The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using lightcyclerr 480 real time pcr system

1

Quantitative RT-PCR of L. japonica

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves and flowers at different developmental stages were collected, and total RNA was isolated as described above. First-strand cDNA was reverse transcribed using a FastQuant RT Kit With gDNase (Tiangen, China) and qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR-Green using a Light Cycler R480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Switzerland). The relative quantification of each transcript was performed in triplicate as described previously54 (link), and the actin gene from L. japonica (KU127582) was chosen as a reference gene.
All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Profiling of Tight Junction and Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues and cells were obtained and lysed in TRIzol. Markers for RT-qPCR were selected: Claudin-1, Occludin-1, Jam-1, ZO-1, MCT-1, SMCT-1, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, LFA-1, MCP-1, MKP-1, PP1, PP2, PP2A, PTP1B and SHP2. All mRNA samples were extracted and transcribed into cDNA according to standard protocols (TAKARA, PrimeScript RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time), RR036A). 5 ng/µL cDNA was prepared with 1.6 µL each of forward and reverse primers (5µM) and 10 µL SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (TAKARA, TB GreenTM Premix Ex TaqTM II (Tli RNaseH Plus, RR820A)) before performing on the LightCycler R 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Indiana, USA). The expression of all the target genes was normalized to GAPDH. The relative changes in gene expressions were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The primers used in the study were shown in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative miRNA Analysis in Plasma and Colonies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
miRCURY LNA RT Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used to assay miRNA quantitative real–time polymerase chain reaction (qRT–PCR) in plasma and Hill colonies as described previously in detail [31 (link)]. Briefly, cDNA was diluted 100× and assayed in 10 μL PCR reactions according to the protocol for miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR; miRNA was assayed once by qPCR on the miRNA Ready-to-Use PCR, Human panel I + II (Catalog number: 339322, QIAGEN) using miRCURY LNA SYBR Green master mix. The amplification was performed in a LightCyclerR 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in 384 well plates and analyzed using the Roche LC software 4 (Basel, Switzerland) both for the determination of Cq. All Cq data were normalized using the global mean method based on the average of the assays detected in all samples, yielding ΔCq values. Fold-change analysis was performed using 2 × |ΔΔCq| calculation, with ΔΔCq obtained from (∆Cq × T1DM) − (∆Cq × HCs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rice Total RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from different tissues of rice plants using a RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen, Seoul, Korea, www.qiagen.com) respectively, and single-strand cDNA was synthesized with random oligonucleotides using a reverse transcription system (Bioneer, www.bioneer.co.kr, E-3122 (M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase) based on a previously reported method [18 (link)]. Primers used in the experiment are listed in Supplementary Table S1. qRT-PCR analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using LightCyclerR 480 Real Time PCR system (Roche, CA, United States). “Relative expression” levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method, and OsActin (Q10DV7) was used as a reference gene in rice. All experiments included three biological replicates, each with two technical replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Extraction and qPCR Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA extractions from 5 × 105-2 × 106 cells were performed with Quick RNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research). DNAse treatment was performed on-column as indicated. 150 ng-1ug RNA were retrotranscribed with Reverse Aid reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). In all cases, a control reaction was prepared without RTase (“no RT”) in order to detect genomic DNA contamination. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed with SYBR Green master mix (Roche) and in LightCyclerR480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche). Primer sequences can be found in Additional file 6: Table S7 and S8. All quantifications were normalized to an endogenous control (Hipoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase, HPRT; or Glyderaldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, GAPDH). The relative quantification value for each target gene compared with the calibrator is expressed as 2^(Ct-Cc). Products from the qPCRs were loaded in 2 % agarose gels to check for correct size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RT-PCR Analysis of Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We then selected the following markers for RT-PCR confirmation of mRNA expression levels: IL1R1, TLR2, TLR4, IL1T2, ARG1, and TLR5. All mRNA samples were first transformed into cDNA according to manufacturer instructions (cDNA-High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit, Applied Biosystems, Cat. 4368813). Samples were then prepared by adding 2.5 ng/μL of cDNA with 0.2 μL each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM) and 5 μL of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (ABI, Cat. 4367659) before performing quantitative RT-PCR on the LightCycler R 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Indiana, USA). 18S was used as an internal control. IL1R1—Forward (F) AAAGATGACAGCAAGACACCTG, Reverse (R):GTTTGCAATCCTTACCACGCAA; TLR2—(F): GAGTTCTCCCAGTGTTTGGTGT (R):CACACCATCAGAACCCTGTC; IL1R2—(F):ATGACACCCACATAGAGAGCG (R):GAAGAGCGAAACCCACAGAGT; ARG1—(F):ACTTAAAGAACAAGAGTGTGATGTG (R) CGCTTGCTTTTCCCACAGAC; TLR5—(F):TGCTACTGACAACGTGGCTT (R):CCAGGAAAGCTGGGCAACTA; TLR4—(F):ATGCCAGGATGATGTCTGCC (R):TGGATTTCACACCTCCACGC; 18S—(F):GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT (R):CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG. We then calculated the relative quantification of mRNA expression levels by using the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method (i.e., by comparing the RT-PCR cycle number required to reach target fluorescence) by using the following equation: 2−(ΔCTtarget−ΔCTcalibrator), also known as 2−ΔΔCT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Determination of CYP2C19 Genotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples for the determination of CYP2C19 genotype were collected. DNA was isolated from whole blood using a WIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used for the detection of the wild-type CYP2C19*1 gene and the two mutated genes, CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3, using a specific TaqMan SNP Genotyping assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA) and a LightCyclerR 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).(13 (link),14 (link)) Homozygous EM was defined as wt/wt, heterozygous EM was defined as wt/m1 and wt/m2, and PM was defined as m1/m1, m2/m2 and m1/m2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying miRNA Differential Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the miRNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), as explained in Phowira et al., 2022 [8 (link)].
Reverse transcription was performed using the miRCURY LNA RT Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) on about 10 μL of RNA. Following the methodology for miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR, cDNA was diluted 100× and assessed in 10 μL PCR reactions. The miRNA was assayed once by qPCR using the miRCURY LNA SYBR Green master mix on the miRNA Ready-to-Use PCR, Human panel I + II (Catalog number: 339322, QIAGEN). The amplification was carried out using a LightCyclerR 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and data were analyzed using Roche LC software 4 (Basel, Switzerland). The ΔCq values were obtained by using the global mean normalization approach to correct all Cq data. Fold-change analysis was performed using 2 × |ΔΔCq| calculation, with ΔΔCq obtained from (∆Cq × T1DM) − (∆Cq × HCs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RT-qPCR Validation of ceRNA Network

