The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Cyan flow cytometer

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

The BD Cyan flow cytometer is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis and sorting of cells and particles. It utilizes the principles of flow cytometry to rapidly measure and analyze the physical and chemical characteristics of cells or other particles as they flow in a stream through a beam of light. The core function of the BD Cyan flow cytometer is to provide researchers and scientists with a tool for quantitative and qualitative analysis of cellular properties and populations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using cyan flow cytometer

1

Flow Cytometry for Monocyte Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested and washed in ice-cold PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.08% sodium azide. Cellular debris were excluded based on size (forward scatter [FSC]) and granularity (side scatter [SSC]). The FSC/SSC gate for Monocyte comprised ∼60%, total events. Couplets were excluded based on SSC versus FSC and SSC versus pulse width measurements. Samples were stained for cell surface markers with FITC, PE, and APC conjugated antibodies. For polarization analysis, human antibodies for CD23, MHCII (both M1 marker), CD163, CD206, and dectin (M2 marker) were purchased from BD Pharmingen or BioLegend. Unstained and isotype control treated cells were used as controls. Samples were analyzed using a FACScan or BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA. Further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Cells were gated according to their forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) properties including the larger cells with high granularity and excluding the small-sized debris with a low SSC and FSC shown at the bottom left corner of the dot plot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cell Cycle Analysis via BrdU Incorporation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Calu-3 cells were incubated in 10 μM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (Sigma) for 60 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed, and trypsinised before fixation in ice-cold ethanol. Cells underwent 30 min digestion in warmed pepsin solution (Sigma), before treating with 2M HCl for 15 min. Samples were washed, then blocked (0.5% BSA/0.5% Tween 20) for 30 min before staining with a-BrdU-488 (Biolegend) directly conjugated antibody and Propidium Iodide (Invitrogen). Samples were acquired on BD Cyan Flow Cytometer and analyzed via Flow-Jo.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lentiviral Titer Determination Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vector titration by flow cytometry: 1 × 105 HEK293T cells were plated into each well of a 6-well plate and transduced with a range of volumes of concentrated lentivirus. At 72 hr after transduction, cells were trypsinized and EGFP-positive cells were quantified using a BD Cyan flow cytometer or BD FACSArray Bioanalyzer 3 days after transduction.
HEK293T cells were not used for qPCR titration due to their reported abnormal karyotype.56 (link) Briefly, 1 × 105 HT1080 cells were plated into each well of a 6-well plate and transduced with a range of volumes of concentrated lentivirus. At 72 hr after transduction, genomic DNA was extracted and the provirus titer calculated by qPCR, as described previously.57 (link) The viral capsid number was determined using a p24 ELISA kit (Clontech - 632200). The capsid number was determined according to the kit manufacturer’s calculations, where 1 ng p24 is equivalent to 1.25 × 107 lentiviral particles (lp). The vector RNA genome titer was determined using a qRT-PCR RNA titration kit containing pre-designed primers and standards (Clontech - 631235). For all titer comparisons, LTR1 and third generation vectors were produced side-by-side to account for variations between production batches.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Myeloid Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of surface markers was analyzed using Abs specific for human CD206, CD163, and CD45 (all purchased from BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). Corresponding fluorescence label-conjugated isotype controls were utilized in all experiments. In brief, cells were washed once in room temperature flow buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.05% NaN3), once in ice-cold flow buffer and cell staining was performed on ice. Samples were analyzed using a BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested after treatments, washed with ice cold PBS and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 mins. After washing, cells were resuspended in 50–100 μL of FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotech), followed by 15 min incubation at room temperature (RT) to allow blocking of Fc receptors. The cell pellet was washed twice, resuspended in 50 μL 2% BSA/TBS (w/v), and incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (1:50 or 1:100 dilution). The following antibodies were used: Human CD4, CD80, CD86, MHC-I, MHC-II, PD-L1 and PD-L2 (BD Pharmingen), mouse CD4, CD11c, F4/80 (eBiosciences, San Jose, USA). Samples were analyzed using a FACScan or BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested after treatments and washed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.08% sodium azide. Cellular debris and detritus was excluded based on size (forward scatter; FSC) and granularity (side scatter; SSC). The FSC/SSC gate for Mφ, DC and monocytes comprised ~60%, ~80-90%, and ~90% of total events, respectively. Couplets were excluded based on SSC vs FSC and SSC vs Pulse width measurements. Fluorescence minus-one samples constituted controls for cells treated with bioparticles. Samples were analyzed using a FACScan or BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Myeloid Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of surface markers was analyzed using Abs specific for human CD206, CD163, and CD45 (all purchased from BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA). Corresponding fluorescence label-conjugated isotype controls were utilized in all experiments. In brief, cells were washed once in room temperature flow buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FBS and 0.05% NaN3), once in ice-cold flow buffer and cell staining was performed on ice. Samples were analyzed using a BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying EpCAM+ and EpCAM- Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the percentage of EpCAM+ and EpCAM cells, cells were dissociated with TrypLE (Gibco), and 106 cells were added to 100 µL of flow buffer, 1x PBS (Gibco) with 1% BSA. 5 µL of anti-EpCAM-FITC antibody (Stem Cell Technologies) was added and incubated on ice for 1 hour. Cells were washed 3 times with flow buffer, fixed with 10% formalin, passed through a 40 µM filter, and run on a BD Cyan Flow Cytometer. The data were analyzed using FloJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometry Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested after treatments, washed with ice cold PBS, and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 mins. After washing, cells were resuspended in 50–100 µL of FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), followed by 15 min incubation at room temperature (RT) to allow blocking of Fc receptors. The cell pellet was washed twice, resuspended in 50 µL 2% BSA/TBS (w/v), and incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies. Samples were analyzed using a FACScan or BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying M2 Macrophages in IL-4-Stimulated RAW264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To confirm the percentage of M2 macrophages in the IL-4- stimulated RAW264.7 cells, we analyzed the positive rate of CD206, a widely utilized surface marker of M2 macrophages,16 (link) by flow cytometry. Corresponding fluorescence label-conjugated isotype controls were utilized in this experiment. Briefly, all the IL-4-stimulated RAW264.7 cells were harvested 24 h later and washed by flow buffer (PBS supplemented with 1% [v/v] FBS and 0.05% NaN3) once in room temperature and once sequentially in ice-cold flow buffer. Then, CD206-specific antibody (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA; diluted 1:40) was used to analyze the expression of CD206 via a BD Cyan flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Further analysis was performed using FloJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!