The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Clindamycin

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany

Clindamycin is a laboratory product used for research purposes. It is an antibiotic that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis. Clindamycin is commonly used in microbiology and molecular biology experiments to selectively culture or manipulate bacterial strains.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

106 protocols using clindamycin

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BD Phoenix M50 was used to test the susceptibility profile against 11 antibiotics, including penicillin, ampicillin, linezolid, vancomycin, tigecycline, quinupristin/dalfopristin, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol. Streptococcus pneumoniae (ATCC 49619) was used as a quality control strain. According to the recommendations and interpretation of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), strains resistant to erythromycin but sensitive to clindamycin were determined as MLSb resistance phenotype using the D-test with erythromycin (15 μg) and clindamycin (2 μg) from Oxoid Limited. If the inhibition zone surrounding the clindamycin disk adjacent to the erythromycin disk appeared truncated (in the shape of a “D”), the D test is positive, and the iMLSb phenotype is determined. Antibiotic sensitivity interpretation was performed based on the CLSI-M100-S23 from CLSI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic and Chemotherapy Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three different antibiotic treatments were used over the course of this study: (1) a single i.p. injection of clindamycin (200 µg/mouse in PBS); (2) a single dose of streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 20 mg/mouse in PBS) administered by oral gavage; (3) a single dose of metronidazole (Sigma-Aldrich), neomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and vancomycin (NOVAPLUS; 3.5 mg each/mouse in PBS) administered by oral gavage, followed by a single injection of clindamycin 3 d later. For the experiment shown in Fig. 6, 2 mg streptomycin/mouse was administered to facilitate microbiota recovery.
Chemotherapy was composed of cyclophosphamide (Sigma-Aldrich; 1.8 mg/mouse; ∼100 mg/kg) and doxorubicin (Pfizer; 0.27 mg/mouse; ∼15 mg/kg) and administered together via i.p injection in 200 µl total volume. Chemotherapy was administered twice, 1 wk apart; bleeding or infections were performed 1 d after the second administration. For the experiments shown in Fig. 4 F, mice were administered streptomycin via oral gavage on the same day of second chemotherapy treatment, and infected 24 h later.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibiotics (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Washington, USA) were used for antibiotic susceptibility testing of S. aureus:
Amikacin (AK), cefoxitin (FOX), chloramphenicol (C), co-trimoxazole (SXT), ciprofloxacin (CIP), gentamicin (CN), linezolid (LZD), fusidic acid (FD), neomycin, norfloxacin (NOR), tetracycline (TE), penicillin (P), clindamycin (DA), erythromycin (E), tigecycline (TGC), teicoplanin (TEC), tobramycin (TOB), and vancomycin (VA).
All of the coagulase test positive staphylococci isolates were tested for resistance to FOX on MH Agar using 30 ug/mL FOX according to the standard guidelines of CLSI. As per CLSI guidelines, the resistant strains showed a zone diameter of <24 mm, while a diameter of >25 mm showed the susceptible (S) strains. Strains that were resistant to FOX were noted as MRSA [24 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Group B Streptococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial resistance of GBS was determined through the disk diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer), according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [40 ]. The clinical isolates were tested for susceptibility to seven different antibiotics, including penicillin (10 units), ampicillin (10 μg), cefditoren (5 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), and erythromycin (15 μg) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, UK). Briefly, GBS colonies were suspended in 5 ml of sterile physiological saline, and the turbidity adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard, corresponding to a concentration of approximately 1.5 × 108 CFU/ml. A sterile cotton swab was dipped in the bacterial suspension and swabbed over the surface of the Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (MHAB) (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). The antibiotic disks were placed on the plates and incubated for 20–24 h at 35 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. After incubation, the zone of inhibition around the disks was measured by a calibrated ruler and interpreted using a standard chart (Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of S. aureus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus strains (NCCP 16830, NCCP 14567, NCCP 14754, and KVCC-BA0500624) were investigated using disc diffusion assay according to the guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [53 ]. Briefly, each of the S. aureus strains was aerobically grown at 37 °C on the BHI agar plate for 18 h, and colonies were picked and suspended in sterilized saline to meet turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standard. Each bacterial suspension was spread on the Mueller–Hinton agar plate and incubated in the presence of antibiotic discs at 35 °C for 18 h. The antibiotic discs used were cefoxitin (30 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), penicillin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), and chloramphenicol (30 μg) purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). After