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the expression of the ceRNA regulatory network, the DE-lncRNAs, and their target mRNAs, RT–qPCR validation was performed using SYBR Green assay reagents and a LightCyclerR 480 RealTime PCR System (Roche, USA) as described by Zhou et al. (2012) (link). Total and small RNAs were extracted using the same samples used for RNA-sequencing. For small RNA reverse transcription, universal primers (Supplementary Table S1) in the Mir-X miRNA First-Strand Synthesis (Clontech Laboratories, CA, USA) were used for reverse transcription. Mature miRNA sequences and universal primers (Supplementary Table S1) were used for RT–qPCR according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the SYBR qRT-PCR kit (Clontech Laboratories, CA, USA). For RNA reverse transcription, 2 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa BIO, Japan). The specific primers of the tested genes are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Each DE-lncRNA, DE-miRNA, and DE-mRNA was analyzed in three replicates. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method. Actin was used as the endogenous reference genes for DE-lncRNAs and DE-mRNAs, and 5.8S rRNA was used as the endogenous reference gene for DE-miRNAs (Supplementary Table S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptomic Analysis of Poplar Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA of poplar roots was extracted using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Total RNA was isolated and extracted using a total RNA extraction kit [TRK1001, Lianchuan (LC) Science, Hangzhou, China]. Simultaneously, DNA and ribosomal RNA were removed from total RNA using RNase-free DNase I (E1091, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, United States) and ribosomal RNA removal kits (MRZPL116, Illumina, CA, United States), respectively. The RNA was then reverse transcribed using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To confirm that the circRNAs sequenced in poplar roots were actual circRNAs, we used convergent primers (positive control) and divergent primers for PCR (Supplementary Table 1). The PCR products were verified by electrophoresis and sequenced.
To verify the expression of DECs and DE-mRNAs in poplar roots treated with three N forms, RTqPCR was performed on a Light CyclerR 480 Real Time PCR System (Roche, United States) using the SYBR Green PCR kit (TaKaRa) as described by Zhou et al. (2020) (link). The relative expression levels were determined by the 2–ΔΔCt method. The Actin gene was used as an endogenous reference gene for circRNAs and targets. All experiments were repeated three times. Specific primer sequences for the amplification of circRNAs and mRNAs are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!