The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using nis elements c

1

Quantifying DCX and OxA in Hippocampus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
20-µm coronal DCX-ir sections DAPI labeled were scanned on a confocal microscope Nikon Eclipse Ti2 (Nikon, Florence, Italy) equipped with an x-y-z motorized stage, a digital camera DS-Qi2 (Nikon, Florence, Italy), and the acquisition and image analysis software NIS-Elements C (Nikon, Florence, Italy). Each section was used to identify (1) the inner molecular layer (IML), which was defined as the first 50 µm from and parallel to the outer border of DAPI-positive cells, and (2) the medial molecular layer (MML), which was defined as the last 100 µm from, and parallel to, the outer border of the IML. DCX-positive dendrites within the IML and MML were imaged and level of branching was evaluated from a maximum-intensity projection of the z-series stack as described by Rosenzweig and Wojtowicz89 (link) and expressed as a percentage of DCX-ir area/µm2 of GCL, IML, or MML including also “orphan” dendrites otherwise excluded by conventional single tracing method of dendrites. The same procedure was adopted for the quantification OxA immunoreactivity in the molecular layers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Confocal Imaging of Retinal Flat Mounts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal images spanning entire retinal flat mounts were generated as previously described (Bosco et al., 2012 (link), 2011 (link)) using a confocal imaging system equipped with a 20× lens and a resonant scanner (A1R confocal, Eclipse Ti inverted microscope and NIS-Elements C, Nikon). Multipoint images (625 xy positions) were acquired at high resolution (0.41 µm/px), then stitched and projected as maximal intensity of the inner 30-40 µm of retina (0.8-µm step). To allow image analysis and quantification, the parameters of image acquisition were maintained constant between retinal samples, and, for illustration, images had their brightness and contrast minimally edited. Counts of ONH cells expressing GFP and/or sialoadhesin where manually performed in the central 200×200 µm around the optic disc, visualizing each channel independently in maximum-intensity projections, and verifying colocalization in slice view, through the z plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Presynaptic Protein Colocalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
L4 larvae were mounted on a 1.5% agarose pad with 20 mM sodium azide in M9 solution for anesthesia. Images were acquired on an inverted confocal microscope (Nikon A1, Nikon) with a 60× objective lens, and were analyzed by NIS-Elements C/NIS-Elements C-ER and ImageJ software, respectively. The Z-stack image was acquired from the whole animals expressing each fluorescent fusion proteins. Co-localization between GLR-1 or GLC-3 GFP fusion proteins and a presynaptic mCherry::RAB-3 fusion protein was quantified by counting the number of GFP pixels overlapping with mCherry signal in a single z-axis flame. The number of pixels in each frame of Z-scan was averaged in each animal and used for quantitative analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Biofilm Visualization via CLSM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For visualisation of static biofilms with confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), stained coverslips were rinsed with PBS and inverted onto a PBS-filled rubber frame secured on a microscope slide. Imaging was performed using a Nikon A1R confocal laser scanning microscope fitted with CFI PLAN APO VC objective (Nikon 60x/1.40 Oil). Images were captured with NIS-Elements C (v4.4, Nikon) software and processed using Imaris (v8.2, Bitplane) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chitin Characterization by UV-Vis and Confocal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UV-Vis spectra of chitin samples were collected between 250 and 650 nm with a 1 nm resolution, and an average time of 0.1 s.
Confocal microscopy imaging was performed using an NIS-Elements C, Nikon, and exciting the sample using a 489.3 nm laser. The 512 × 512 images were acquired at a pixel size of 0.62 μm (optical resolution of 0.25 μm) and a Z step of 0.35 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Biofilm Biovolume by Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biofilms for visualization experiments were cultured on sterile glass coverslips incubated in wells of six-well tissue culture dishes. Following growth, biofilms were rinsed with PBS and incubated with Live/Dead BacLight stain (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 15 min at 20°C. For confocal laser scanning microscopy, each stained coverslip was rinsed with PBS and inverted onto a PBS-filled Gene frame (25 μL, 1.0 × 1.0 cm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) secured on a microscope slide.
Imaging was performed using a Nikon A1R confocal laser scanning microscope fitted with CFI PLAN APO VC objective (Nikon 60×/1.40 Oil).
Images were captured with NIS-ElEmEnts C (v4.4, Nikon, Kingston upon Thames, UK) software and processed using ImarIs (v8.2, Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland) software. Biovolume quantification of Z-stacks was conducted using VolocIty software (v6.3, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA), set to identify objects ≥1 μm 2 as S. gordonii cells. At least three Z-stacks (image size 1024 × 1024) from three different fields of view were analyzed for each strain. The data were analyzed from three independent experiments. Statistical significance of differences between biofilm biovolume was assessed using analysis of variance with Tukey's post-hoc test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing RNA-DNA Hybrids in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Day 8 FLDCs from C57BL/6 mice were transfected with 1 μg/ml fluorescently labelled R:D45 or the fluorescently labelled non-complementary oligonucleotides ssRNA45 and ssDNA60 using Lipofectamine LTX. After 1 h, cells were adhered to polysine slides (Thermo Scientific), fixed with 4% PFA and nuclei stained with DAPI. To stain endolysosomal compartments, 2 μM LysoTracker Green DND-26 (Life Technologies) was added to the cells for 1 h before fixation. To visualise RNA:DNA hybrids using the S9.6 antibody, fixed cells were permeabilised using 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100/PBS for 2 min, blocked for 1 h with 2% (w/v) BSA/PBS and incubated with 1 μg/ml S9.6 antibody, which was detected using 1:500 dilution FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes). Images were taken on a Nikon A1R confocal microscope comprising of a Nikon Eclipse TiE inverted microscope with Perfect Focus System. Image capture was performed using Nikon Nis-Elements C (Nikon Instruments Europe). 3 channel images were acquired by consecutive scanning with only one laser line active per scan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of GITRL and GITR Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRL5946 cells were seeded on eight-well culture slides (Corning Life Sciences) with each well 104 cells and treated with cisplatin 2 ug/ml or γ-ray radiation 7.5 Gy. After incubating for 96 h, the medium was removed and the slide was washed twice with cold PBS. The viable cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The slides were stained with anti-human GITRL antibody (Clone:109101, R&D SYSTEMS), anti-mouse IgG Antibody-AF488 conjugated (Invitrogen), anti-human GITR antibody-PE conjugated (Clone#621, Biolegend Inc.), and DAPI (Cell Signaling) following the commercial instructions. The fluorescence images of whole sides were captured by Nikon A1R+ system, which is built onto a Nikon Eclipse TI-E inverted microscope with Nikon NIS Elements C for acquisition and analysis of images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!