incubation, the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured to evaluate antibiotic resistance or susceptibility of S. aureus strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Lactobacillus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Double-layer disc diffusion was used to determine the susceptibility to metronidazole (5μg), clindamycin (2μg), penicillin (2μg) and amoxicillin (10μg; Davies Diagnostics, South Africa), as described previously [58 (link)]. These experiments were performed in duplicate. For rifampicin and rifabutin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using two-fold serial dilutions according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) 2019 guidelines, with concentrations ranging from 5–0.00488μg/mL for rifabutin and 25–0.024μg/mL for rifampicin. MICs below the lowest or above the highest concentration tested were assigned a MIC half of the lowest or twice the highest concentration tested, respectively. Experiments were performed in duplicate. For a subset of Lactobacillus strains (n = 20), broader antibiotic susceptibility profiles were determined using Sensititre GPALL1F plates (including ampicillin, cefoxitin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, daptomycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, nitrofurantoin, oxacillin, penicillin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, rifampin, streptomycin, tetracycline, tigecycline, trimethoprim/sulamethoxazole and vancomycin; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic drug susceptibility testing was performed on Mueller–Hinton agar supplemented with 5 % sheep blood (bioMérieux, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). The disc diffusion test was performed with clindamycin (2 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), penicillin (10U), vancomycin (30 µg) and tetracycline (30 µg) discs (Oxoid, Altrincham, UK). Isolates were investigated for inducible clindamycin resistance by double disc diffusion test to identify the cMLS (constitutive methylation), iMLS (inducible methylation) and M (efflux mechanism) resistance phenotypes. Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used as a control. Tests were performed and interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standards (M100 S26) [15 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patterns of antibiotic resistance of the E. coli isolates were assessed using the simple disc diffusion method. The isolates were cultured onto the Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Mumbai, India; MV1084). Antibiotic discs including kanamycin (1000 μg/disc), tetracycline (30 μg/disc), ampicillin (10 μg/disc), gentamycin (10 μg/disc), imipenem (30 μg/disc), amikacin (30 μg/disc), mezlocillin (30 μg/disc), cefotaxime (30 μg/disc), piperacillin (30 μg/disc), ciprofloxacin (5 μg/disc), cotrimoxazole (30 μg/disc), norfloxacin (30 μg/disc), ceftazidime (30 μg/disc), nitrofurantoin (300 μg/disc), ofloxacin (5 μg/disc), ceftriaxone (30 μg/disc), nalidixic acid (30 μg/disc), tobramycin (30 μg/disc), clindamycin (2 μg/disc) and cephalothin (30 μg/disc) (Oxoid) were placed on the cultured Mueller–Hinton agar and all media were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 hours. All examinations and also interpretation of the findings were performed according to the instructions and guidelines of the CLSI [37 ]. Escherichia coli ATCC 8739 was used as a control organism.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility of P. konkukensis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility of P. konkukensis was determined according to the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method. The antibiotics used in this study were gentamycin (2 µg), vancomycin (30 µg), ampicillin (2 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), kanamycin (64 µg), erythromycin (1 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), and clindamycin (2 µg) (Oxoid Ltd., Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK). The freshly prepared P. konkukensis bacterial culture incubated at 37 °C for 24 h was swabbed onto R2A agar plate using sterilized cotton swabs. Each disc of antibiotics was placed on the agar plate. After incubation at 37 °C for 48 h, a clear zone around the disc was observed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacteroides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of antibiotic susceptibility was achieved as previously described [31 (link),32 (link)]. Briefly, Bacteroides strains were grown on BHI + H and incubated in an Anaerobic jar (AnaeroGen, Oxoid) at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in 0.9% saline to a density of McFarland 1. The disc diffusion assays were performed using Brucella blood agar plates supplemented with hemin (0.1%) and vitamin K1 (1%). The antibiotic discs (Oxoid) were amoxycillin–clavulanate (20/10 μg) (AMC), clindamycin (10 μg) (DA), imipinem (10 μg) (IMP), moxifloxacin (5 μg) (MXF), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 μg) (TZP) and metronidazole (5 μg) (MTZ). The plates were incubated in anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24 h. Six discs (three per plate) were used. The susceptibility zone diameter provisional breakpoints previously suggested [31 (link),32 (link)] were followed: amoxycillin–clavulanate (≥15 mm), clindamycin (≥25 mm), imipenem (≥29 mm), moxifloxacin (≥19 mm), piperacillin-tazobactam (≥25 mm) and metronidazole (≥24 mm). Next, the results for imipinem and Metronidazole were confirmed by Epsilon test according to manufacturer’s procedure (Biomérieux, Portugal). The breakpoints were established according to EUCAST [33 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!