2×1 min 100% EtOH) with a final 2 min incubation in Xylol. The slides were mounted in Vitro-Clud (Langenbrinck, Labor- und Medizintechnik, Emmending, Germany). This method was used for Figure 3B,D,H.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on 5-μm-thick unstained sections from tissue microarray blocks using antibodies to cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (clone OV-TL12/30; Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA; 1:300 dilution), to cytokeratin 20 (CK20) (clone Ks20.8; Dako; 1:200 dilution), to homeobox protein CDX2 (clone CDX2-88; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1:100 dilution), and to epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) (clone 3C6; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; 1:100 dilution). IHC staining of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was performed using the Ventana Ultra View DAB detection kit (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) and the Ventana PATHWAY HER2/neu rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) on a Ventana BenchMark XT immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems). All slides from each tumor were evaluated by a single pathologist independently based on the following criteria. Expression of CK7, CK20, and CDX2 was considered positive if 10% of the tumor cells showed immunoreactivity. For EGFR, both the percentage of positive tumor cells and the intensity of positive staining were graded according to a previous report [23 (link)]. Total grades were generated on a scale of 0–6 and considered positive if the score was 2–6. The staining for HER2 was graded according to the guidelines for such testing in gastric cancers [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Detection of p16

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Deparaffinized sections were incubated with mouse anti-human p16 antibody (Clone E6H4) using the Ventana CINtext kit (Ventana Medical Systems, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP)-DAB staining was subsequently performed on the Ventana Benchmark XT Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, USA) using the Ventana Optiview Amplification Kit (Ventana Medical Systems, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Glioblastoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological criteria for diagnosing GBM were the appearance of a malignant glial tumor with astrocytic differentiation, brisk mitotic activity and the presence of necrosis and/or prominent microvascular proliferation [20 (link)]. Routine immunohistochemical analyses included assessment of IDH1 R132H by the H09 antibody (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany), of BRAF V600E by the VE1 antibody (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), of ATRX (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and of H3 K27 M (Merck Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA) status. Immunohistochemistry was performed on a Ventana BenchMark XT Immunostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona, USA) using established protocols. For dilutions and antibody details, see Additional file 1. Immunostaining with antibodies against BRAF V600E, IDH1 R132H and H3 K27 M was scored as either positive or negative. Care was taken to exclude unspecific binding and binding to non-tumorous cells. Loss of nuclear ATRX expression was scored as specific, if tumor cell nuclei showed loss of expression, while nuclei of non-neoplastic cells, such as endothelia, microglia, lymphocytes and reactive astrocytes, were positive. Of note, weak to moderate staining of tumor cell cytoplasm was occasionally seen and was considered as non-specific [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!